08.11.2014 Views

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P OSTER<br />

A BSTRACTS<br />

with the copy and 3 minute delayed recall portions of the RCFT using<br />

the Meyers & Meyers (1995) scoring criteria and normative data (impairment<br />

defined as performance ≤-1.5 SD below normative means).<br />

We evaluated the effects of different scoring criteria and normative<br />

data on diagnostic classification. A rater blinded to prior diagnoses<br />

rescored RCFT figures using Taylor (1969) criteria, and participants<br />

were reclassified as impaired or unimpaired using Boone et al. (1993)<br />

and Van Gorp et al. (1990) norms. Concordances between different<br />

diagnostic classifications were calculated using Cohen’s κ.<br />

Results: The proportion of participants defined as having impaired<br />

RCFT performance was dependent on which scoring criteria<br />

and normative data were used. RCFT analyses using Taylor criteria<br />

yielded higher rates of impairment with the Boone norms (copy:<br />

31.8%; recall: 27.4%) than with the Van Gorp norms (copy: 17.0%; recall:<br />

8.2%). Concordance between norms was moderate for RCFTcopy<br />

(κ=0.47) and fair for RCFT-recall (κ=0.38). Use of the Meyers &<br />

Meyers criteria and norms yielded intermediate rates of impairment<br />

on the RCFT-copy (25.8%) and recall (21.9%) subtests.<br />

Conclusions: Although the RCFT may be sensitive to cognitive<br />

impairment, the use of different normative means yielded different<br />

proportions of impaired participants. Differences seen with different<br />

normative data sets were greater than differences seen with different<br />

scoring criteria and may reflect subjective differences in scoring between<br />

studies. Investigations of inter-rater reliability with this data set<br />

are ongoing. These findings suggest that the RCFT may have limited<br />

reliability when used in isolation to identify MCI.<br />

A137<br />

Normal aging, neuroinflammation, and the brain-a sheep in wolf’s<br />

clothing?<br />

T. Harris. University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.<br />

Neuroinflammation is known to occur in clinically significant<br />

neurodegenerative processes including Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s<br />

disease. Moreover, prior studies of aging and CNS transcriptome expression<br />

have implicated neuroinflammation as a potential process<br />

observed in normal CNS aging. Our earlier work has shown that<br />

overexpression of immunne/defense-related gene transcripts may be<br />

associated with age-related loss of important functional behaviors.<br />

Since many of the gene trascripts showing age-related changes in expression<br />

are well-known molecules used by the immune system (e.g.<br />

complement, class I histocompatibility molecules, cytokines,<br />

chemokines), this process has been assumed to be neuroinflammatory<br />

as well. However, no studies have been performed to specifically<br />

localize these molecules in the microglia-the resident immune cell-of<br />

the aging brain. In the current study, I extracted and purified microglia<br />

from the hypothalamus and cerebellum of C57BL/6 and<br />

BALB/cBy mice in a minimally stressful manner. Using RT-qPCR, I<br />

measured and analyzed the expression of several inflammatory genes<br />

in microglia. I found that the expression of these genes remained similar<br />

between young, middle-aged, and aged mice, with a few genes<br />

even decreasing in expression. This finding suggests that even though<br />

CNS aging is characterized by increased expression of multiple immune<br />

transcripts, neuroinflammation is not the underlying etiology.<br />

A138<br />

Effects of Multimedia Fall Prevention Training in Persons with<br />

Dementia.<br />

V. Panzer, 1,2 J. Burleson, 1 F. Into, 2 H. Waite, 2 P. Atwood. 3 1.<br />

Community Medicine & Health Care, University of Connecticut<br />

Health Center, Farmington, CT; 2. Brookside Research &<br />

Development, North Salem, NY; 3. Dementia Care, Hebrew Health<br />

Care, West Hartford, CT.<br />

Supported By: University of Connecticut TRIPP Center<br />

Background: Persons with dementia (PwD) in long-term care<br />

(LTC) experience 4.05 falls/year compared to 2.33 for those without<br />

dementia. Falls are attributed to the lack of safety awareness and patient<br />

education is the most common intervention attempted by LTC<br />

nursing staff. We examined the influence of multimedia fall prevention<br />

(MFP) training on safety awareness in PwD as demonstrated by<br />

recognition of circumstances that could result in falls.<br />

Methods: Ten LTC residents (age 77-95,mean(M)=88;MMSE<br />

10-20,M=15; Katz ADL 1-4,M=2) with a history of falls were asked to<br />

identify ‘Fall Threats’ that could make someone fall in 5 video clips.<br />

Participants received 3-4 once-weekly 15 minute standardized MFP<br />

training sessions, incorporating a total of 3-5 multimedia vignettes<br />

which concerned daily activities and included common Fall Threats.<br />

In post-tests 3-5 weeks AFTER the last training session, participants<br />

were asked to identify Fall Threats in 5 novel video clips that did<br />

NOT include circumstances featured in pre-test clips OR in the training<br />

vignettes. Usual care nurses who were not involved in study procedures<br />

recorded falls per state regulations. Repeated-measures<br />

ANOVA was used to compare pre and post-test results and assess<br />

awareness. Fall records were examined for 2 month periods prior to,<br />

during (including the 3-5 week period before post-testing) and after<br />

the study.<br />

Results: Participants recognition of Fall Threats in 5 novel video<br />

clips improved dramatically, (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!