08.11.2014 Views

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P OSTER<br />

A BSTRACTS<br />

D114<br />

Fall Reduction in an ACE Unit-A Model for Quality Improvement<br />

1,2 J.R Ortiz, 1,2T. Efeovbokham, 1 C.Stephens-Kelly, I,Rohner<br />

1,2Theodore Suh 1 UT Health Science Center in San Antonio &<br />

2CSRHCC.<br />

J. R. Ortiz, 1,2 T. Efeovbokham, 1,2 C. Stephens-Kelly, 1 I. Rohner, 2<br />

T. Suh . 1,2 1. <strong>Geriatrics</strong>, UTHSCSA, San Antonio Texas, TX; 2.<br />

<strong>Geriatrics</strong>, Cristus Santa Rosa, San Antonio, TX.<br />

PURPOSE: Identifying specific risk factors for those who fall in<br />

a hospital Acute Care of the Elderly (ACE) Unit can lead to a targeted<br />

intervention to prevent falls among hospitalized older adults.<br />

BACKGROUND: Falls are a common problem in hospitalized<br />

older adults, with about a third of hospital falls resulting in injuries<br />

such as fractures, head and soft tissue trauma, which contribute to increased<br />

length of stay (LOS), impaired rehabilitation, greater comorbidity,<br />

more transitions to long-term care and greater hospital costs.<br />

The main risk factors for falls in the hospital include gait instability,<br />

confusion, urinary incontinence, previous falls and certain drugs.<br />

METHODS: At the start of this study, our 10-bed ACE Unit at<br />

Christus Santa Rosa Hospital-City Centre had the highest fall rate in<br />

the hospital at just over 10 /1000 bed days. Our goal was to lower the<br />

fall rate to 3.4 /1000 bed days. The ACE team developed a multicomponent<br />

intervention, consisting of differentiating very high from high<br />

fall risk patients, hourly rounding and mandatory use of bed alarms<br />

for very high fall risk patients, and an incentive for ACE Unit nurses<br />

consisting of a free lunch at the end of a month without any falls.<br />

RESULTS: This intervention began on March 1/2011. For over 4<br />

consecutive months (March-June), there were no falls in our ACE<br />

Unit. We had one fall each in the months of July-Sept. and no falls in<br />

Oct. For the last quarter (July-Oct.), the fall rate for our ACE Unit<br />

was 3.5 /1000 bed days. The estimated cost to implement this change<br />

was $850, plus $100 monthly to maintain it. If a fall adds an average of<br />

4 days to the LOS, each prevented fall saves ~$12,800. If one conservatively<br />

estimates that 2 falls were prevented monthly with this intervention,<br />

then the annual projected cost savings is over $307,000.<br />

CONCLUSION: Specific strategies to reduce falls in hospitalized<br />

older adults have been successful. Differentiating those at highest<br />

risk for falls is essential. Increased nurse rounding and diligent<br />

bed alarm use for those at highest fall risk can reduce falls. A nominal<br />

reward to nursing staff for their efforts to reduce falls was also effective.<br />

There are potentially large cost savings to hospital from the prevention<br />

of falls and resulting injuries.<br />

D115<br />

CARE: A Volunteer Approach to Reducing Delirium in the<br />

Emergency Department.<br />

J. Arnold, M. Sanon, A. Chun. Department of <strong>Geriatrics</strong> and Palliative<br />

Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.<br />

Supported By: The Medical Student Training in Aging Research<br />

program of the the <strong>American</strong> Federation for Aging Research<br />

The emergency department is a critical point of care for the elderly<br />

and delirium is of particular concern in the chaotic ED environment.<br />

Patients who develop delirium in the ED have been shown to<br />

be at increased risk of adverse outcomes, have a more complicated<br />

clinical course, and a higher likelihood of being sedated to control agitation.<br />

The Care and Respect for Elders with Emergencies (CARE)<br />

program is an ongoing effort jointly developed by the Department of<br />

Geriatric and Palliative Medicine and Department of Emergency<br />

Medicine at The Mount Sinai Medical Center specifically designed to<br />

reduce the incidence of delirium in the ED. CARE adapts the successful<br />

approaches from inpatient volunteer programs to the ED environment.<br />

The goals of this retrospective cohort study were to understand<br />

which elderly ED patients were being visited by CARE<br />

volunteers and to characterize their clinical outcomes compared the<br />

the general elderly ED population for evidence that the volunteer<br />

program was having an impact on delirium. We looked at EMR data<br />

from 8009 visits to the ED by elderly patients over an 11 month period<br />

which included 104 volunteer visited patient visits. We found significant<br />

differences in the ethnic composition of the volunteer visited<br />

and non-visited populations with volunteers less likely to visit Hispanic<br />

patients. Volunteer visited patients had lower ESI scores at<br />

triage (were more urgently ill), had significantly longer ED lengths of<br />

stay, were significantly more likely to be admitted to the hospital and<br />

more likely to return to the ED within 30 days. Despite a seemingly<br />

more complicated clinical course, volunteer visited patients were less<br />

likely to be sedated during their ED visit. The results of this study<br />

agree with the expectation that volunteers are visiting more acutely<br />

ill patients but also raise questions about the selection bias that warrants<br />

further investigation. While the intentional and potentially unintentional<br />

volunteer assignment bias limits the value of comparing<br />

clinical course, the difference in sedation rate suggests that the<br />

CARE volunteer program may be reducing the incidence of delirium<br />

in the ED.<br />

D116<br />

Palliative Care Interventions in Advanced Chronic Diseases: A<br />

Systematic Review.<br />

J. E. Roberts, M. C. Reid, R. D. Adelman. Weill Cornell Medical<br />

College, New York, NY.<br />

PURPOSE: Palliative care’s (PC) potential to improve quality<br />

of life and provide symptom relief has received increased attention,<br />

but it remains unclear how commonly such interventions target diverse<br />

chronic illnesses. This study determines the occurrence and efficacy<br />

of PC interventions for chronic non-cancer and cancer disorders.<br />

METHODS: PubMed, MEDLine, CINAHL and Abstracts in<br />

Social Gerontology were searched (1/80-10/11) where terms included<br />

palliative care, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), end<br />

stage renal disease (ESRD), advanced heart disease (AHD) and cancer.<br />

Studies were limited to English-language papers reporting on<br />

multi-component PC interventions for adults with cancer, COPD,<br />

ESRD or AHD. Study quality was assessed.<br />

RESULTS: 1613 citations were identified. 41 met eligibility criteria<br />

and described 35 unique interventions. 21 targeted patients with<br />

cancer, and fewer targeted patients with AHD (n=4), ESRD (n=6), or<br />

multiple diseases (n=4). No study enrolled COPD patients exclusively,<br />

but multiple disease interventions included COPD patients.<br />

Five were RCTs and 30 were observational studies. Four of 30 observational<br />

studies and 4 of 5 RCTs were of high methodologic quality.<br />

Interventions were delivered in inpatient units (43%), outpatient<br />

clinics (51%), and home visits (46%), and by nurses (34%), physicians<br />

and nurses (17%), physicians (6%), or multidisciplinary teams<br />

(43%). The mean number of intervention components was 3.8 (range<br />

2-7), common components included symptom management (77%),<br />

advance care planning (49%), psychological support (49%), and care<br />

coordination (43%). Symptom burden was the most common outcome<br />

(46%), followed by medical care utilization (34%) and care satisfaction<br />

(31%). Fifteen studies reported improvements on all or<br />

most outcomes, 12 reported some improvements, and 1 showed no<br />

improvements. The most common symptom improvements were in<br />

pain (n=9) and nausea (n=7). Advance care planning increased as a<br />

result of interventions in 6 studies spanning all disease categories.<br />

CONCLUSIONS: Most PC interventions continue to target patients<br />

with cancer. While 77% report positive effects, methodologic<br />

quality was judged to be poor and only 14% employed an RCT design.<br />

Over half lacked data on the schedule and intensity of the intervention<br />

sufficient for replication. Research on multi-component PC<br />

interventions targeting chronic non-cancer illnesses and employing<br />

rigorous research methods is urgently needed.<br />

D117<br />

Home Based Transitional Care.<br />

J. Leland, J. Cariaga, D. Davis. James A Haley VA, Tampa, FL.<br />

June Leland MD, Jose Cariaga MD, Darlene Davis MHA<br />

S226<br />

AGS 2012 ANNUAL MEETING

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!