08.11.2014 Views

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P OSTER<br />

A BSTRACTS<br />

Femur neck bone mineral density (FNBMD) is the cornerstone<br />

of hip fracture risk stratification in current clinical practice. Other<br />

risk stratification tools use FNBMD with other selected risk factors.<br />

It is unknown whether electronically derived available patient information<br />

is useful in predicting hip fracture. The goal of this study was<br />

to demonstrate the use of electronic medical records to create an<br />

index which is able to risk-stratify heterogeneous older population.<br />

METHODS<br />

This was a retrospective cohort study. All community-dwelling<br />

patients over 60 years in a primary care panel in Olmsted County,<br />

MN on January 1st, 2005 were enrolled (N=12,650).<br />

Subjects were randomly assigned to two groups, a development<br />

cohort (N=8,387) and a validation cohort (N=4,263).<br />

Using the development cohort’s electronic medical records<br />

(EMR), risk factors over the previous two years including demographic<br />

characteristics and comorbidities were evaluated for significance<br />

in univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The primary<br />

outcome was incident hip fracture in the subsequent four years. Risk<br />

factors were assigned a score based on their regression coefficient estimate<br />

and a total risk score was created. We used EMR of the validation<br />

cohort to evaluate the total risk score for sensitivity and specificity<br />

and create a receiver-operating curve.<br />

RESULTS<br />

288 (3.43%) subjects in the development cohort sustained a new<br />

hip fracture. The final model included age ≥75 (odds ratio (OR) 10,<br />

95% CI 4.4, 23), age 70-74 (OR 7.7, 95% CI 3.3, 18.1), age 65-70 (OR<br />

3.8, 95% CI 1.6, 9.4), white race (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2, 5.5), female gender<br />

(OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1, 1.9), prior hip fracture (OR 5.3, 95% CI 3.8,<br />

7.4), liver cirrhosis (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1, 7.6), malnutrition (OR 2.6,<br />

95% CI 1.6, 4.5), peripheral arterial disease (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2, 2.3),<br />

Parkinson’s disease (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2, 2.1), prior nursing home<br />

stay (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2, 2.3), and prior hospitalization (OR 1.4, 95%<br />

CI 1.1, 1.8). Area under receiver-operating curve (AUC) was 0.818,<br />

SE 0.017. Subjects with the highest 10% of the total risk score had<br />

(OR 9.1, 95% CI 6.5,12.6); thus a 9 fold increased risk for acquired<br />

hip fracture versus the rest of the cohort.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Electronically obtained, readily available patient information<br />

can be utilized for hip fracture risk stratification, without the need for<br />

further patient evaluation or FNBMD testing.<br />

B25<br />

Comparative impact of continence promotion interventions<br />

targeting older women reluctant to seek care for urinary<br />

incontinence.<br />

R. Agnew, 1,2 E. van den Heuvel, 2 C. Tannenbaum. 1 1. Université de<br />

Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; 2. Brunel University, Uxbridge,<br />

United Kingdom.<br />

Supported By: This work was funded by a partnership grant between<br />

the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the United<br />

Kingdom New Dynamics on Aging Program.<br />

Surveys suggest that only 13% to 50% of older women with urinary<br />

incontinence (UI) talk to a health care practitioner about their<br />

condition or implement evidence-based treatment. Continence<br />

awareness programs exist, but their effectiveness remains unknown.<br />

We sought to determine the comparative impact of a constructivist<br />

learning workshop on UI, an evidence-based self-management tool<br />

for UI, or both, compared to the effects of a sham workshop, on incontinent<br />

women’s perceived improvement in their UI condition.<br />

Methods: a 2x2 factorial open-label cluster randomized controlled<br />

trial testing is currently being conducted in the United Kingdom.<br />

The cluster (unit of randomization) is at the level of each local<br />

community senior’s group, from whence participants are recruited for<br />

the workshops. One of four interventions (3 experimental and 1 sham<br />

intervention) is randomly assigned to each community group, with<br />

randomization achieved by computer-generated random digits, balanced<br />

in block groups of four. Eligible participants are communitydwelling<br />

women 60 years of age or older, who have not sought medical<br />

advice for incontinence symptoms in the last 5 years, and who experience<br />

urinary incontinence with a frequency no less than twice<br />

weekly. One outcome for the trial is an improvement in UI at three<br />

months post-intervention, measured by a rating of improvement on<br />

the Patient’s Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire.<br />

Results: Five-hundred and twenty-four women attended the<br />

workshops and 200 (mean age 70 + 7 years) met eligibility criteria<br />

and were recruited to the trial. At 3-month follow-up, 47% of women<br />

in the combined group reported that their UI condition was very<br />

much or much better, compared to 35% of the constructivist workshop<br />

group alone, 28% of the self-management group, and 14% of<br />

the sham control group (p=0.013). Less than 5% of participants were<br />

lost to follow-up.<br />

Conclusion: Results of this interim analysis suggest that a continence<br />

promotion intervention combining constructivist learning theory<br />

debunking myths about UI being a normal part of aging and use<br />

of a self-management tool has the greatest impact on improvements<br />

in UI in older women with incontinence.<br />

B26<br />

The effects of life review writing on depressive symptoms: A<br />

randomized control trial.<br />

T. Chippendale. Occupational Therapy, Tufts University,<br />

Somerville, MA.<br />

Supported By: <strong>American</strong> Occupational Therapy Foundation<br />

Background:The purpose of this RCT was to evaluate the effectiveness<br />

of life review through writing with respect to decreasing depressive<br />

symptoms in older adults residing in senior residences. Life<br />

review is an important developmental task and therapeutic intervention.<br />

When executed through writing, the benefits may be multiplied.<br />

This study sought to provide support for this psychosocial intervention<br />

for older adults. Although meta-analysis reveals a number of<br />

studies that have examined the effectiveness of life review as an intervention<br />

for decreasing depressive symptoms (1), some have called for<br />

a refinement and validation of intervention protocols. The intervention<br />

used in this study, the “Share you Life Story” Workshop (2), includes<br />

the added therapeutic benefits of writing. Life review through<br />

writing, as opposed to life review through the oral method, has not<br />

been well studied (3) and may be a more beneficial approach (4).<br />

Methods: Participants: 45 older adults 65 years and older, who<br />

spoke English and who had a negative screen for probable dementia<br />

on the Mini-Cog.Setting:4 senior residences in NYC. Design: A randomized<br />

control trial with participants assigned to the treatment or<br />

wait list control group. Randomized was within each site using randomization<br />

with forced equal sample size. Data was analyzed using<br />

an RMANOVA and SPSS version 17 with a .05 significance level. The<br />

Geriatric Depression Scale was the primary outcome measure. Results:<br />

A statistically significant decrease in depressive symptoms was<br />

found for the treatment group as compared to the control group<br />

(N=45, p=.03, effect size d=.7). Conclusions: The results support the<br />

“Share your life story” writing workshop as an effective intervention<br />

for addressing depressive symptoms in older adults.<br />

(1)Bohlmeijer, E., Smit, F. & Cuijpers, P. (2003). Effects of life review<br />

on late life depression: A meta-analysis. International Journal of<br />

Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(12), 1088-1094.<br />

(2)Sierpina, M. (2002). Share your life story workshops. Galveston:<br />

University of Texas Medical Branch.<br />

(3)Richeson, N. & Thorson, J. A. (2002). The effect of autobiographical<br />

writing on the subjective well-being of older adults. North<br />

<strong>American</strong> Journal of Psychology, 4, 395-404.<br />

(4)Sherman, E. (1995). Differential effects of oral and written<br />

reminiscence in the elderly. In B. H. Haight, & Webster, J. D. (Eds.),<br />

The art and science of reminiscing (pp. 255-264). Washington: Taylor<br />

& Francis.<br />

AGS 2012 ANNUAL MEETING<br />

S81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!