05.11.2014 Views

Vol 21 No. 1

Vol 21 No. 1

Vol 21 No. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J Bagh College Dentistry <strong>Vol</strong>.<strong>21</strong>(1), 2009 The effect of dowel …<br />

RESULTS<br />

Retentive failure was recorded as point of<br />

deflection on Instron recording sheet. Mean<br />

failure loads (in Newton) and standard deviation<br />

(±SD) were calculated for all tested groups (Table<br />

1), and illustrated graphically in Figure 1.<br />

Table 1: The data of tensile forces (in Newton)<br />

for all test specimens with Mean and Standard<br />

deviation of each group.<br />

Mean<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Mean ± SD<br />

Group1 65.75 23.6<br />

Group II 64.25 22.2<br />

Group III 189.5 25.9<br />

Group IIII 2<strong>21</strong>.1 27.0<br />

65.75 64.25<br />

189.5<br />

Group1 Group II Group III Group IIII<br />

2<strong>21</strong>.1<br />

Figure 1: Bar chart graph to compare the<br />

mean retentive values for the experimental<br />

groups.<br />

At an embedment depth of 5mm Euro post<br />

(stainless steel, parallel sided, serrated posts)<br />

(group ΙV) tended to be the most retentive post<br />

among tested groups with mean retentive force of<br />

2<strong>21</strong>.1±27N.The next more retentive configuration<br />

was Euro post (group ΙΙΙ) at embedment depth of<br />

10mm,which was retained at 189.5 ±25.9N. Easy<br />

post (fiber reinforced, tapered, smooth posts) at<br />

embedment depth 10mm (group Ι) exhibited mean<br />

retentive ability of 65.75±23.6 N while Easy post<br />

at embedment depth of 5mm( group ΙΙ) was the<br />

least retentive posts at 64.25 ±22.2 N.<br />

Statistical analysis of data using analysis of<br />

variance "ANOVA" revealed that there was a<br />

statistically highly significant difference (p<<br />

0.001) between the mean retentive values among<br />

the four groups tested as shown in Table 2.<br />

Further investigation using LSD (Least<br />

Significant differences) test showed that there was<br />

a statistically highly significant difference (P<<br />

0.001) between group Ι and group ΙV, also<br />

between group ΙI and group ΙV. There was<br />

statistically significant difference (P< 0.05)<br />

between group Ι and group ΙΙΙ, also between<br />

group ΙΙ and group III, while there was no<br />

significant difference (P>0.05) between group Ι<br />

and group ΙΙ, also between group ΙΙΙ and group ΙV<br />

(Table 3).<br />

Table 2: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test<br />

for the four groups.<br />

F-value P-value<br />

Between<br />

groups<br />

29.40<br />

0.000<br />

HS<br />

Table 3: Least significant difference LSD test<br />

to compare the mean retentive values for the<br />

experimental groups.<br />

P-value Sig<br />

Group I & Group II 0.90 NS<br />

Group I & Group III 0.0014 S<br />

Group I & group IV 0.000 HS<br />

Group II & Group III 0.0012 S<br />

Group II & Group IV 0.000 HS<br />

Group III & Group IV 0.28 NS<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The retention of a post in the root canal is<br />

critical for the successful restoration of<br />

endodontically treated teeth. The retention of<br />

various types of posts has been the subject of<br />

much experimentation; numerous studies of<br />

retentive properties have been conducted relative<br />

to the form, shape, diameter, length and surface<br />

configuration of the posts. Although every effort<br />

has been made to select specimens of comparable<br />

characteristics and to standardize the experimental<br />

procedure accurately, a range of retention values<br />

with in each group couldn't be avoided. The<br />

variability of the physical properties of human<br />

teeth may be a reason for such data range, dentin<br />

is a heterogeneous tissue, its structure, and degree<br />

of calcification can vary from tooth to another.<br />

Under the condition of the present study the<br />

results showed that endodontically treated teeth<br />

restored with Euro post (Stainless steel /parallel<br />

sided /serrated posts) recorded significantly<br />

higher retentive values than those restored with<br />

Easy post (fiber reinforced /tapered /smooth<br />

posts). Dowel design is very important variable<br />

affecting both retention and protection potential<br />

for the dowel. Dowels that are tapered and<br />

cemented in their channels are least retentive and<br />

act as wedges causing coronal stress<br />

concentrations. Parallel sided, serrated dowels act<br />

as intermediate retainers and distribute stress<br />

evenly through remaining root structure. Surface<br />

configuration of the dowel is another important<br />

variable in retention; the marked increase of<br />

Restorative Dentistry<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!