08.11.2014 Views

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.3.3 Aggregate Measures <strong>of</strong> <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Although the performance metrics {P tn,k }, {P fp,k }, {P fn,k }, and {P tp,k } fully characterize the<br />

time-varying behavior <strong>of</strong> the fault detection scheme V = (F,δ), it is <strong>of</strong>ten useful to aggregate<br />

these probabilities into a single meaningful quality. In this section, we consider two common<br />

aggregate performance measures. These approaches are included to further elucidate<br />

the connection between statistical hypothesis testing and performance analysis for fault<br />

detection schemes.<br />

Probability <strong>of</strong> Correctness<br />

The probability <strong>of</strong> correctness <strong>of</strong> a test V , denoted c k , is defined as the probability that the<br />

decision d k corresponds to the correct hypothesis. More precisely, for each time k,<br />

c k := P tn,k + P tp,k = (1 − P f,k )Q 0,k + P d,k Q 1,k .<br />

Equivalently, one may consider the probability e k := 1−c k , which is known as the probability<br />

<strong>of</strong> error [61].<br />

Bayesian Risk<br />

To generalize the concept <strong>of</strong> accuracy, we utilize the concepts <strong>of</strong> loss and risk used in<br />

hypothesis testing [60] and general statistical decision theory [4, 22]. Fix a time k. In general,<br />

a loss function L k : Θ × D → R is a nonnegative bounded function that quantifies the loss<br />

L k (ϑ k ,d k ) incurred by deciding d k when ϑ k is the true state <strong>of</strong> affairs. Since the parameter<br />

space is partitioned as Θ = Θ 0 ∪ Θ 1 and the set <strong>of</strong> decisions is D = {0,1}, a loss function for<br />

the fault detection problem can be expressed as a matrix L k ∈ R 2×2 with nonnegative entries.<br />

The value L k (i , j ) can be interpreted as the loss incurred by deciding d k = j “averaged” over<br />

all ϑ k ∈ Θ i .<br />

The loss matrices {L k } k≥0 provide a subjective way to quantify the importance <strong>of</strong> making<br />

the correct decision in each possible case. The Bayesian risk R k (Q,V ) is defined to be the<br />

expected loss incurred by the test V at time k, given that the parameter {θ k } is distributed<br />

according to Q k = {Q 0,k ,Q 1,k }. More precisely, for each time k,<br />

( )<br />

R k (Q,V ) := E L(θ k ,d k )<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> the performance metrics, the risk is<br />

=<br />

1∑<br />

i=0 j =0<br />

1∑<br />

L k (i , j )P(D j,k ∩ H i ,k ).<br />

R k (Q,V ) = L(0,0)P tn + L(1,0)P fn + L(0,1)P fp + L(1,1)P tp<br />

(<br />

) (<br />

)<br />

= L(0,0)Q 0 + L(1,0)Q 1 + L(0,1) − L(0,0) P f Q 0 + L(1,1) − L(1,0) P d Q 1 ,<br />

(3.13)<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!