08.11.2014 Views

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

Probabilistic Performance Analysis of Fault Diagnosis Schemes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

z max<br />

(a)<br />

Up−Down Counter State, z<br />

τ<br />

0<br />

(b)<br />

Residual, r<br />

ε<br />

0<br />

−ε<br />

0 k 1<br />

k 2<br />

Time Step, k<br />

Figure 4.3. Comparison <strong>of</strong> the behavior <strong>of</strong> an up-down counter (a) and the behavior <strong>of</strong> the underlying<br />

threshold decision function (b). The horizontal blue lines indicated the threshold regions, and the<br />

vertical shaded bands indicate the ranges <strong>of</strong> time where the respective decision function signals that a<br />

fault has occurred. The actual fault starts at time k 1 and stops at time k 2 .<br />

to the point where the number <strong>of</strong> false alarms is reasonable, the delay <strong>of</strong> the original threshold<br />

decision function would be even greater. Therefore, in this case, the up-down counter<br />

actually responds more quickly.<br />

Note that for α > 0, the parameters (C d α,C u α,τα, z max α) define an equivalent up-down<br />

counter with state space<br />

Z α := {0,α,2α,..., z max α}.<br />

In the special case where<br />

C d = C u = τ = z max ,<br />

the decisions produced by the up-down counter are identical to those produced by the<br />

original decision function (i.e., dk ˆ = d k , for all k).<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!