08.11.2014 Views

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

Here - American Geriatrics Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P OSTER<br />

A BSTRACTS<br />

Methods: Two hundred and four volunteers at McLaren Regional<br />

Medical Center in Flint, Michigan, in May 2011, were<br />

mailed an anonymous survey. The RAND 36–Item Health Survey<br />

(Version 1.0) was used as the instrument for quality of life measurement.<br />

The demographic questions included: gender, age, marital<br />

status, ethnicity, completed level of education and house–hold<br />

income. The responses were collected for eight weeks. We analyzed<br />

demographic variables and compared them between our<br />

mean and those of the general elderly volunteering population,<br />

obtained from the literature. Analysis of quality of life data is<br />

pending.<br />

Results: One hundred and three participants returned completed<br />

surveys, resulting in a 45% response rate. 91% were female,<br />

ages 65 to 94, with the majority (38%) in the 75-84 range. 91% were<br />

Caucasian; 55% were single, as opposed to residing with someone or<br />

married. Majority had either completed the 12th grade (38%) or<br />

some college (35%). 28% had an annual income range in the<br />

$20–34,000, though a significant proportion chose not to provide this<br />

information.<br />

Conclusion: National data tends to group older volunteering<br />

adults into one large category of 65 years and older, however, we<br />

were able to break this group down and revealed the demographic<br />

variables. Additionally, as opposed to the current research which suggests<br />

that those with higher educational and income levels make up<br />

the general volunteering population, our research indicates that it is<br />

those which fall in the middle range on both items who choose to participate<br />

in volunteering activity.<br />

C161<br />

The Relationship Between Body Weight and Quality of Life in<br />

Older Adults with Medicare Supplement Insurance.<br />

K. Hawkins, 1 F. G. Bottone Jr, 1 S. Musich, 1 R. J. Ozminkowski, 1,2<br />

Y. Cheng, 1 R. J. Migliori, 2 C. S. Yeh. 3 1. Advanced Analytics,<br />

OptumInsight, Ann Arbor, MI; 2. UnitedHealth Group Alliances,<br />

Minnetonka, MN; 3. AARP Services, Inc., Washington, DC.<br />

Supported By: UnitedHealth Group and AARP Services, Inc. (ASI).<br />

The objective of this study was to estimate the relative impact<br />

that each body mass index (BMI) category has on health-related<br />

quality of life. A mail survey was sent to 60,000 adults with an<br />

AARP®-branded Medicare Supplement Insurance (i.e. Medigap)<br />

plan provided by UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company (for New<br />

York residents, UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company of New York)<br />

in 10 states. The Medicare Health Outcomes Survey instrument was<br />

used, but renamed the Health Update Survey, for use with a Medigap<br />

sample. Casemix-adjusted comparisons were made between each<br />

BMI category versus those with normal BMI.A total of 22,827 (38%)<br />

eligible sample members responded to the survey. Respondents had<br />

the following BMI categories: 2.2% were underweight, 37.0% were<br />

overweight, 18.5% were obese, 1.9% were morbidly obese, 38.5% had<br />

a normal BMI and 1.9% were missing BMI information. Factors associated<br />

with being underweight or carrying excess body weight were<br />

generally consistent with past reports. Quality of life was assessed<br />

using the average physical component scores (PCS) and mental component<br />

scores (MCS) obtained from the VR-12 health status tool. Respondents’<br />

PCS values were 5.01, 0.16, 3.60 and 9.50 points lower on<br />

average, respectively, for the underweight, overweight, obese and<br />

morbidly obese BMI categories, compared to the normal BMI group.<br />

Respondents’ MCS values were 3.28, +0.52, 0.32 and 1.39 points<br />

lower on average, respectively for the underweight, overweight,<br />

obese and morbidly obese BMI categories, compared to the normal<br />

weight group. The greatest impact on quality of life was on those in<br />

the underweight and morbidly obese categories, with the greater negative<br />

impacts were on the physical rather than mental aspects of quality<br />

of life.<br />

C162<br />

The Responsiveness of Quality of Life Measures in Patients with<br />

Alzheimer’s Disease: Results from the Canadian Alzheimer’s<br />

Disease Quality of Life Study.<br />

G. Naglie, 1,2 D. Hogan, 5 M. Krahn, 3,4 S. Black, 4 M. Freedman, 4<br />

L. Beattie, 6 M. Borrie, 7 A. Byszewski, 8 C. MacKnight, 9 C. Patterson, 10<br />

H. Bergman, 11 J. Irvine, 12 P. Ritvo, 12 D. Streiner, 10 J. Comrie, 12<br />

M. Kowgier, 4 G. Tomlinson. 3,4 1. Baycrest, Toronto, ON, Canada; 2.<br />

Toronto Rehab, Toronto, ON, Canada; 3. Toronto General Research<br />

Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; 4. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON,<br />

Canada; 5. University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; 6. University<br />

of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 7. University of Western<br />

Ontario, London, ON, Canada; 8. University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON,<br />

Canada; 9. Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada; 10. McMaster<br />

University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; 11. McGill University, Montreal,<br />

QC, Canada; 12. York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.<br />

Supported By: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Alzheimer<br />

<strong>Society</strong> of Canada and the University Health Network Geriatric Fund.<br />

Purpose: To assess the responsiveness of a variety of generic and<br />

disease-specific quality of life (QOL) measures in patients with<br />

Alzheimer’s disease (AD).<br />

Methods: We recruited 272 community-living AD patients and<br />

their caregivers from clinics across Canada. Patients with MMSE<br />

scores > 10 rated their QOL using the EQ-5D, Quality of Well-Being<br />

scale, a visual analogue scale and the QOL in AD (QOL-AD) instrument.<br />

Caregivers rated patient’s QOL using these measures as well as<br />

the Health Utilities Index (HUI) and Short-Form-36. QOL and patients’<br />

cognition (AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive), function (Disability<br />

Assessment for Dementia) and neuropsychiatric symptoms<br />

(Neuropsychiatric Inventory and Geriatric Depression Scale) were<br />

assessed at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. We evaluated internal responsiveness<br />

using the standardized effect size and the standardized<br />

response mean. We assessed external responsiveness using receiver<br />

operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the QOL measures based<br />

on a decline or no decline in a composite score based on the first principal<br />

component of the core dementia symptoms.<br />

Results: At baseline, patients’ mean age was 82.8, 50.2% were<br />

female and mean MMSE was 20.2. For patient self-ratings, the QOL<br />

measures did not exhibit meaningful responsiveness over time. For<br />

caregiver ratings of patient QOL: the internal responsiveness of the<br />

QOL measures at 12 and 24 months was small (0.12 to 0.28) and small<br />

to moderate (0.22 to 0.59), respectively; the external responsiveness<br />

at 12 and 24 months was greatest for the EQ-5D, QOL-AD and HUI,<br />

with areas under the ROC curves of 0.67 to 0.77.<br />

Conclusions: Over 24 months of follow-up, patient self-ratings of<br />

QOL did not exhibit meaningful responsiveness, while caregiver ratings<br />

of patient QOL with the QOL-AD, HUI and EQ-5D exhibited<br />

moderate responsiveness.<br />

C163<br />

Physical Therapy Interventions Utilizing Dual Task Phenomenon to<br />

Decrease Cognitive-motor Interference in a Person Status-post<br />

Intercerebral Hemorrhage: a Case Report.<br />

A. Tilsley, G. L. Raymond. Physical Therapy, Samuel Merritt<br />

University, Oakland, CA.<br />

BACKGROUND: Cognitive-motor interference (CMI) is a<br />

phenomenon in which the simultaneous performance of a motor and<br />

cognitive task interferes with the performance of one or both tasks.<br />

CMI can occur after a stroke, increasing a person’s risk of falls as they<br />

may be unable to react to unexpected challenges during ambulation.<br />

The objective of this case report is to demonstrate how the theory of<br />

CMI was used to develop interventions aimed at decreasing a patient’s<br />

fall risk.<br />

DESIGN: Case report.<br />

SETTING: Acute rehabilitation in Northern California.<br />

S186<br />

AGS 2012 ANNUAL MEETING

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!