08.11.2014 Views

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the performance metrics, a comprehensive performance analysis would consider all<br />

possible values <strong>of</strong> u, which is clearly not feasible. One reasonable compromise is to<br />

compute the worst-case performance over a specified family <strong>of</strong> inputs. To this end,<br />

we consider families <strong>of</strong> inputs that have the following form:<br />

B n u<br />

p (u ◦ ,γ) = { u + u ◦ ∈ S n u<br />

: ‖u‖ p < γ } ,<br />

where u ◦ ∈ l n u<br />

p is a fixed nominal input, p ∈ [1,∞] specifies the l p -norm, and γ > 0 is<br />

the desired bound.<br />

2. Bounded Disturbances: Thus far, we have assumed that the system G θ is affected by<br />

a noise signal v. It is also useful to consider the case where a deterministic signal w,<br />

called a disturbance, affects the system in such a way that the fault diagnosis scheme<br />

cannot use w to generate a residual. We consider disturbances in the bounded set<br />

B n w<br />

p (0,γ) = { w ∈ S n w<br />

: ‖w‖ p < γ } ,<br />

where p ∈ [1,∞] specifies the l p -norm, and γ > 0 is the desired bound.<br />

3. Uncertain <strong>Fault</strong> Signals: In Chapters 3 and 4, it is assumed that the fault signal f k<br />

at time k is a known, fixed function <strong>of</strong> the fault parameter sequence θ 0:k . While this<br />

approach may work for certain types <strong>of</strong> faults, it <strong>of</strong>ten useful to consider the worst-case<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> a fault diagnosis scheme over a set <strong>of</strong> possible fault signals. Hence, for<br />

a given parameter sequence ϑ, we assume the fault signal lies in a bounded set <strong>of</strong> the<br />

form<br />

B n f<br />

p<br />

(<br />

f (ϑ) ◦ ,γ ) = { f + f ◦ (ϑ) ∈ S n f<br />

: ‖f ‖ p < γ } ,<br />

where f ◦ (ϑ) ∈ l n f<br />

p is the nominal value <strong>of</strong> the fault signal, p ∈ [1,∞] specifies the<br />

l p -norm, and γ > 0 is the desired bound.<br />

4. Model Uncertainty: In model-based fault diagnosis schemes, the residual generator<br />

is usually designed according to the nominal system model G 0 . However, it useful to<br />

consider cases where G 0 does not perfectly model the system or the designer <strong>of</strong> the<br />

residual generator does not have accurate knowledge <strong>of</strong> the true model. Both <strong>of</strong> these<br />

cases are addressed by assuming that the parameterized system G θ is uncertain. In<br />

particular, we assume that the system consists <strong>of</strong> an interconnection <strong>of</strong> the system G θ<br />

and an uncertain operator ∆. We consider two classes <strong>of</strong> uncertain operators. First,<br />

we consider the class norm-bounded linear time-invariant uncertainties<br />

∆ 2,lti (γ) := { ∆ ∈ ∆ 2 (γ) : ∆ is lti, causal, stable } ,<br />

where γ > 0 is the desired bound. Second, we consider the class <strong>of</strong> norm-bounded<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!