05.11.2014 Views

Vol 21 No. 1

Vol 21 No. 1

Vol 21 No. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J Bagh College Dentistry <strong>Vol</strong>. <strong>21</strong>(1), 2009 Assessment of Magnesium …<br />

immune disturbance could be the cause of these<br />

results may be considered true but further<br />

explorations are needed to confirm this<br />

hypothesis.<br />

Table 1: The histopathological presentation of the patients.<br />

Histopathological diagnosis<br />

Frequency<br />

Male Female Total<br />

Squamous all carcinoma (well, moderately<br />

, poorly differentiated, invasive and verrucous)<br />

11 13 24<br />

Rhabdomyosarcoma 01 02 03<br />

Adenocarcinoma 00 02 02<br />

Malignant melanoma 02 00 02<br />

Fibrosarcoma 00 01 01<br />

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma 00 01 01<br />

Total 14 19 33<br />

Table 2: Ca and Mg status in lymphocytes (mg/mm 3 ) of patients<br />

Male <strong>No</strong>. Female <strong>No</strong>. Total <strong>No</strong>. <strong>No</strong>rmal <strong>No</strong>.<br />

Ca 1.755±0.780 7 5.282±3.401 12 3.983±3.<strong>21</strong>4 19 2.6±1.4 18<br />

Mg 2.206±2.975 8 3.035±1.952 12 2.598±2.364 20 2.01±0.<strong>21</strong> 18<br />

The results are expressed in (mg/mm 3 ) as mean – SD of number of cases<br />

Table 3: Ca and Mg status in healthy and diseased tissues of both males and females.<br />

The element Sex Healthy tissue Diseased tissue <strong>No</strong>.<br />

Ca<br />

Male 0.584±0.526 0.369±0.282 11<br />

Female 1.796±2.969 0.628±1.228 15<br />

Mg<br />

Male 0.228±0.283 0.145±0.120 11<br />

Female 0.854±1.577 0.247±0.599 15<br />

The results are expressed in (mg/mg) as (Mean–SD) of number of cases<br />

Table 4. The relationship between lymphocytes (µg/mm 3 ) and tissue (µg/mg) Mg in patients with<br />

oral cancer.<br />

Sex r t p df N<br />

Male 0.1689 0.5141 o.620 9 11<br />

Healthy vs diseased tissue<br />

Female 0.7<strong>21</strong> 3.759 0.002* 13 15<br />

Male 0.806 2.361 0.099 3 5<br />

Lymphocytes vs healthy tissue Female -0.0625 0.165 0.873 7 9<br />

Male -0.601 1.304 0.283 3 5<br />

Lymphocytes vs diseased tissue Female -0.114 0.305 0.769 7 9<br />

Table 5: The relationship between lymphocytes (mg/mm3) and tissue (mg/mg) Ca in patients with<br />

oral cancer<br />

Sex R t p df N<br />

Male 0.2334 0.720 o.490 9 11<br />

Healthy vs diseased tissue<br />

Female 0.749 4.685 0.001* 13 15<br />

Male 0.3534 0.654 0.560 3 5<br />

Lymphocytes vs healthy tissue Female 0.5441 1.715 0.130 7 9<br />

Male -0.422 0.806 0.479 3 5<br />

Lymphocytes vs diseased tissue Female 0.5<strong>21</strong> 1.617 0.150 7 9<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Aikawa JK. Magnesium: Its biologic significance<br />

CRC press, Boca Raton F, FL. 1981.<br />

2. Shils ME. Experimental human magnesium depletion.<br />

Medicine 1969; 48: 61.<br />

3. Gullestad L, Nes M, Ronneberg R. Magnesium status<br />

in healthy free living elderly.<br />

J Am Coll Nutr 1994; 13: 45 -50.<br />

4. Tietz A, Burtis AC, Ashwood ER. Trace elements.<br />

Textbook of clinical chemistry. 4 th addition. A division<br />

of hart court base and Company. Philadelphia London.<br />

1994; 1137–62.<br />

Oral diagnosis<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!