Here - American Geriatrics Society
Here - American Geriatrics Society
Here - American Geriatrics Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
P OSTER<br />
A BSTRACTS<br />
D102<br />
Clinician’s perception of infections and laboratory utilization at a<br />
long term care facility.<br />
J. Kopacz, 1,5 P. D. Sychangco, 2 D. Russo, 2,5 Z. Huang, 2,5 N. Mariano, 1,3<br />
C. Urban, 1,3 S. Segal-Maurer. 1,4 1. Infectious Diseases Section, NYHQ,<br />
Flushing, NY; 2. <strong>Geriatrics</strong> Division, NYHQ, Flushing, NY; 3.<br />
Microbiology, NYHQ, Flushing, NY; 4. Medicine, Weill Cornell<br />
Medical College, New York, NY; 5. SCNR, Briarwood, NY.<br />
Introduction<br />
Infectious Diseases (ID) consults are not readily available in<br />
long term care facilities (LTCFs). This study assesses clinician perception<br />
of incidence and prevalence of infections, laboratory utilization<br />
and use of antibiotics at a LTCF.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
A two-step study was conducted at a 320-bed, hospital-affiliated<br />
LTCF: 1. Six month retrospective analysis of all microbiologic specimens<br />
; 2. 14 question IRB approved survey assessing number of patients<br />
treated, use of diagnostic tests, perceived frequency of infections,<br />
and choice of antibiotics. Answer choices included “never,<br />
rarely, sometimes, often, always.” Clinicians did not have access to retrospective<br />
laboratory data collection.<br />
Results<br />
All 11 LTCF healthcare (HCWs) providers (9 MDs, 2 RNP)<br />
completed the survey. Blood tests were ordered with a change in<br />
physical exam by 8 HCWs “often” and 3 “always” (chest radiographs<br />
infrequently). All HCWs stated urine infections were most common<br />
and they “always” ordered urinalysis (UA) to accompany urine cultures<br />
(UCx). Of 435 UCx specimens, 264 (61%) were positive. Of<br />
these, 236 (89.4%) had an accompanying UA (85% positive). Six<br />
HCWs ordered blood cultures (BCx) “often” and all stated “sometimes”<br />
or “rarely” found the results helpful. Of 167 patients who had<br />
BCxs, 13 (7.7%) were positive with 3 (1.8%) considered true bacteremia<br />
(6 of 13 patients received unnecessary treatment). Perceived<br />
C difficile infection (CDI) prevalence was over 25% and all HCWs<br />
“often” ordered CDI assays. Of 889 CDI assays sent, 94 (11%) were<br />
positive (by ELISA). In spite of CDI concern, fluoroquinolones were<br />
the most frequently prescribed antibiotics. All HCWs stated they<br />
would use an antibiogram if available.<br />
Conclusions<br />
Positive UAs correlated well with positive UCx, obviating use of<br />
routine UAs for all patients. BCx were rarely positive and not clinically<br />
useful, consistent with clinicians’ impression (cost savings<br />
$1,895). CDI rates may be underestimated with ELISA assay and education<br />
is required to limit use of CDI associated antibiotics. HCW<br />
education via an antibiotic stewardship program would improve laboratory<br />
utilization and antibiotic use, help reduce nosocomial infections,<br />
and lead to cost savings.<br />
D103<br />
Nursing home improvement collaborative to reduce potentially<br />
avoidable hospital transfers.<br />
R. Tena-Nelson, 4 K. Santos, 4 L. Herndon, 5 E. Weingast, 2 S. Amrhein, 4<br />
K. S. Boockvar, 2,1 J. Ouslander. 3 1. JJP VA Medical Center, Bronx,<br />
NY; 2. Jewish Home Lifecare, New York, NY; 3. Florida Atlantic<br />
University, Boca Raton, FL; 4. Continuing Care Leadership<br />
Coalition, New York, NY; 5. Massachusetts Senior Care Foundation,<br />
Boston, MA.<br />
Supported By: New York State Departments of Health and Labor<br />
Background: Nursing home (NH) residents experience frequent<br />
hospital transfers, some avoidable. Interventions to Reduce Acute<br />
Care Transfers (INTERACT) provides tools and strategies to assist<br />
NH staff in early identification, communication, and documentation<br />
of changes in resident status.<br />
Objective: To implement INTERACT among members of Continuing<br />
Care Leadership Coalition (CCLC), a NY metropolitan area<br />
NH provider association, and evaluate educational and hospitalization<br />
impacts.<br />
Methods: Funding was obtained from a NY State health workforce<br />
training grant. Members of CCLC were invited to participate<br />
regardless of their baseline transfer rate. 13 education sessions (7 inperson)<br />
were conducted over 1 year. Sessions engaged NH executives,<br />
department heads, front-line nursing staff and their labor union,<br />
and staff from NHs’ partner hospitals. Topics included the INTER-<br />
ACT implementation process; use of simple standardized communication<br />
tools, advance care planning tools, care paths, and change in<br />
condition support tools; quality review of hospital transfers; exercises<br />
for refining clinical skills; teamwork; and lessons learned. One session<br />
used a high-fidelity patient case simulator.<br />
Results: There were 150 participants from 32 facilities. 94% of<br />
NHs were non-profit with 331 beds on average. After training 84%<br />
of participants responded that they were more confident in educating<br />
others about interventions to reduce preventable hospitalizations.<br />
Eighty percent indicated that their organization had a plan in<br />
place to coordinate INTERACT efforts in the next 3 months with a<br />
referring hospital. NHs reported high acceptance of, and compliance<br />
with, use of INTERACT tools. To date, two NHs reported 37% and<br />
18% reductions in hospital transfers as compared to the year prior to<br />
implementation.<br />
Conclusions: Use of a collaborative model among a group of<br />
urban nursing homes resulted in good acceptance and uptake of the<br />
INTERACT intervention. The program has the potential to impact<br />
NH resident care through standardized approaches to communication,<br />
early identification of clinical issues, decision-support, and support<br />
for stronger partnerships between acute and post-acute care<br />
providers.<br />
D104<br />
The PEACE Pilot Study: Convergence of <strong>Geriatrics</strong> and<br />
Palliative Care.<br />
K. R. Allen, 1,2 S. M. Radwany, 2,3 D. J. Kropp, 3,2 D. Ertle, 4<br />
S. Fosnight, 2,3 P. Moore, 2 S. E. Hazelett. 2 1. <strong>Geriatrics</strong> & LifeLong<br />
Health, Riverside Health System, Newport News, VA; 2. Summa<br />
Health System, Akron, OH; 3. DFCM, NEOMED, Rootstown, OH; 4.<br />
Area Agency on Aging 10B, Uniontown, OH.<br />
Supported By: National Palliative Care Research Center<br />
(NPCRC)and<br />
The Summa Foundation<br />
Background: Although geriatrics and palliative care are distinct<br />
disciplines, the populations they serve often overlap, especially for<br />
home-bound patients with chronic life-threatening illness.<br />
Purpose: To describe the feasibility of a randomized pilot study<br />
testing the effectiveness of a geriatrics/palliative care (PC) hybrid intervention<br />
to deliver early in-home interdisciplinary care management<br />
to improve the quality of PC in Ohio’s community-based longterm<br />
care Medicaid waiver program, PASSPORT.<br />
Methods: New PASSPORT enrollees were randomized to the<br />
intervention (n=40) or usual care (n=40). The intervention involves<br />
an in-home geriatrics/PC needs assessment by a trained PASSPORT<br />
case manager (CM). The CM presents the findings to an interdisciplinary<br />
team who devise an individualized care plan based on the consumer’s<br />
goals and best practice guidelines. The CM implements the<br />
plan with the consumer, family and primary care physician (PCP).<br />
The primary outcomes upon which we expected our intervention to<br />
have a positive effect include: 1) Symptom management, 2) Quality of<br />
life, 3) Mood, 4) Decision making/care planning, and 5) Spirituality.<br />
Results: No significant differences were found between groups<br />
regarding baseline demographics. At 6 months no differences were<br />
found in performance of ADLs or IADLs. Mean differences and 95%<br />
confidence intervals were calculated for each of the primary outcomes.<br />
All confidence intervals included zero indicating no significant<br />
S222<br />
AGS 2012 ANNUAL MEETING