08.11.2014 Views

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P OSTER<br />

A BSTRACTS<br />

IgE antibodies in serum. Additional work is needed to test large numbers<br />

of samples for clinical application.<br />

B136<br />

Does this Patient have Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy with Bladder<br />

Outlet Obstruction?<br />

K. A. D’Silva , 1 P. Dahm, 2 C. L. Wong. 1 1. Geriatric Medicine,<br />

University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 2. Urology, University of<br />

Florida, Gainesville, FL.<br />

Background: Although benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is<br />

very common in older men, not all men with histologic BPH will develop<br />

the non-specific symptoms known as lower urinary tract symptoms<br />

(LUTS). Likewise, not all men with LUTS have histologic BPH.<br />

Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) refers to the pressure gradient at<br />

the bladder neck/prostatic urethra which can be measured by invasive<br />

urodynamics. Accurate diagnosis of BOO is important because it<br />

can cause not only immediate symptoms including severe pain and<br />

urinary retention but also lead to complications, e.g.incontinence and<br />

renal insufficiency.<br />

Objective: To systematically review the evidence on the diagnostic<br />

accuracy of office-based tests for BPH with BOO in males<br />

with LUTS.<br />

Methods: Search of MEDLINE and EMBASE (from 1950 to<br />

August 12, 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via<br />

Ovid, and references of retrieved articles, to identify diagnostic studies<br />

of patients with LUTS due to BPH with BOO.<br />

Data selection: Prospective studies comparing at least one diagnostic<br />

test, feasible in a clinical setting and readily available to a nonspecialist<br />

clinician, to the gold standard reference test, invasive urodynamic<br />

studies. Studies were excluded if they used pediatric patients<br />

or if participants had confounding medical conditions.<br />

There were 6692 unique citations identified with 9 prospectively<br />

conducted studies (N=1217 patients) meeting inclusion criteria and<br />

describing use of 2 symptom questionnaires as well as individual<br />

symptom(s). All tests were administered and scored based on international<br />

guidelines. The best constellation of symptoms that suggested<br />

BPH with BOO was ‘poor stream and frequency and/or nocturia’<br />

(positive LR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.17- 2.64). The most useful<br />

symptom in which the absence made a diagnosis of BPH with BOO<br />

less likely, was nocturia (negative LR, 0.19, 95% CI, CI 0.05-0.79). The<br />

best symptom questionnaire to support or rule out a diagnosis of<br />

BPH with BOO was the International Prostatic Symptom Score (I-<br />

PSS) at a cut-off of 8 (summary positive LR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.70;<br />

summary negative LR, 0.28, 95% CI, CI 0.12-0.70).<br />

Conclusions: Although urodynamic investigations are the gold<br />

standard for diagnosis of BPH with BOO, symptoms obtained<br />

through history may be useful for diagnosis. The best evidence supports<br />

asking the patient about nocuturia, stream and frequency.<br />

B137<br />

Predicting Mortality Following Clostridium difficile Infection.<br />

L. Archbald-Pannone, 1,2 R. Pinkerton, 1,3 R. Guerrant. 1,3 1. Internal<br />

Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; 2. Division of<br />

General Medicine, <strong>Geriatrics</strong>, and Palliative Care, University of<br />

Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; 3. Division of Infectious Diseases and<br />

International Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.<br />

Supported By: NIH/ NIAID 5K23AI074681-04<br />

Background: With increasing incidence & severity of Clostridium<br />

difficile (C. difficile) infection (CDI), there are no objective factors<br />

at diagnosis that have been proven to predict poor outcome. We<br />

evaluated demographics, co-morbidities, medications, & laboratory<br />

tests in a cohort of hospitalized patients to determine factors that<br />

could predict death following CDI diagnosis. Methods: After obtaining<br />

consent, adult inpatients with CDI diagnosed in our hospital<br />

(September 2008-May 2010, UVA HSR-IRB 13630) were followed 12<br />

months after C. difficile diagnosis to determine short-term mortality<br />

(STM, 1 month) & long-term (LTM, 12 months). Age & Charlson comorbidities<br />

score were calculated on day of CDI diagnosis. White<br />

blood cell count (WBC) & renal function (BUN, GFR, & Creatinine)<br />

were recorded on day of diagnosis; serum albumin recorded within 7<br />

days of diagnosis (mean, if multiple); & medications prior to diagnosis<br />

were recorded. Binary logistic regression (SPSS 19) determined a<br />

model to best predict mortality, using univariate predictors of mortality<br />

(student’s t-tests, chi-squared) & backward regression to eliminate<br />

non-significant factors. Significance set p ≤ 0.05. Results: 85 subjects;<br />

age 63.4 years (sd 16.9); Charlson score 5.8 (sd 4.0); time to death 2.4<br />

months (sd 3.6); STM rate 32.9% (n=28); LTM rate 52.9% (n=45).<br />

Factors associated with STM & LTM, respectively: age (both<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!