08.11.2014 Views

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P OSTER<br />

A BSTRACTS<br />

derstanding the patient’s medical history, baseline cognitive and<br />

physical functionality, home medications, and social situation.<br />

Conclusion:<br />

CIR served as a useful tool to assess interns’ learning in a geriatrics<br />

rotation. Interns appear to be gaining knowledge and skills in<br />

keys areas of <strong>Geriatrics</strong> and are able to articulate how they would<br />

use these knowledge and skills in the future to better care for elderly<br />

patients.<br />

D53<br />

WWAMI Residency Graduates’ Self-reported Preparedness and<br />

Practice Before and After Implementation of a Family Medicine<br />

Residency Continuity Nursing Home Requirement.<br />

J. Raetz, J. Osborn, P. Ford, N. Stevens. Family Medicine, University of<br />

Washington, Seattle, WA.<br />

Background:<br />

Current GME programs will not produce enough geriatricians<br />

to meet the needs of the aging population. Primary care physicians<br />

must receive adequate training to fill this gap. In 2005 the Accreditation<br />

Council for Graduate Medical Education revised the requirements<br />

for family medicine residency training programs to include a<br />

two year continuity nursing home experience. Residents must care<br />

for at least two nursing home patients over a minimum of 24 consecutive<br />

months. The WWAMI Network consists of 18 family medicine<br />

residencies in Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho.<br />

The WWAMII region routinely surveys graduates from the residency<br />

network to characterize preparedness and practice. We examined this<br />

survey data to see if any measurable change could be seen in graduate<br />

preparedness and practice after implementation of the new nursing<br />

home continuity requirement.<br />

Methods:<br />

We examined responses to the questions, “prepared for practice?”<br />

(5 point likert scale) and, “part of my practice?” (yes/no) under<br />

the section, “care of adults: nursing home” for graduates between the<br />

years 1997 and 2009. We then compared responses of physicians who<br />

graduated in 2007 or later with those who graduated prior to 2007.<br />

Results:<br />

Overall self-reported preparedness for nursing home practice<br />

was good and improved slightly after implementation of the ACGME<br />

requirement for a nursing home continuity experience. 795 graduates<br />

between 1997 and 2006 reported level of preparedness for nursing<br />

home care on the five point likert scale (average 3.51). 243 graduates<br />

between 2007 and 2009 reported level of preparedness for nursing<br />

home care on the five point likert scale (average 3.81). Practice in<br />

nursing homes decreased in the same time period. Of the 738 responses<br />

of graduates between 1997 and 2006, 46.39% practiced in<br />

nursing homes. Of the 233 responses of graduates between 2007 and<br />

2009, 28.01% practiced in nursing homes.<br />

Conclusions:<br />

A two year continuity nursing home experience in residency is<br />

associated with improvement in self-reported preparedness to practice<br />

in nursing homes. However, in the same time period fewer graduates<br />

are practicing in nursing homes. More research is needed to identify<br />

factors that increase the number of physicians practicing in<br />

nursing homes to better serve our aging population.<br />

D54<br />

Preferences, Availability, And Quality Of Interactive Teaching<br />

Materials Used By Geriatric Educators.<br />

J. D. Schlaudecker, 1 S. Talebreza, 2 W. Suen, 3 K. Anderson. 2 1.<br />

<strong>Geriatrics</strong>, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; 2. <strong>Geriatrics</strong>,<br />

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; 3. <strong>Geriatrics</strong>, Boston<br />

University, Boston, MA.<br />

Supported By: Reynolds Foundation<br />

GACA<br />

Background:<br />

The use of an interactive educational format has been shown to<br />

improve integration of learned material. However few studies have<br />

evaluated if geriatric educators are actually embracing this philosophy,<br />

utilizing interactive teaching techniques in educational venues,<br />

and which techniques are more commonly used.<br />

Methods:<br />

A cross-sectional sampling, using a 26-question Internet ‘Survey<br />

Monkey’ survey, of geriatric educators contacted through <strong>American</strong><br />

<strong>Geriatrics</strong> <strong>Society</strong> listservs was performed. Participant demographics<br />

and attitudes towards use of interactive educational modalities such<br />

as video clips, games, role-play, and creative writing were assessed<br />

during a two-week period in November 2011. Data was analyzed<br />

across response categories.<br />

Results:<br />

141 physicians responded. 64% had a CAQ in Geriatric Medicine.<br />

43% were past/present GACA recipients. 42% spent between ¼<br />

and ½ of time teaching a broad array of learners. 99% agreed with the<br />

statement: “I believe that trainees prefer interactive educational activities.”<br />

Results demonstrated a very high preference for interactive<br />

educational formats, but a much lower rating of quantity and quality<br />

of available resources. For example: 95% agreed with the statement:<br />

“I believe video clips may capture the trainees attention better than<br />

traditional lecture format”, but 63% felt the videos currently available<br />

were of insufficient quantity and quality, and 31% had created<br />

their own video materials. We will also present differences between<br />

GACA awardees, geriatricians, and different academic ranks in use of<br />

interactive educational techniques.<br />

Conclusion:<br />

Educators in graduate medical education routinely utilize a variety<br />

of interactive teaching techniques in diverse teaching settings,<br />

yet the majority of educators felt the number of interactive resources<br />

available were insufficient to meet their teaching needs. Promoting<br />

online educational resource sites, such as POGOe, and encouraging<br />

educators to submit interactive teaching material to these sites may<br />

facilitate the increased use of more effective interactive teaching<br />

techniques.<br />

D55<br />

A Training Model to Strengthen Team-based Primary Care for<br />

Older Rural Veterans.<br />

J. L. Howe, 1,2 J. L. Griffith. 1,2 1. <strong>Geriatrics</strong> and Palliative Medicine,<br />

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; 2. GRECC, James J.<br />

Peter VAMC, Bronx, NY.<br />

There is a severe shortage of healthcare professionals and interdisciplinary<br />

teams trained to provide services for the growing population<br />

of older <strong>American</strong>s. Forty percent of Veterans live in rural areas<br />

and require specialized geriatrics care, but rural practitioners are<br />

often not equipped with the knowledge and team training needed to<br />

serve complex healthcare needs. The Rural Interdisciplinary Team<br />

Training (RITT) Program, a component of the VHA Office of Rural<br />

Health Geriatric Scholars Program, strengthens interprofessional<br />

teams to better serve older adults at rural VA Community Based<br />

Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) through a multi-modal educational intervention.<br />

Potential RITT training sites are identified through Scholars<br />

who participate in the educational program which includes attendance<br />

at an intensive geriatrics course and a quality improvement<br />

project. CBOC staff participate in team-based training to enhance<br />

communication, leadership, collaboration, conflict resolution, and<br />

problem solving skills in the care of older Veterans. Piloted in 2011,<br />

the RITT Program trained a total of 68 providers from five separate<br />

teams in rural clinics located in NYS, AZ, CA, WI and AR. The validated<br />

Team Development Measure is disseminated 30 days before<br />

and 30 days after the training intervention in order to assess team cohesion,<br />

communication, roles, and goals. For the RITT in WI, there<br />

was an average increase of 15.4% on practitioners’ self-rated levels of<br />

team development. Practitioners also complete a form 30 days after<br />

the training asking what changes are made in their practice as a result<br />

AGS 2012 ANNUAL MEETING<br />

S205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!