Here - American Geriatrics Society
Here - American Geriatrics Society
Here - American Geriatrics Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
P OSTER<br />
A BSTRACTS<br />
a different strategy than young adults to deal with a walking challenge<br />
may potentially inform interventions to improve motor skill in<br />
walking.<br />
B162<br />
Dual-Stiffness Flooring: Does it Reduce Fracture Rates Among<br />
Older Fallers ?<br />
F. Knoefel, 1 L. Patrick, 1 J. Taylor, 1 R. Goubran. 2,1 1. EBRI Research<br />
Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; 2. Engineering and Design, Carleton<br />
University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.<br />
Supported By: Satech Inc., Chehalis, WA, USA<br />
BACKGROUND: Fractures in older adults are associated with<br />
significant morbidity and mortality. Falls in this population lead to<br />
fractures approximately once every 20 falls. A number of bio-mechanical<br />
studies suggest that dual-stiffness flooring (DSF) diminishes<br />
the impact of contact with a floor, potentially reducing injuries associated<br />
with falls. To our knowledge however, there has never been a<br />
controlled study comparing fracture rates on regular flooring to that<br />
on DSF. METHODS: Mountain View Manor is a Skilled Nursing Facility<br />
in Prescott, Arizona where two resident bedrooms have DSF<br />
flooring (SmartCells flooring). Falls and related injuries were tracked<br />
during the period of July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010. Injury rate<br />
comparisons, based on Chi-Square analyses, and prediction of room<br />
type allocation based on the number of injuries sustained, using Logistic<br />
Regression, were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 167 falls<br />
were reviewed. Fifty-five percent (55%) of falls resulted in an injury<br />
and 26% in a significant injury, defined as abrasion, cut, fracture or<br />
two or more injuries. There were 82 falls on the DSF and 85 falls on<br />
the regular floor. Patients in the dual-stiffness flooring rooms were<br />
significantly younger and took significantly fewer medications; these<br />
factors were thus treated as covariates in the analyses. There was a<br />
marked tendency for residents falling on DSF to have less bruising<br />
and abrasions, while having more redness and cuts. There were two<br />
fractures on regular flooring (2.4% fracture rate) and none on the<br />
DSF flooring (0% fracture rate). DISCUSSION: A 2.4% fracture<br />
rate (as noted on the regular floor) is consistent with numerous incidence<br />
reports in the literature; whereas a 0% rate (as noted on Smart-<br />
Cells DSF floor) is a clinically significant improvement over prior reported<br />
results. Both clinical findings and preliminary statistical trends<br />
analysis suggest a positive effect of dual-stiffness flooring. This suggests<br />
that DSF may be a practical approach for institutions and consumers<br />
to reduce fall-related injuries. In contrast to other solutions,<br />
like hip protectors, DSF requires no active client participation. A<br />
large scale study to achieve sufficient statistical power to statistically<br />
confirm these preliminary findings is warranted.<br />
B163<br />
Subcortical Hyperintensities and Outcomes of Targeted Gait<br />
Interventions for Mobility Impairment.<br />
N. K. Nadkarni, S. Perera, J. Brach, H. Aizenstein, C. Rosano,<br />
S. A. Studenski, J. M. Van Swearingen. University of Pittsburgh,<br />
Pittsburgh, PA.<br />
Supported By: Source of funding: Pittsburgh Claude D. Pepper<br />
Older <strong>American</strong>’s Independence Center grant (P30 AG024827)<br />
Background: Gait interventions that incorporate motor-skill acquisition<br />
are superior to standard therapy in improving mobility impairment<br />
in elderly. Subcortical hyperintensities (SH), commonly<br />
seen on brain MRI of older adults, are associated with impairments in<br />
gait and executive function.<br />
Objective: We examined whether regional SH volumes influence<br />
gait outcomes from two types of gait interventions.<br />
Methods: We analyzed data from a 12 week randomized trial of<br />
community-dwelling older adults with mobility impairment receiving<br />
two interventions: progressive strength, balance and endurance training<br />
(I) vs goal-directed motor learning, adaptive stepping, pattern<br />
walking and dual-tasking (M). A linear model was used to study the<br />
relationship between pre- to post-intervention change in outcomes<br />
(gait speed, double-support time, step-time, stance time variability)<br />
with baseline SH in regions associated with executive function (anterior<br />
prefrontal cortex (APC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex<br />
(DLPFC), ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), anterior cingulate<br />
(AC), basal ganglia and posterior parietal cortex).<br />
Results: Significant interactions emerged between right APC<br />
SH and intervention on changes in gait speed (p=0.04), step-time<br />
(p=0.001) and double-support time (p=0.01). With respect to steptime<br />
change, significant interactions emerged for SH in left APC<br />
(p=0.02), right and left DLPFC (p=0.03 and 0.02), right VLPFC<br />
(p=0.04) and right AC (p=0.02) with intervention. In the I-group,<br />
greater right APC and right AC SH were associated with poorer<br />
changes in gait speed (p=0.005 and 0.02), double support time<br />
(p=0.002 and 0.001), step-time (p=0.002 and 0.001) and variability in<br />
stance-time (p=0.004 and 0.01). In the M-group, there were no significant<br />
associations between changes in outcomes and SH in any of the<br />
above brain regions.<br />
Conclusion: Gait interventions that incorporate motor-skill acquisition<br />
and dual-tasking may benefit older adults irrespective of SH<br />
severity in brain regions linked to executive function while benefits<br />
from impairment-based interventions may depend on SH burden in<br />
these regions.<br />
B164<br />
Mood and Neurocognitive Measures to Predict Intake and Function<br />
in Elderly in a Recuperative Care Unit.<br />
P. R. Padala, 1,3 P. Dubbert, 1,3 K. P. Padala, 1,2 K. Garner, 1,2<br />
R. A. Dennis, 1,2 M. Bopp, 1,2 D. H. Sullivan. 1,2 1. Geriatric Research<br />
Education and Clinical Center, VISN16/CAVHS, North Little Rock,<br />
AR; 2. <strong>Geriatrics</strong>, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little<br />
Rock, AR; 3. Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences,<br />
Little Rock, AR.<br />
Supported By: VA Health Services and Clinical Science Research<br />
and Development programs (HSR&D IIR-04-298 and CSR&D)<br />
and a University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Tobacco<br />
Settlement award<br />
Background: Among older patients hospitalized for recuperative<br />
care and rehabilitation, persistent anorexia and poor functional<br />
rehabilitation are associated with high levels of inflammatory markers<br />
and other indicators of illness severity at admission. It is not<br />
known whether cognitive dysfunction or depression also contribute<br />
to the persistent anorexia and poor functional outcomes.<br />
Methods: This prospective study included patients over 64 years<br />
admitted to a recuperative care and rehabilitation unit in a VA hospital<br />
Community Living Center. Each subject’s daily total nutrient intake<br />
from all sources was measured using a standardized protocol.<br />
Depression was measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 items<br />
(GDS), apathy was derived from 3 items on the GDS related to motivation<br />
(GDS-apathy), and executive function was measured by verbal<br />
fluency, digit span and Florida praxis battery. Correlation analyses<br />
were performed between the dependent variables of energy and protein<br />
intake with independent variables of mood and neurocognitive<br />
measures followed by regression analyses. T-tests were performed on<br />
the neurocognitive measures based on if the subjects were apathetic<br />
or not.<br />
Results: 416 veterans were enrolled. Mean scores at baseline<br />
were 3.7 (± 2.7) for GDS, 1.5 (±0.9) for GDS-apathy, 5.9 (±3.7) for<br />
Verbal Fluency-F, 7.4 (±2.5) for Digit Span Forward, 4.6 (±2.2) for<br />
Digit Span Backwards, 14.6 (±1.4) for Florida Praxis Battery, 83.8<br />
(±35.7) and 59.7 (±23.6)for Average Energy and Protein Intake respectively.<br />
Baseline measures of apathy, depression, executive function<br />
did not predict either energy or protein intake. However baseline<br />
AGS 2012 ANNUAL MEETING<br />
S129