08.11.2014 Views

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P OSTER<br />

A BSTRACTS<br />

older adults are needed to better understand its trajectory, associated<br />

factors, and outcomes.<br />

B150<br />

Factors associated with enrollment in a randomized controlled trial<br />

of oxycodone vs acetaminophen for moderate or greater noncancer<br />

pain.<br />

J. Shega, C. Ogbevire, W. Dale. Medicine, University of Chicago,<br />

Chicago, IL.<br />

Supported By: NIA<br />

Background: Studies document the under-identification and<br />

treatment of non-cancer pain among older persons. In addition optimal<br />

pharmacologic management remains unclear.<br />

An obstacle of analgesic use in this setting is lack of high-quality<br />

comparative effectiveness data comparing acetaminophen to opioids<br />

in community-based populations, particularly African <strong>American</strong>s<br />

(AA). We sought to identify factors associated with the likelihood of<br />

older adults enrolling in a randomized control trial (RCT) of these<br />

therapies.<br />

Methods: A face-to-face screening questionnaire was completed<br />

for all referred older adults who were eligible for an analgesic intervention<br />

conducted in a predominantly AA, community-based geriatrics<br />

clinic. Information elicited from the screening questionnaire included<br />

basic demographics, pain intensity (verbal descriptor scale: 0<br />

[no pain] to 5 [excruciating pain], frequency of pain in the past week,<br />

number of painful sites, mobility difficulty, and presence of adequate<br />

social support.<br />

Results: Among the first 50 participants (46/50, 96%, AA) referred,<br />

15 (30%) elected to enroll in the RCT. The most commonly<br />

cited reasons for not enrolling were: 1) infrequency of pain (6%) and<br />

2) fear of opioid-related side effects (8%). Age was not associated<br />

with likelihood of enrollment, 82.2 ( SD=6.78) years versus 82.0<br />

(SD=6.72) years, p=0.94. Gender (female) 31% vs 69%, p=0.55, pain<br />

severity 2.87 ( SD=1.1) versus 3.18 ( SD=1.2), p=0.40, number of<br />

painful sites 2.6 (SD=1.6) versus 2.1 (SD=1.4), p=.53, mobility difficulty<br />

60% versus 40%, p=0.31, and availability of social support 93%<br />

versus 97%, p=1.00 were also not associated with study enrollment.<br />

Those who reported pain everyday, compared with those reporting<br />

pain 1-3 times per week were more likely to enroll, 100% versus<br />

31%., p=0.065.<br />

Conclusion: In this preliminary analysis, the number of older,<br />

primarily AA adults in a community setting enrolled in a RCT that<br />

included an opioid mirrored the rates from cancer clinical trials.<br />

Common stated reasons for not enrolling were concern for side effects<br />

and pain considered insufficient for treatment. The experience<br />

of pain everyday was positively associated with enrollment, while age,<br />

gender, pain intensity, number of pain sites, mobility difficulty, and social<br />

support were not associated with study enrollment. This is unique<br />

information on AA enrollment in RCT for pain management.<br />

B151<br />

Experiences of informal caregivers of older adults discharged from<br />

nursing homes to the community through the Money Follows the<br />

Person Demonstration Program.<br />

L. Kristof, C. Butler, J. Robison, R. Fortinsky. Center on Aging,<br />

University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT.<br />

Background: The multi-state Money Follows the Person (MFP)<br />

Demonstration Program enables Medicaid recipients residing in<br />

nursing homes to move back to their communities. Little is known<br />

about how family and other informal caregivers are affected by older<br />

adults returning to the community after what was considered longterm<br />

nursing home residence. We examined caregiver burden and the<br />

positive aspects of caregiving in caregivers of older adults (age >65)<br />

enrolled in Connecticut’s MFP who were discharged to the community<br />

after a nursing home stay of more than 3 months. Secondary outcomes<br />

evaluated were depressive symptoms and anxiety in caregivers.<br />

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, caregivers completed a<br />

self-administered questionnaire 6 months after their family members<br />

returned to the community. We asked caregivers about stress levels<br />

compared to previous time points. Caregiver burden was measured<br />

using the Modified Zarit Burden Interview. Positive aspects of caregiving<br />

were evaluated using the COPE index. We evaluated for symptoms<br />

of depression using the 2 question PRIME-MD screen. Statistical<br />

analysis was done using SPSS.<br />

Results: Preliminary results from 21 caregivers were analyzed<br />

(M age = 57, range 30-77; 81% female; 48% live with the MFP participant;<br />

32% work full time, 53% do not work). The mean Burden<br />

Index score was 5.38 (M=5.38, Range 0-12); mean score for the<br />

COPE index was 8.85 (M=8.85, Range 0-10). Compared to the time<br />

when the older adults resided in nursing homes, 75% of caregivers<br />

felt less stressed, 10% felt the same stress, and 15 % felt more<br />

stressed. Compared to the period before nursing home admission,<br />

61.1% of the caregivers felt less stress, 27.8% felt the same stress, 11.1<br />

% felt more stressed. Burden scores and COPE index scores were not<br />

significantly different whether caregiver lived with the MPF participant<br />

or not (Burden M=4.2 vs. M=6.45, p=0.081; COPE M=9.6 vs. M=<br />

8.18, p=0.234).<br />

Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest a decrease in caregiver<br />

stress and, compared to other studies of community-based caregivers,<br />

lower levels of caregiver burden and higher levels of positive aspects<br />

of caregiving for caregivers of older MFP participants in CT.<br />

B152<br />

FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AND HEALTH RELATED<br />

QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER TRANSCATHETER AORTIC<br />

VALVE IMPLANTATION IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH<br />

SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS.<br />

M. G. Mendieta F., 1 N. F. Pereyra, 1 E. Sánchez G., 1 E. Gutierrez, 2<br />

F. Fernández Aviles, 2 H. Bueno, 2 M. Vidán A.. 1 1. Geriatry, Gregorio<br />

Marañón Hospital, Madrid, Madrid, Spain; 2. Cardiology Service,<br />

Gregorio Marañon Hospital, Madrid, Madrid, Spain.<br />

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)<br />

improves survival in patients with aortic stenosis unelegible for surgery.<br />

The changes in patients functional performance and quality of<br />

life (QoL) after TAVI are not well known.<br />

Methods: The change in health related quality of life (SF-12<br />

questionnaire), autonomy for activities of daily living (ADL), mobility<br />

and social help was prospectively evaluated in a cohort of consecutive<br />

patients one month after TAVI. Demographic and clinical characteristics,<br />

in-hospital complications and clinical evolution were also<br />

evaluated.<br />

Results: Between January 2009 and November 2011, 57 patients<br />

were enrolled in the Cardiology Department, with a mean age of 82.2<br />

± 5.7 years. Thirty-day mortality was 12,2%. Among survivors, 58%<br />

improved cardiac symptoms, 26% improved mobility, and 15% improved<br />

autonomy for ADL but 30% increased dependency for ADL.<br />

In addition, 41% needed new social or private help for daily living.<br />

Baseline SF-12 physical summary was 36.3± 10 and baseline mental<br />

summary was 43±9.2. Both scores showed modest improvements<br />

after one month: 2.9±9.6 (p=0.04) and 2.7±11.6 (p=0.02), for physical<br />

and mental scores, respectively. The proportion of patients with relevant<br />

improvement (>2points) in physical health was 47.7%, and<br />

59.1% in mental health. No significant association between cardiac<br />

symptoms improvement and changes in quality of life was found.<br />

Conclusions: Most inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis<br />

show improvements in symptoms and quality of life one month<br />

after TAVI but the changes are modest in absolute terms and not always<br />

associated with functional improvement. Longer-term follow-up<br />

is ongoing.<br />

AGS 2012 ANNUAL MEETING<br />

S125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!