08.11.2014 Views

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

malfunction — an intermittent irregularity in the fulfilment <strong>of</strong> a system’s desired<br />

function.<br />

disturbance — an unknown (and uncontrolled) input acting on a system.<br />

residual — a fault indicator, based on a deviation between measurements and<br />

model-equation-based computations.<br />

fault detection — determination <strong>of</strong> the faults present in a system and the time<br />

<strong>of</strong> detection.<br />

fault isolation — determination <strong>of</strong> the kind, location and time <strong>of</strong> detection <strong>of</strong> a<br />

fault. Follows fault detection.<br />

fault identification — determination <strong>of</strong> the size and time-variant behaviour <strong>of</strong> a<br />

fault. Follows fault isolation.<br />

fault diagnosis — determination <strong>of</strong> the kind, size, location and time <strong>of</strong> detection<br />

<strong>of</strong> a fault. Follows fault detection. Includes fault identification.<br />

reliability — ability <strong>of</strong> a system to perform a required function under stated<br />

conditions, within a given scope, during a given period <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

safety — ability <strong>of</strong> a system not to cause danger to persons or equipment or the<br />

environment.<br />

availability — probability that a system or equipment will operate satisfactorily<br />

and effectively at any point <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

2.4.2 Brief Survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fault</strong> <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

In this section, we present a brief survey <strong>of</strong> the vast field <strong>of</strong> fault diagnosis. For a thorough<br />

treatment, see Chen and Patton [9], Ding [24], or Isermann [48]. Consider the general fault<br />

diagnosis problem in Figure 2.2. The system G is affected by known inputs u, stochastic<br />

noises v, unknown deterministic disturbances w, and an exogenous signal f representing<br />

a fault. The fault diagnosis scheme is comprised <strong>of</strong> two parts: a residual generator F and<br />

a decision function δ. The residual generator F uses the known input u and the measured<br />

output y to produce a residual r , which carries information about the occurrence <strong>of</strong> faults.<br />

The decision function δ evaluates the residual and determines what type <strong>of</strong> fault, if any, has<br />

occurred. The output <strong>of</strong> the residual generator, d, is called the decision issued by the fdi<br />

scheme. Typically, d takes values in some finite set <strong>of</strong> decisions D. This separation <strong>of</strong> a fault<br />

diagnosis scheme into two stages was first proposed in [13].<br />

There are a number <strong>of</strong> approaches to constructing meaningful residual signals. In a<br />

structured residual set, the residual r is a vector such that each component r i is sensitive to<br />

a subset <strong>of</strong> faults. If each residual component r i is sensitive to a single component f i <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fault vector, then r is said to be a dedicated residual set. Another approach is to make each<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!