Here - American Geriatrics Society
Here - American Geriatrics Society
Here - American Geriatrics Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
P OSTER<br />
A BSTRACTS<br />
D114<br />
Fall Reduction in an ACE Unit-A Model for Quality Improvement<br />
1,2 J.R Ortiz, 1,2T. Efeovbokham, 1 C.Stephens-Kelly, I,Rohner<br />
1,2Theodore Suh 1 UT Health Science Center in San Antonio &<br />
2CSRHCC.<br />
J. R. Ortiz, 1,2 T. Efeovbokham, 1,2 C. Stephens-Kelly, 1 I. Rohner, 2<br />
T. Suh . 1,2 1. <strong>Geriatrics</strong>, UTHSCSA, San Antonio Texas, TX; 2.<br />
<strong>Geriatrics</strong>, Cristus Santa Rosa, San Antonio, TX.<br />
PURPOSE: Identifying specific risk factors for those who fall in<br />
a hospital Acute Care of the Elderly (ACE) Unit can lead to a targeted<br />
intervention to prevent falls among hospitalized older adults.<br />
BACKGROUND: Falls are a common problem in hospitalized<br />
older adults, with about a third of hospital falls resulting in injuries<br />
such as fractures, head and soft tissue trauma, which contribute to increased<br />
length of stay (LOS), impaired rehabilitation, greater comorbidity,<br />
more transitions to long-term care and greater hospital costs.<br />
The main risk factors for falls in the hospital include gait instability,<br />
confusion, urinary incontinence, previous falls and certain drugs.<br />
METHODS: At the start of this study, our 10-bed ACE Unit at<br />
Christus Santa Rosa Hospital-City Centre had the highest fall rate in<br />
the hospital at just over 10 /1000 bed days. Our goal was to lower the<br />
fall rate to 3.4 /1000 bed days. The ACE team developed a multicomponent<br />
intervention, consisting of differentiating very high from high<br />
fall risk patients, hourly rounding and mandatory use of bed alarms<br />
for very high fall risk patients, and an incentive for ACE Unit nurses<br />
consisting of a free lunch at the end of a month without any falls.<br />
RESULTS: This intervention began on March 1/2011. For over 4<br />
consecutive months (March-June), there were no falls in our ACE<br />
Unit. We had one fall each in the months of July-Sept. and no falls in<br />
Oct. For the last quarter (July-Oct.), the fall rate for our ACE Unit<br />
was 3.5 /1000 bed days. The estimated cost to implement this change<br />
was $850, plus $100 monthly to maintain it. If a fall adds an average of<br />
4 days to the LOS, each prevented fall saves ~$12,800. If one conservatively<br />
estimates that 2 falls were prevented monthly with this intervention,<br />
then the annual projected cost savings is over $307,000.<br />
CONCLUSION: Specific strategies to reduce falls in hospitalized<br />
older adults have been successful. Differentiating those at highest<br />
risk for falls is essential. Increased nurse rounding and diligent<br />
bed alarm use for those at highest fall risk can reduce falls. A nominal<br />
reward to nursing staff for their efforts to reduce falls was also effective.<br />
There are potentially large cost savings to hospital from the prevention<br />
of falls and resulting injuries.<br />
D115<br />
CARE: A Volunteer Approach to Reducing Delirium in the<br />
Emergency Department.<br />
J. Arnold, M. Sanon, A. Chun. Department of <strong>Geriatrics</strong> and Palliative<br />
Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.<br />
Supported By: The Medical Student Training in Aging Research<br />
program of the the <strong>American</strong> Federation for Aging Research<br />
The emergency department is a critical point of care for the elderly<br />
and delirium is of particular concern in the chaotic ED environment.<br />
Patients who develop delirium in the ED have been shown to<br />
be at increased risk of adverse outcomes, have a more complicated<br />
clinical course, and a higher likelihood of being sedated to control agitation.<br />
The Care and Respect for Elders with Emergencies (CARE)<br />
program is an ongoing effort jointly developed by the Department of<br />
Geriatric and Palliative Medicine and Department of Emergency<br />
Medicine at The Mount Sinai Medical Center specifically designed to<br />
reduce the incidence of delirium in the ED. CARE adapts the successful<br />
approaches from inpatient volunteer programs to the ED environment.<br />
The goals of this retrospective cohort study were to understand<br />
which elderly ED patients were being visited by CARE<br />
volunteers and to characterize their clinical outcomes compared the<br />
the general elderly ED population for evidence that the volunteer<br />
program was having an impact on delirium. We looked at EMR data<br />
from 8009 visits to the ED by elderly patients over an 11 month period<br />
which included 104 volunteer visited patient visits. We found significant<br />
differences in the ethnic composition of the volunteer visited<br />
and non-visited populations with volunteers less likely to visit Hispanic<br />
patients. Volunteer visited patients had lower ESI scores at<br />
triage (were more urgently ill), had significantly longer ED lengths of<br />
stay, were significantly more likely to be admitted to the hospital and<br />
more likely to return to the ED within 30 days. Despite a seemingly<br />
more complicated clinical course, volunteer visited patients were less<br />
likely to be sedated during their ED visit. The results of this study<br />
agree with the expectation that volunteers are visiting more acutely<br />
ill patients but also raise questions about the selection bias that warrants<br />
further investigation. While the intentional and potentially unintentional<br />
volunteer assignment bias limits the value of comparing<br />
clinical course, the difference in sedation rate suggests that the<br />
CARE volunteer program may be reducing the incidence of delirium<br />
in the ED.<br />
D116<br />
Palliative Care Interventions in Advanced Chronic Diseases: A<br />
Systematic Review.<br />
J. E. Roberts, M. C. Reid, R. D. Adelman. Weill Cornell Medical<br />
College, New York, NY.<br />
PURPOSE: Palliative care’s (PC) potential to improve quality<br />
of life and provide symptom relief has received increased attention,<br />
but it remains unclear how commonly such interventions target diverse<br />
chronic illnesses. This study determines the occurrence and efficacy<br />
of PC interventions for chronic non-cancer and cancer disorders.<br />
METHODS: PubMed, MEDLine, CINAHL and Abstracts in<br />
Social Gerontology were searched (1/80-10/11) where terms included<br />
palliative care, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), end<br />
stage renal disease (ESRD), advanced heart disease (AHD) and cancer.<br />
Studies were limited to English-language papers reporting on<br />
multi-component PC interventions for adults with cancer, COPD,<br />
ESRD or AHD. Study quality was assessed.<br />
RESULTS: 1613 citations were identified. 41 met eligibility criteria<br />
and described 35 unique interventions. 21 targeted patients with<br />
cancer, and fewer targeted patients with AHD (n=4), ESRD (n=6), or<br />
multiple diseases (n=4). No study enrolled COPD patients exclusively,<br />
but multiple disease interventions included COPD patients.<br />
Five were RCTs and 30 were observational studies. Four of 30 observational<br />
studies and 4 of 5 RCTs were of high methodologic quality.<br />
Interventions were delivered in inpatient units (43%), outpatient<br />
clinics (51%), and home visits (46%), and by nurses (34%), physicians<br />
and nurses (17%), physicians (6%), or multidisciplinary teams<br />
(43%). The mean number of intervention components was 3.8 (range<br />
2-7), common components included symptom management (77%),<br />
advance care planning (49%), psychological support (49%), and care<br />
coordination (43%). Symptom burden was the most common outcome<br />
(46%), followed by medical care utilization (34%) and care satisfaction<br />
(31%). Fifteen studies reported improvements on all or<br />
most outcomes, 12 reported some improvements, and 1 showed no<br />
improvements. The most common symptom improvements were in<br />
pain (n=9) and nausea (n=7). Advance care planning increased as a<br />
result of interventions in 6 studies spanning all disease categories.<br />
CONCLUSIONS: Most PC interventions continue to target patients<br />
with cancer. While 77% report positive effects, methodologic<br />
quality was judged to be poor and only 14% employed an RCT design.<br />
Over half lacked data on the schedule and intensity of the intervention<br />
sufficient for replication. Research on multi-component PC<br />
interventions targeting chronic non-cancer illnesses and employing<br />
rigorous research methods is urgently needed.<br />
D117<br />
Home Based Transitional Care.<br />
J. Leland, J. Cariaga, D. Davis. James A Haley VA, Tampa, FL.<br />
June Leland MD, Jose Cariaga MD, Darlene Davis MHA<br />
S226<br />
AGS 2012 ANNUAL MEETING