08.11.2014 Views

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P OSTER<br />

A BSTRACTS<br />

Conclusion: In this analysis of palliative care inpatients, we<br />

found that escalating ARS increases the odds of delirium. In an effort<br />

to minimize delirium, anticholinergic medications should be added<br />

with caution in this vulnerable cohort. Further prospective studies are<br />

needed to establish a directly causal relationship.<br />

B84<br />

Screening for osteoporosis in elderly patients admitted to post-acute<br />

rehabilitation.<br />

K. Major, 1 S. Monod, 1 C. Bula, 1 S. Rochat, 1 O. Lamy, 2 D. Hans, 2<br />

A. Laszlo, 3 M. Krieg. 2 1. Service of <strong>Geriatrics</strong> medicine and geriatric<br />

rehabilitation, University of Lausanne Medical center, Lausanne,<br />

Switzerland; 2. Center of Bone Diseases, Lausanne University<br />

Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; 3. Service of Geriatric medicine,<br />

Hospital of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.<br />

Background: Screening for osteoporosis is important in older<br />

patients admitted to post-acute rehabilitation. However, DXA measurement<br />

is sometimes difficult to perform because of difficulties in<br />

positioning the patient and artefacts (osteoarthritis, prosthesis). The<br />

objectives were to determine the prevalence of unknown clinical osteoporosis<br />

in rehab patients and to determine new strategies for identifying<br />

clinical osteoporosis in this population.<br />

Method: Over a 9-months period, patients consecutively admitted<br />

to post-acute rehabilitation were included in th stdy. Patients with<br />

osteoporosis diagnosis, and those with terminal illness or severe physical<br />

limitations were excluded. Patients underwent Bone Mineral<br />

Density (BMD) by DXA and Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA).<br />

Clinical osteoporosis was defined as BMD ≤-2.5 SD at any site (lumbar<br />

spine, femoral neck, total hip or distal radius), ≥1 vertebral fracture,<br />

≥1 hip fracture, or another fragility fracture and BMD ≤-2 SD.<br />

Results: Overall, 102 (17.0%) of the 600 patients admitted to<br />

rehab refused to participate in the study or were unable to consent.<br />

Among the 498 remaining patients, 99 (19.9%) were excluded because<br />

of already known diagnosis of osteoporosis, 101 (20.3%) were<br />

excluded because of terminal illness, severe physical limitations, and<br />

45 (9.0%) because of inability to perform DXA during the stay<br />

(death, hospital transfer). Overall, 253 patients were assessed with<br />

DXA and VFA (166 women, mean age 83±7 years, mean BMI 27±6<br />

kg/m2, and 87 men, mean age 82±6 yrs, mean BMI 27±5 kg/m2). Of<br />

these, 70% had history of fall during the last 6 months and 9.1% had<br />

hip fracture history. Prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fracture was<br />

36% in women and 32% in men. Overall, 152 (60.1%) patients had<br />

clinical osteoporosis (women: 67%; men: 46%) according to above<br />

criteria. Hip fracture history and vertebral fracture assessment identified<br />

correctly 105 (69.1%) of these 152 patients.<br />

Conclusion: A high prevalence of osteoporosis was observed in<br />

this population of rehab patients. Osteoporosis status should be systematically<br />

assessed in these patients at high fall risk, at least with<br />

careful history of hip fracture and an assessment for vertebral fractures<br />

with spine X-ray.<br />

B85<br />

Reasons for not prescribing guideline-recommended medications to<br />

veterans with heart failure.<br />

L. Dimaano, 1 C. Peterson, 2 M.A. Steinman. 2 1. University of California,<br />

San Francisco, CA; 2.VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.<br />

Supported By: MSTAR Program Grant 2 T35 AG026736-06<br />

Department of Veteran Affairs Grant 06-080-02<br />

Background:<br />

ACE inhibitors and beta blockers reduce mortality among patients<br />

with heart failure, yet some patients are not prescribed these<br />

medications. While general barriers to prescribing have been previously<br />

described, little is known about the reasons for foregoing treatment<br />

in individual patients, and whether this represents appropriate<br />

or inappropriate care. In this study, we described the distribution of<br />

reasons for not prescribing guideline-recommended drugs to older<br />

adults with heart failure.<br />

Methods:<br />

We conducted a chart review of patients from 4 VA health care<br />

systems who had systolic heart failure but were not prescribed ACE<br />

inhibitors (or ARBs) or beta blockers. For each patient, we used a<br />

standardized chart abstraction tool to identify the clinician’s reasons<br />

for not prescribing these drugs. Because chart review may not fully<br />

capture reasons for non-prescribing, we interviewed 61 clinicians who<br />

cared for patients in our cohort and compared the reasons they cited<br />

in the interview with reasons found in chart review.<br />

Results:<br />

Among 2846 patients screened, 301 were included in the study.<br />

Mean age of subjects was 75 +/- 10 years and 98% were male. 70%<br />

were not prescribed ACE inhibitors or ARBs, 18% were not prescribed<br />

beta blockers, and 11% were not prescribed both drugs. Using<br />

chart review, we identified reasons for non-prescribing in 65% of patients.<br />

The most common reason was clinical contraindications (58%).<br />

We identified at least one non-biomedical reason in 18% of patients,<br />

including patient attitude, adherence, and misuse of drugs (10%), and<br />

co-management with another clinician (6%). Interviews with clinicians<br />

yielded substantially more reasons than chart review (1.6 vs 0.9<br />

reasons per patient, P < .001). While clinical contraindications remained<br />

the most common reason for non-prescribing (70%), clinicians<br />

described other reasons in 66% of patients. These included patient attitude,<br />

adherence and misuse; co-management with other clinicians;<br />

and believing that the drug was not indicated (21-27% each).<br />

Conclusion:<br />

Clinical contraindications are the most common reason for not<br />

prescribing guideline-recommended drugs to heart failure patients.<br />

While chart review indicates that clinical contraindication eclipses all<br />

other reasons in importance, clinician interviews suggest that nonbiomedical<br />

factors figure equally in the decision not to prescribe<br />

these medicines.<br />

B86<br />

Tai Chi training increases the complexity of standing postural<br />

control in frail older adults.<br />

M. Lough, 1 B. Manor, 2 M. Gagnon, 1 I. Iloputaife, 1 P. Wayne, 3<br />

L. Lipsitz. 1,2 1. Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA; 2. Beth<br />

Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston,<br />

MA; 3. Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Boston, MA.<br />

Background: The development of frailty in old age is accompanied<br />

by a loss in the dynamic “complexity” of standing postural control.<br />

In this case, complexity refers to the multi-scale structure contained<br />

within postural sway fluctuations, which is believed to arise<br />

from the numerous processes that regulate the body’s movements<br />

over time. Tai Chi is a mind-body exercise with goals of targeting multiple<br />

physiological processes and integrating their dynamics. We<br />

therefore hypothesized that Tai Chi training would increase postural<br />

sway complexity in frail older adults.<br />

Methods: Subjects were recruited from supportive housing facilities<br />

and randomized into a Tai Chi group (11 women and 3 men;<br />

age=83±6yrs) or educational control group (12 women and 3 men;<br />

age=84±8yrs). Tai Chi and education interventions consisted of two,<br />

60min instructor-led group sessions per week for 12 weeks. To assess<br />

postural sway, center-of-pressure dynamics were recorded during<br />

standing with eyes-open and eyes-closed. Postural sway complexity<br />

was estimated by multi-scale entropy analysis. Average sway speed<br />

and area were also computed. Cognition (i.e., Trail Making Test,<br />

TMT) and physical function (i.e., gait speed, timed up-and-go, TUG)<br />

were evaluated.<br />

S102<br />

AGS 2012 ANNUAL MEETING

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!