Here - American Geriatrics Society
Here - American Geriatrics Society
Here - American Geriatrics Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
P OSTER<br />
A BSTRACTS<br />
IgE antibodies in serum. Additional work is needed to test large numbers<br />
of samples for clinical application.<br />
B136<br />
Does this Patient have Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy with Bladder<br />
Outlet Obstruction?<br />
K. A. D’Silva , 1 P. Dahm, 2 C. L. Wong. 1 1. Geriatric Medicine,<br />
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 2. Urology, University of<br />
Florida, Gainesville, FL.<br />
Background: Although benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is<br />
very common in older men, not all men with histologic BPH will develop<br />
the non-specific symptoms known as lower urinary tract symptoms<br />
(LUTS). Likewise, not all men with LUTS have histologic BPH.<br />
Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) refers to the pressure gradient at<br />
the bladder neck/prostatic urethra which can be measured by invasive<br />
urodynamics. Accurate diagnosis of BOO is important because it<br />
can cause not only immediate symptoms including severe pain and<br />
urinary retention but also lead to complications, e.g.incontinence and<br />
renal insufficiency.<br />
Objective: To systematically review the evidence on the diagnostic<br />
accuracy of office-based tests for BPH with BOO in males<br />
with LUTS.<br />
Methods: Search of MEDLINE and EMBASE (from 1950 to<br />
August 12, 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via<br />
Ovid, and references of retrieved articles, to identify diagnostic studies<br />
of patients with LUTS due to BPH with BOO.<br />
Data selection: Prospective studies comparing at least one diagnostic<br />
test, feasible in a clinical setting and readily available to a nonspecialist<br />
clinician, to the gold standard reference test, invasive urodynamic<br />
studies. Studies were excluded if they used pediatric patients<br />
or if participants had confounding medical conditions.<br />
There were 6692 unique citations identified with 9 prospectively<br />
conducted studies (N=1217 patients) meeting inclusion criteria and<br />
describing use of 2 symptom questionnaires as well as individual<br />
symptom(s). All tests were administered and scored based on international<br />
guidelines. The best constellation of symptoms that suggested<br />
BPH with BOO was ‘poor stream and frequency and/or nocturia’<br />
(positive LR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.17- 2.64). The most useful<br />
symptom in which the absence made a diagnosis of BPH with BOO<br />
less likely, was nocturia (negative LR, 0.19, 95% CI, CI 0.05-0.79). The<br />
best symptom questionnaire to support or rule out a diagnosis of<br />
BPH with BOO was the International Prostatic Symptom Score (I-<br />
PSS) at a cut-off of 8 (summary positive LR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.70;<br />
summary negative LR, 0.28, 95% CI, CI 0.12-0.70).<br />
Conclusions: Although urodynamic investigations are the gold<br />
standard for diagnosis of BPH with BOO, symptoms obtained<br />
through history may be useful for diagnosis. The best evidence supports<br />
asking the patient about nocuturia, stream and frequency.<br />
B137<br />
Predicting Mortality Following Clostridium difficile Infection.<br />
L. Archbald-Pannone, 1,2 R. Pinkerton, 1,3 R. Guerrant. 1,3 1. Internal<br />
Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; 2. Division of<br />
General Medicine, <strong>Geriatrics</strong>, and Palliative Care, University of<br />
Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; 3. Division of Infectious Diseases and<br />
International Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.<br />
Supported By: NIH/ NIAID 5K23AI074681-04<br />
Background: With increasing incidence & severity of Clostridium<br />
difficile (C. difficile) infection (CDI), there are no objective factors<br />
at diagnosis that have been proven to predict poor outcome. We<br />
evaluated demographics, co-morbidities, medications, & laboratory<br />
tests in a cohort of hospitalized patients to determine factors that<br />
could predict death following CDI diagnosis. Methods: After obtaining<br />
consent, adult inpatients with CDI diagnosed in our hospital<br />
(September 2008-May 2010, UVA HSR-IRB 13630) were followed 12<br />
months after C. difficile diagnosis to determine short-term mortality<br />
(STM, 1 month) & long-term (LTM, 12 months). Age & Charlson comorbidities<br />
score were calculated on day of CDI diagnosis. White<br />
blood cell count (WBC) & renal function (BUN, GFR, & Creatinine)<br />
were recorded on day of diagnosis; serum albumin recorded within 7<br />
days of diagnosis (mean, if multiple); & medications prior to diagnosis<br />
were recorded. Binary logistic regression (SPSS 19) determined a<br />
model to best predict mortality, using univariate predictors of mortality<br />
(student’s t-tests, chi-squared) & backward regression to eliminate<br />
non-significant factors. Significance set p ≤ 0.05. Results: 85 subjects;<br />
age 63.4 years (sd 16.9); Charlson score 5.8 (sd 4.0); time to death 2.4<br />
months (sd 3.6); STM rate 32.9% (n=28); LTM rate 52.9% (n=45).<br />
Factors associated with STM & LTM, respectively: age (both<br />
p