Here - American Geriatrics Society
Here - American Geriatrics Society
Here - American Geriatrics Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
P OSTER<br />
A BSTRACTS<br />
Femur neck bone mineral density (FNBMD) is the cornerstone<br />
of hip fracture risk stratification in current clinical practice. Other<br />
risk stratification tools use FNBMD with other selected risk factors.<br />
It is unknown whether electronically derived available patient information<br />
is useful in predicting hip fracture. The goal of this study was<br />
to demonstrate the use of electronic medical records to create an<br />
index which is able to risk-stratify heterogeneous older population.<br />
METHODS<br />
This was a retrospective cohort study. All community-dwelling<br />
patients over 60 years in a primary care panel in Olmsted County,<br />
MN on January 1st, 2005 were enrolled (N=12,650).<br />
Subjects were randomly assigned to two groups, a development<br />
cohort (N=8,387) and a validation cohort (N=4,263).<br />
Using the development cohort’s electronic medical records<br />
(EMR), risk factors over the previous two years including demographic<br />
characteristics and comorbidities were evaluated for significance<br />
in univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The primary<br />
outcome was incident hip fracture in the subsequent four years. Risk<br />
factors were assigned a score based on their regression coefficient estimate<br />
and a total risk score was created. We used EMR of the validation<br />
cohort to evaluate the total risk score for sensitivity and specificity<br />
and create a receiver-operating curve.<br />
RESULTS<br />
288 (3.43%) subjects in the development cohort sustained a new<br />
hip fracture. The final model included age ≥75 (odds ratio (OR) 10,<br />
95% CI 4.4, 23), age 70-74 (OR 7.7, 95% CI 3.3, 18.1), age 65-70 (OR<br />
3.8, 95% CI 1.6, 9.4), white race (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2, 5.5), female gender<br />
(OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1, 1.9), prior hip fracture (OR 5.3, 95% CI 3.8,<br />
7.4), liver cirrhosis (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1, 7.6), malnutrition (OR 2.6,<br />
95% CI 1.6, 4.5), peripheral arterial disease (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2, 2.3),<br />
Parkinson’s disease (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2, 2.1), prior nursing home<br />
stay (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2, 2.3), and prior hospitalization (OR 1.4, 95%<br />
CI 1.1, 1.8). Area under receiver-operating curve (AUC) was 0.818,<br />
SE 0.017. Subjects with the highest 10% of the total risk score had<br />
(OR 9.1, 95% CI 6.5,12.6); thus a 9 fold increased risk for acquired<br />
hip fracture versus the rest of the cohort.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Electronically obtained, readily available patient information<br />
can be utilized for hip fracture risk stratification, without the need for<br />
further patient evaluation or FNBMD testing.<br />
B25<br />
Comparative impact of continence promotion interventions<br />
targeting older women reluctant to seek care for urinary<br />
incontinence.<br />
R. Agnew, 1,2 E. van den Heuvel, 2 C. Tannenbaum. 1 1. Université de<br />
Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; 2. Brunel University, Uxbridge,<br />
United Kingdom.<br />
Supported By: This work was funded by a partnership grant between<br />
the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the United<br />
Kingdom New Dynamics on Aging Program.<br />
Surveys suggest that only 13% to 50% of older women with urinary<br />
incontinence (UI) talk to a health care practitioner about their<br />
condition or implement evidence-based treatment. Continence<br />
awareness programs exist, but their effectiveness remains unknown.<br />
We sought to determine the comparative impact of a constructivist<br />
learning workshop on UI, an evidence-based self-management tool<br />
for UI, or both, compared to the effects of a sham workshop, on incontinent<br />
women’s perceived improvement in their UI condition.<br />
Methods: a 2x2 factorial open-label cluster randomized controlled<br />
trial testing is currently being conducted in the United Kingdom.<br />
The cluster (unit of randomization) is at the level of each local<br />
community senior’s group, from whence participants are recruited for<br />
the workshops. One of four interventions (3 experimental and 1 sham<br />
intervention) is randomly assigned to each community group, with<br />
randomization achieved by computer-generated random digits, balanced<br />
in block groups of four. Eligible participants are communitydwelling<br />
women 60 years of age or older, who have not sought medical<br />
advice for incontinence symptoms in the last 5 years, and who experience<br />
urinary incontinence with a frequency no less than twice<br />
weekly. One outcome for the trial is an improvement in UI at three<br />
months post-intervention, measured by a rating of improvement on<br />
the Patient’s Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire.<br />
Results: Five-hundred and twenty-four women attended the<br />
workshops and 200 (mean age 70 + 7 years) met eligibility criteria<br />
and were recruited to the trial. At 3-month follow-up, 47% of women<br />
in the combined group reported that their UI condition was very<br />
much or much better, compared to 35% of the constructivist workshop<br />
group alone, 28% of the self-management group, and 14% of<br />
the sham control group (p=0.013). Less than 5% of participants were<br />
lost to follow-up.<br />
Conclusion: Results of this interim analysis suggest that a continence<br />
promotion intervention combining constructivist learning theory<br />
debunking myths about UI being a normal part of aging and use<br />
of a self-management tool has the greatest impact on improvements<br />
in UI in older women with incontinence.<br />
B26<br />
The effects of life review writing on depressive symptoms: A<br />
randomized control trial.<br />
T. Chippendale. Occupational Therapy, Tufts University,<br />
Somerville, MA.<br />
Supported By: <strong>American</strong> Occupational Therapy Foundation<br />
Background:The purpose of this RCT was to evaluate the effectiveness<br />
of life review through writing with respect to decreasing depressive<br />
symptoms in older adults residing in senior residences. Life<br />
review is an important developmental task and therapeutic intervention.<br />
When executed through writing, the benefits may be multiplied.<br />
This study sought to provide support for this psychosocial intervention<br />
for older adults. Although meta-analysis reveals a number of<br />
studies that have examined the effectiveness of life review as an intervention<br />
for decreasing depressive symptoms (1), some have called for<br />
a refinement and validation of intervention protocols. The intervention<br />
used in this study, the “Share you Life Story” Workshop (2), includes<br />
the added therapeutic benefits of writing. Life review through<br />
writing, as opposed to life review through the oral method, has not<br />
been well studied (3) and may be a more beneficial approach (4).<br />
Methods: Participants: 45 older adults 65 years and older, who<br />
spoke English and who had a negative screen for probable dementia<br />
on the Mini-Cog.Setting:4 senior residences in NYC. Design: A randomized<br />
control trial with participants assigned to the treatment or<br />
wait list control group. Randomized was within each site using randomization<br />
with forced equal sample size. Data was analyzed using<br />
an RMANOVA and SPSS version 17 with a .05 significance level. The<br />
Geriatric Depression Scale was the primary outcome measure. Results:<br />
A statistically significant decrease in depressive symptoms was<br />
found for the treatment group as compared to the control group<br />
(N=45, p=.03, effect size d=.7). Conclusions: The results support the<br />
“Share your life story” writing workshop as an effective intervention<br />
for addressing depressive symptoms in older adults.<br />
(1)Bohlmeijer, E., Smit, F. & Cuijpers, P. (2003). Effects of life review<br />
on late life depression: A meta-analysis. International Journal of<br />
Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(12), 1088-1094.<br />
(2)Sierpina, M. (2002). Share your life story workshops. Galveston:<br />
University of Texas Medical Branch.<br />
(3)Richeson, N. & Thorson, J. A. (2002). The effect of autobiographical<br />
writing on the subjective well-being of older adults. North<br />
<strong>American</strong> Journal of Psychology, 4, 395-404.<br />
(4)Sherman, E. (1995). Differential effects of oral and written<br />
reminiscence in the elderly. In B. H. Haight, & Webster, J. D. (Eds.),<br />
The art and science of reminiscing (pp. 255-264). Washington: Taylor<br />
& Francis.<br />
AGS 2012 ANNUAL MEETING<br />
S81