Here - American Geriatrics Society
Here - American Geriatrics Society
Here - American Geriatrics Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
P OSTER<br />
A BSTRACTS<br />
derstanding the patient’s medical history, baseline cognitive and<br />
physical functionality, home medications, and social situation.<br />
Conclusion:<br />
CIR served as a useful tool to assess interns’ learning in a geriatrics<br />
rotation. Interns appear to be gaining knowledge and skills in<br />
keys areas of <strong>Geriatrics</strong> and are able to articulate how they would<br />
use these knowledge and skills in the future to better care for elderly<br />
patients.<br />
D53<br />
WWAMI Residency Graduates’ Self-reported Preparedness and<br />
Practice Before and After Implementation of a Family Medicine<br />
Residency Continuity Nursing Home Requirement.<br />
J. Raetz, J. Osborn, P. Ford, N. Stevens. Family Medicine, University of<br />
Washington, Seattle, WA.<br />
Background:<br />
Current GME programs will not produce enough geriatricians<br />
to meet the needs of the aging population. Primary care physicians<br />
must receive adequate training to fill this gap. In 2005 the Accreditation<br />
Council for Graduate Medical Education revised the requirements<br />
for family medicine residency training programs to include a<br />
two year continuity nursing home experience. Residents must care<br />
for at least two nursing home patients over a minimum of 24 consecutive<br />
months. The WWAMI Network consists of 18 family medicine<br />
residencies in Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho.<br />
The WWAMII region routinely surveys graduates from the residency<br />
network to characterize preparedness and practice. We examined this<br />
survey data to see if any measurable change could be seen in graduate<br />
preparedness and practice after implementation of the new nursing<br />
home continuity requirement.<br />
Methods:<br />
We examined responses to the questions, “prepared for practice?”<br />
(5 point likert scale) and, “part of my practice?” (yes/no) under<br />
the section, “care of adults: nursing home” for graduates between the<br />
years 1997 and 2009. We then compared responses of physicians who<br />
graduated in 2007 or later with those who graduated prior to 2007.<br />
Results:<br />
Overall self-reported preparedness for nursing home practice<br />
was good and improved slightly after implementation of the ACGME<br />
requirement for a nursing home continuity experience. 795 graduates<br />
between 1997 and 2006 reported level of preparedness for nursing<br />
home care on the five point likert scale (average 3.51). 243 graduates<br />
between 2007 and 2009 reported level of preparedness for nursing<br />
home care on the five point likert scale (average 3.81). Practice in<br />
nursing homes decreased in the same time period. Of the 738 responses<br />
of graduates between 1997 and 2006, 46.39% practiced in<br />
nursing homes. Of the 233 responses of graduates between 2007 and<br />
2009, 28.01% practiced in nursing homes.<br />
Conclusions:<br />
A two year continuity nursing home experience in residency is<br />
associated with improvement in self-reported preparedness to practice<br />
in nursing homes. However, in the same time period fewer graduates<br />
are practicing in nursing homes. More research is needed to identify<br />
factors that increase the number of physicians practicing in<br />
nursing homes to better serve our aging population.<br />
D54<br />
Preferences, Availability, And Quality Of Interactive Teaching<br />
Materials Used By Geriatric Educators.<br />
J. D. Schlaudecker, 1 S. Talebreza, 2 W. Suen, 3 K. Anderson. 2 1.<br />
<strong>Geriatrics</strong>, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; 2. <strong>Geriatrics</strong>,<br />
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; 3. <strong>Geriatrics</strong>, Boston<br />
University, Boston, MA.<br />
Supported By: Reynolds Foundation<br />
GACA<br />
Background:<br />
The use of an interactive educational format has been shown to<br />
improve integration of learned material. However few studies have<br />
evaluated if geriatric educators are actually embracing this philosophy,<br />
utilizing interactive teaching techniques in educational venues,<br />
and which techniques are more commonly used.<br />
Methods:<br />
A cross-sectional sampling, using a 26-question Internet ‘Survey<br />
Monkey’ survey, of geriatric educators contacted through <strong>American</strong><br />
<strong>Geriatrics</strong> <strong>Society</strong> listservs was performed. Participant demographics<br />
and attitudes towards use of interactive educational modalities such<br />
as video clips, games, role-play, and creative writing were assessed<br />
during a two-week period in November 2011. Data was analyzed<br />
across response categories.<br />
Results:<br />
141 physicians responded. 64% had a CAQ in Geriatric Medicine.<br />
43% were past/present GACA recipients. 42% spent between ¼<br />
and ½ of time teaching a broad array of learners. 99% agreed with the<br />
statement: “I believe that trainees prefer interactive educational activities.”<br />
Results demonstrated a very high preference for interactive<br />
educational formats, but a much lower rating of quantity and quality<br />
of available resources. For example: 95% agreed with the statement:<br />
“I believe video clips may capture the trainees attention better than<br />
traditional lecture format”, but 63% felt the videos currently available<br />
were of insufficient quantity and quality, and 31% had created<br />
their own video materials. We will also present differences between<br />
GACA awardees, geriatricians, and different academic ranks in use of<br />
interactive educational techniques.<br />
Conclusion:<br />
Educators in graduate medical education routinely utilize a variety<br />
of interactive teaching techniques in diverse teaching settings,<br />
yet the majority of educators felt the number of interactive resources<br />
available were insufficient to meet their teaching needs. Promoting<br />
online educational resource sites, such as POGOe, and encouraging<br />
educators to submit interactive teaching material to these sites may<br />
facilitate the increased use of more effective interactive teaching<br />
techniques.<br />
D55<br />
A Training Model to Strengthen Team-based Primary Care for<br />
Older Rural Veterans.<br />
J. L. Howe, 1,2 J. L. Griffith. 1,2 1. <strong>Geriatrics</strong> and Palliative Medicine,<br />
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; 2. GRECC, James J.<br />
Peter VAMC, Bronx, NY.<br />
There is a severe shortage of healthcare professionals and interdisciplinary<br />
teams trained to provide services for the growing population<br />
of older <strong>American</strong>s. Forty percent of Veterans live in rural areas<br />
and require specialized geriatrics care, but rural practitioners are<br />
often not equipped with the knowledge and team training needed to<br />
serve complex healthcare needs. The Rural Interdisciplinary Team<br />
Training (RITT) Program, a component of the VHA Office of Rural<br />
Health Geriatric Scholars Program, strengthens interprofessional<br />
teams to better serve older adults at rural VA Community Based<br />
Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) through a multi-modal educational intervention.<br />
Potential RITT training sites are identified through Scholars<br />
who participate in the educational program which includes attendance<br />
at an intensive geriatrics course and a quality improvement<br />
project. CBOC staff participate in team-based training to enhance<br />
communication, leadership, collaboration, conflict resolution, and<br />
problem solving skills in the care of older Veterans. Piloted in 2011,<br />
the RITT Program trained a total of 68 providers from five separate<br />
teams in rural clinics located in NYS, AZ, CA, WI and AR. The validated<br />
Team Development Measure is disseminated 30 days before<br />
and 30 days after the training intervention in order to assess team cohesion,<br />
communication, roles, and goals. For the RITT in WI, there<br />
was an average increase of 15.4% on practitioners’ self-rated levels of<br />
team development. Practitioners also complete a form 30 days after<br />
the training asking what changes are made in their practice as a result<br />
AGS 2012 ANNUAL MEETING<br />
S205