08.11.2014 Views

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P OSTER<br />

A BSTRACTS<br />

with the least efficacy and greatest potential for short term<br />

ADR(e.g.diphenhydramine) may be most amenable to this type of<br />

alert system. Follow up studies to test such systems are warranted.<br />

Ref:<br />

1. Kennedy LD et al. Double-blind trial of acetaminophen vs<br />

diphenhydramine pretransfusion. Transfusion 2008;48:2285-91.<br />

2011 vs 2010 and 2009<br />

C101<br />

Assessment of knowledge gaps relevant to antibiotic stewardship<br />

among health care workers in long term care facilities.<br />

A. Krishna, 1,2 C. Biedron, 2 L. Mody, 5 P. Lichtenberg, 3 R. Severson, 2<br />

C. Cassidy, 3 C. M. Pickney, 4 K. S. Kaye, 1,2 T. Chopra, 1,2 M. Johnson. 4 1.<br />

Infectious Disease, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI; 2. Infectious<br />

Disease, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; 3. Nexcare Health<br />

System, Westland, MI; 4. Dominican Life Center, Westland, MI; 5.<br />

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.<br />

Background: Long Term Care Facilities (LTCFs) provide a<br />

major reservoir for multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs), however<br />

standard Antibiotic Stewardship Programs (ASPs) are lacking in<br />

most LTCFs. The objective of our survey was to identify knowledge<br />

gaps of health care workers [HCWs] relevant to antibiotic stewardship<br />

(AS) at LTCFs.<br />

Methods: A 71 item voluntary survey was completed by health<br />

care workers in August 2011 at two LTCFs (Dominican Life Center a<br />

174 bed facility and Nexcare Health System, a 111 bed facility) in<br />

South East Michigan.<br />

Results: 44 HCWs (36 nurses, 4 infection control professionals, 2<br />

physician assistants and 1 staff physician) responded to the survey.<br />

Mean age of respondents was 42 + 14 and 93% were females. 61% of<br />

respondents believed that over prescribing of antibiotics was a very<br />

important cause of antibiotic resistance. Most respondents believed<br />

that prescriber education [51%], institution specific guidelines [54%]<br />

or accessible advice from infectious disease physician [58%] were effective<br />

interventions in reducing antibiotic resistance.<br />

100% of the respondents were familiar with methicillin-resistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA], 73% were familiar with vancomycin-resistant<br />

enterococci [VRE], 34% were familiar with Klebsiella<br />

pneumoniae carbapenemase [KPC] and 27% were familiar with<br />

extended-spectrum beta lactamase [ESBL]. Percentage of respondents<br />

confident in caring for a patient with MRSA, VRE, KPC and<br />

ESBL were 98, 95, 56 and 47 respectively. 30% and 26% of the respondents<br />

were not familiar with differences between definitions of<br />

colonization and infection respectively.<br />

Conclusions: Significant knowledge gaps among HCWs remain,<br />

specifically related to treating infections with KPCs and ESBLs. Educating<br />

HCWs on the differences between colonization and true infection<br />

is crucial. Formal ASPs are urgently needed in LTCFs to optimize<br />

antibiotic use and decrease colonization pressure by MDROs.<br />

C102<br />

Staff Responses to Resident-to-Resident Elder Mistreatment in<br />

Nursing Homes: Results of a Multi-Site Survey.<br />

A. Rosen, 1,2 M. S. Lachs, 1 K. Pillemer, 3 J. Teresi. 4,5 1. Medicine,<br />

<strong>Geriatrics</strong>, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; 2. Emegency<br />

Medicine Residency, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY;<br />

3. Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY; 4. Research<br />

Division, Hebrew Home at Riverdale, Riverdale, NY; 5. Columbia<br />

University Stroud Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute,<br />

New York, NY.<br />

Background: Resident-to-resident elder mistreatment (RREM)<br />

in nursing homes is a likely frequent phenomenon that may lead to<br />

severe outcomes for victims and perpetrators. Nursing home staff actions<br />

in response to this behavior may significantly mitigate its impact,<br />

but little is known about prevention and management strategies.<br />

Objective:To identify the most common staff responses to RREM<br />

Methods: We conducted this study as part of a large, multisite<br />

NIA-funded study attempting to estimate the prevalence of RREM<br />

in long term care facilities. For this project, the behavior of 1,688 residents<br />

of 5 nursing homes in New York City was evaluated. Certified<br />

nursing assistants primarily responsible for the care of residents<br />

under study in the parent project were asked about their responses to<br />

RREM during the previous two weeks. A modification of a validated<br />

instrument initially created to measure behavioral problems in nursing<br />

home residents was used.<br />

Results: Staff reported taking some action for RREM incidents<br />

involving 277 residents (16.4%) during the previous two weeks, and<br />

22 different responses were described. Most common responses were:<br />

physically intervening / separating residents (84), talking calmly to<br />

settle residents down (65), and verbally intervening to defuse the situation<br />

(59). Not included among staff responses was requesting consultation<br />

of a physician or psychiatrist.<br />

Conclusion: RREM is a potentially common and dangerous occurrence,<br />

and nursing home staff report many varied responses to it.<br />

Despite this, physicians and psychiatrists are seldom called upon to<br />

assist in RREM prevention and management. The effectiveness of existing<br />

responses and the potential for physician contribution needs to<br />

be examined in greater detail, and comprehensive evidence-based interventions<br />

should be developed.<br />

C103<br />

Care Delivery Consequences of Poor Quality Hospital-to-Skilled<br />

Nursing Facility Transitions: A Qualitative Study.<br />

B. King, 1 A. Kind, 2 A. Gilmore, 1 R. Roiland, 1 K. Pecanac, 1<br />

M. Hovanes, 1 N. Husain, 2 B. Bowers. 1 1. Nursing, University of<br />

Wisconsin, Madison, WI; 2. Medicine, University of Wisconsin,<br />

Madison, WI.<br />

Supported By: This study is funded by a NIA Beeson K23 Award<br />

Background: Poorly executed, transitions from the hospital to<br />

home can result in care fragmentation and lapses in patient safety.<br />

Research has focused on transitions from hospital to home with few<br />

studies on the highly vulnerable population: older adults transferring<br />

from the hospital to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). Nurses in SNFs<br />

design a resident’s plan of care based on orders/information received<br />

from the hospital physician and nursing staff. The purpose of this<br />

study is to explore how nurses in SNFs transition care of residents admitted<br />

from hospitals, the barriers they experience and their views of<br />

the consequences of poor quality care transitions.<br />

Methods: This qualitative study utilized Grounded Dimensional<br />

Analysis, a variant of Grounded Theory. Registered nurses (n=9) employed<br />

at 3 SNFs in Wisconsin participated in focus groups with indepth<br />

interviews. Constant comparisons were used to expand the<br />

richness of the data. Data was analyzed using open, axial and selective<br />

coding.<br />

Results: Nurses in SNFs engage in a complex process of getting<br />

prepared to transition residents from hospital-to-SNFs. Despite this<br />

complex preparation, the information SNF nurses receive from the<br />

hospital is often incorrect or incomplete. Nurses cited multiple inadequacies<br />

of hospital discharge information, including regular problems<br />

with medication orders (including the lack of opiod prescriptions for<br />

pain), little information on resident’s psychosocial/functional history,<br />

and inaccurate information regarding the resident’s current health<br />

status. These inadequacies necessitated repeated call backs to the discharging<br />

hospital, created delays in care delivery to SNF residents<br />

(including delays in pain control), increased SNF staff stress and frustrated<br />

patients/family members. SNF nurses identified a specific list<br />

of information/components that they need to initiate a high-quality<br />

SNF plan of care.<br />

S166<br />

AGS 2012 ANNUAL MEETING

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!