08.11.2014 Views

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

s 2<br />

. ..<br />

s 0<br />

s 1<br />

s q<br />

Figure 4.4. State-transition diagram for a system that reconfigures when a fault occurs. The state s 0<br />

represents the nominal configuration, while state s i , i ≠ 0, represents the configuration that is used<br />

when d k = i . Since the fault diagnosis problem essentially restarts when a reconfiguration occurs, only<br />

one level <strong>of</strong> reconfiguration is shown.<br />

Systems that Reconfigure when a <strong>Fault</strong> is Detected<br />

Thus far, we have considered fault diagnosis problems in which the decision sequence {d k }<br />

may be nonzero at one instant and then return to zero at the next. Sometimes, however,<br />

it is useful to consider the case where some action is taken once {d k } is no longer zero. In<br />

particular, we consider the case where the system is reconfigured when d k ≠ 0. For example,<br />

if d k = i indicates that component i has failed at or before time k, then the system G θ<br />

should be reconfigured to no longer use that component. Similarly, the fault diagnosis<br />

scheme V = (F,δ) must also be reconfigured. Once the system G θ and scheme V have been<br />

reconfigured, a new fault diagnosis problem begins. In this section, we demonstrate that<br />

such reconfigurations can be modeled by a dynamic decision function, so that the property<br />

<strong>of</strong> being in a given configuration can be computed efficiently using our performance analysis<br />

framework.<br />

Suppose that V = (F,δ) is a fault diagnosis scheme designed for the plant G θ in its<br />

nominal configuration, such that d k = δ(k,r k ) takes values in the set D = {0,1,..., q}. Let s 0<br />

denote the original configuration <strong>of</strong> G θ and V . Similarly, for i = 1,..., q, let s i denote the<br />

reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> the system and scheme that takes place when d k = i . Assume that, after<br />

reconfiguration, there is no returning to the original configuration s 0 . Hence, the set <strong>of</strong><br />

possible reconfigurations is governed by the state-transition diagram shown in Figure 4.4.<br />

Let the sequence {z k } represent the configuration at each time step, and let { d ˆ k } be a<br />

new sequence <strong>of</strong> decisions that is given by the recurrence<br />

⎧<br />

⎨δ(k,r k ) if z k−1 = 0,<br />

z k =<br />

⎩ otherwise,<br />

ˆ d k = z k ,<br />

z k−1<br />

where z −1 = 0. This recurrence defines a dynamic decision function that decides which configuration<br />

is in use at each point in time. Note that the state space <strong>of</strong> {z k } is Z = {0,1,..., q}.<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!