Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes
Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes
Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Case 2. Suppose that ∆ belongs to the set ∆ 2,ltv (γ) and assume that G 11,ϑ = 0 (i.e., ∆ does<br />
not experience feedback). Then, applying Theorem 5.9 yields the following optimization:<br />
ˆµ ⋆ = maximize<br />
β<br />
subject to<br />
‖W 1/2 ˆR‖ ∞<br />
ˆR i = r unc<br />
k f +i−1 , i = 1,..., N − k f + 1,<br />
r unc = F 2 G 21,ϑ β + F 2 G 23,ϑ f (ϑ) + (F 2 G 24,ϑ + F 1 )u<br />
α = G 13,ϑ f (ϑ) +G 14,ϑ u<br />
‖τ l β‖ 2 ≤ γ‖τ l α‖ 2 ,<br />
l = 0,1,...,k.<br />
As in Case 1, the objective is a weighted pointwise maximum <strong>of</strong> affine functions <strong>of</strong> β, which<br />
implies that it is convex. Since the signal α is fixed, each <strong>of</strong> the k + 1 inequality constraints<br />
is quadratic in β and the optimization problem is a socp.<br />
99