08.11.2014 Views

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P APER<br />

A BSTRACTS<br />

management in collaboration with primary care (PCP) improved care<br />

quality and reduced acute care utilization for seniors at high risk of<br />

hospitalization.<br />

Objective: To assess the impact of GRACE Team Care on hospital<br />

readmissions in older veterans at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center<br />

(VAMC).<br />

Methods: Veterans 65 or older with PCPs from 4 of 5 VAMC<br />

clinics were enrolled following discharge home from an acute hospitalization<br />

on the medicine service from April 2010 to June 2011. After<br />

an initial home-based transition visit, a nurse practitioner and social<br />

worker (GRACE Team) returned to conduct a geriatric assessment<br />

visit. Guided by 12 geriatric protocols and input from the GRACE<br />

geriatrician, pharmacist, and psychologist, the GRACE Team developed<br />

a veteran-centric care plan and collaborated with the PCP to<br />

implement that plan. Hospitalized veterans with PCPs from the fifth<br />

VAMC clinic that did not get GRACE but who otherwise met enrollment<br />

criteria served as a comparison group. Data on demographics,<br />

comorbidity, hospital utilization, and mortality were drawn from VA<br />

databases.<br />

Results: 174 veterans (mean age 78 years, range 65-97; 97%<br />

male) were enrolled in GRACE and followed for an average of 8.5<br />

months (range 0.4-15.5), and 77 veterans (mean age 77 years, range<br />

65-93; 94% male) in the comparison group were followed for an average<br />

of 8.6 months (range 0.4-16.0). Charlson Comorbidity Index<br />

scores were similar between groups: GRACE mean 2.40 (range 0-13)<br />

vs. comparison mean 2.17 (range 0-10). GRACE veterans vs. comparison<br />

had lower readmission rates at 7 days (2/174 [1.1%] vs. 5/77<br />

[6.5%], p=0.03); 14 days (8/174 [4.6%] vs. 7/77 [9.1%], p=0.25); 30<br />

days (17/174 [9.8%] vs. 13/77 [16.9%], p=0.11); and 60 days (26/164<br />

[15.9%] vs. 17/73 [23.3%], p=0.17). Over the follow-up period,<br />

GRACE veterans had a lower mortality rate than the comparison<br />

group (17/174 [10%] vs. 13/77 [17%], p=0.11).<br />

Conclusion: GRACE Team Care, which provided in-home, veteran-centric,<br />

geriatric care management while supporting VA primary<br />

care, had a positive impact on reducing hospital readmissions.<br />

GRACE may offer an opportunity for better care at lower costs in<br />

high risk older veterans.<br />

P15<br />

The Falls and Fractures Clinic: Testing an Integrated Model of<br />

Secondary Prevention in a High-Risk Older Population.<br />

G. Duque, 1,2 P. Suriyaarachchi, 1,2 D. Boersma, 1,2 O. Demontiero, 1,2<br />

G. Loza-Diaz, 1 A. Sharma. 2 1. Ageing Bone Research Program, The<br />

University of Sydney, Penrith, NSW, Australia; 2. Geriatric Medicine,<br />

Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia.<br />

Supported By: Nepean Medical Research Foundation<br />

INTRODUCTION: Although falls and fractures are highly<br />

prevalent in older persons, there is still a fragmentation in terms of<br />

falls being assessed by geriatricians and fractures remaining within<br />

the scope of other specialties. Therefore, an integrated model of secondary<br />

prevention for falls and fractures run by geriatricians is highly<br />

needed.<br />

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary<br />

Falls and Fractures Clinic as an optimal integrated model to assess<br />

risk and to prevent new events in a high-risk older population.<br />

METHODS: Four hundred and thirty subjects (mean age=82,<br />

65% female) were assessed between January 2009-June 2011 at the<br />

Falls and Fractures Clinic, Nepean Hospital (Penrith, NSW, Australia).<br />

Assessment included fear of falling (SAFFE), risk factors for<br />

falls and fractures, physical examination, nutrition, depression, grip<br />

strength (dynamometer), densitometry, posturography (Medicaa,<br />

Uruguay), gait parameters (GaitRITE®), and blood tests for secondary<br />

causes of osteoporosis including vitamin D and parathyroid hormone<br />

(PTH). An integrated plan was then designed according to the<br />

subject’s risk factors. Subjects were surveyed by phone (month 3) and<br />

fully re-assessed at the clinic nine months later.<br />

RESULTS: 77% had suffered a fall and 38% had suffered a fracture<br />

before the assessment. An average of 6.5+/-2.8 falls and 3.5+/-1.8<br />

fracture risk factors were identified per subject. At the time of the<br />

second assessment, the incidence of falls was reduced in -<br />

65%(p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!