08.11.2014 Views

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P OSTER<br />

A BSTRACTS<br />

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of a subset of the Canadian<br />

Study of Health and Aging (1996 wave) that completed a diagnostic<br />

cognitive assessment. Non-cancer pain was measured<br />

using the 5-point verbal descriptor scale, dichotomized into<br />

“no/very mild” versus “moderate” or greater pain. Cognitive status<br />

was clinically assessed and categorized as NCI, cognitive impairment<br />

no dementia (CIND), Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), and<br />

vascular dementia (VaD). Multivariable logistic regression was<br />

utilized to analyze the relationship between pain report and cognitive<br />

diagnosis controlling for covariates (demographics, comorbidity,<br />

IADL’s, and depression).<br />

Results: 1,658 (96.7%) of participants that completed a diagnostic<br />

cognitive assessment had their cognitive status designated and a<br />

pain measure completed. Overall, the frequency of pain report varied<br />

with cognitive status among the four groups, (Chi-square 9.16,<br />

p=0.02). 34.7% (263/757) of persons with NCI reported moderate or<br />

greater pain, compared to 39.1% (223/570) CIND (p=0.11), 28.5%<br />

(73/256) AD (p=0.08), and 40% (26/65) VaD (p=0.42). In the fullyadjusted<br />

multivariate model, compared with persons with NCI, the<br />

odds of reporting moderate or higher pain was not significantly different<br />

among persons with CIND OR=0.86 (0.65,1.13; p=0.28), AD<br />

OR=0.68 (0.44,1.04; p=0.08), or VaD OR=0.80 (0.36,1.80; p=0.59).<br />

Conclusion: A noteworthy proportion of older adults with and<br />

without dementia report moderate or greater pain and did not vary<br />

with cognitive status. Given that dementia represents a consistent risk<br />

factor the under identification and undertreatment of pain, efforts to<br />

improve pain management in this vulnerable population remain a<br />

high priority for future research.<br />

D151<br />

Help seeking for incontinence by adults with heart failure.<br />

K. Lindeman, 1 Y. Li, 2 M. H. Palmer. 2 1. University of North Carolina<br />

School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; 2. School of Nursing, University<br />

of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.<br />

Supported By: Detrol Clinical Research Program, 2005-2007;<br />

MSTAR, 2011 <strong>American</strong> Federation for Aging Research<br />

Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) and heart failure (HF)<br />

are both prevalent conditions that have significant impact on quality<br />

of life, but little information is available about HF patients seeking<br />

help for urinary incontinence. The objective of this study is to identify<br />

patient factors associated with help-seeking for UI in HF patients.<br />

Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional<br />

data collected between 2005 and 2007 in a 22 bed hospital unit and 2<br />

out-patient clinics for HF. Two hundred ninety six men and women<br />

that were 20 years or older with HF diagnosis participated in the original<br />

81-item survey. UI help-seeking was defined as an affirmative response<br />

to a single item on reporting UI to a doctor or nurse. Incontinence<br />

Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7) and the Urogenital Distress<br />

Inventory-6 (UDI-6) were used to assess level of impact of UI on<br />

quality of life.<br />

Results: 134 (45%) participants (median age 62 years; 45.5%<br />

male) had UI, 60 (44.8%) had at least two other urinary symptoms,<br />

and 45 (34%) sought help for UI. Bivariate analyses revealed that<br />

IIQ-7, UDI-6, presence of other urinary symptoms, and interaction<br />

between sex and age were significantly associated with help-seeking<br />

at p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!