16.11.2014 Views

programma & abstracts - Nederlandse Vereniging voor Radiologie

programma & abstracts - Nederlandse Vereniging voor Radiologie

programma & abstracts - Nederlandse Vereniging voor Radiologie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mammadiagnostiek 1 4<br />

tly be visualized for evaluation in most patients.<br />

To date, 50 patients are evaluated: 3D-US evaluation of the<br />

breast shows a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 97%,<br />

compared to MR imaging findings (and histology). In coming<br />

months all 201 patients will be evaluated.<br />

Conclusion: In our study so far, 3D-US shows high sensitivity<br />

and specificity in the detection of suspicious lesions compared<br />

to MRI. Automated breast volume scanning seems a promising<br />

new ultrasound technique in breast evaluation.<br />

O4.3<br />

MEDICOLEGAL CLAIMS FOLLOWING<br />

SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

V. van Breest Smallenburg, W. Setz-Pels, F.H. Jansen,<br />

L.E.M. Duijm<br />

Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven<br />

Purpose: To determine the type and frequency of medicolegal<br />

claims at a Dutch breast cancer screening programme.<br />

Materials and methods: The study population consisted of<br />

all 80019 women who underwent screening mammography<br />

at a southern breast screening region of the Netherlands<br />

between January 1997 and July 2007 (301139 screens). We<br />

included all medicolegal claims that had been recorded at the<br />

central screening department within 3 years following screening<br />

mammography. During 2-year follow-up, we collected the<br />

biopsy results and surgery reports of all referred women. Two<br />

screening radiologists reviewed the screening mammograms<br />

of all screen detected cancers (SDC) and interval cancers (IC)<br />

and determined whether the cancer had been missed at the<br />

previous screen (in case of SDC) or latest screen (in case of<br />

IC). The radiologists were blinded to each others review; discrepant<br />

readings were followed by consensus reading.<br />

Results: Just 3 medicolegal claims had been reported,<br />

all of them related to financial compensation following a<br />

diagnosis of IC. The verdicts of these cases still have to be<br />

finalized. Excisional biopsy had been performed in 10.7%<br />

(234/2183) of false positive referrals. Review showed that<br />

20.8% (261/1254) of SDC had been missed at the previous<br />

screen and 23.6% (139/588) of IC should have been detected<br />

at the latest screen.<br />

Conclusions: Medicolegal claims were very rare, although<br />

a substantial proportion of false positive referred women<br />

had been confronted with excision biopsy and over 20% of<br />

cancers had been missed at the previous screen or latest<br />

screen, respectively.<br />

O4.4<br />

RADIOFREQUENCY-ASSISTED INTACT<br />

SPECIMEN BIOPSY OF BREAST TUMORS:<br />

AN EVALUATION ACCORDING TO THE<br />

IDEAL GUIDELINES<br />

S.C.E. Diepstraten 1 , H.M. Verkooijen 1 , P.J. van Diest 1 ,<br />

M.A. Fernandez-Gallardo 1 , K.M. Duvivier 1 , A.J. Witkamp 1 ,<br />

T. van Dalen 2 , W.P.Th.M. Mali 1 , M.A.A.J. van den Bosch 1<br />

1<br />

Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht<br />

2<br />

Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht<br />

Purpose: Radiofrequency-assisted intact specimen biopsy<br />

(RFIB) has been introduced for percutaneous biopsy or<br />

removal of breast tumors. Using radiofrequency cutting,<br />

the system enables the interventional radiologist to obtain<br />

an intact sample of the target lesion. According to IDEAL<br />

guidelines, we performed a critical evaluation of our initial<br />

experience with RFIB.<br />

Methods: Between June and November of 2010, X-ray guided<br />

RFIB was performed in 19 female patients. All patients<br />

presented with suspicious microcalcifications (BI-RADS<br />

III-V) on mammography. Biopsy specimen integrity, thermal<br />

damage and histological diagnosis were assessed by an<br />

expert breast pathologist. Data on technical success,<br />

diagnostic and therapeutic accuracy and peri-procedural<br />

complications were collected and analyzed according to the<br />

IDEAL guidelines.<br />

Results: Median age was 59 years. Median lesion diameter<br />

on mammography was 8 mm (range 2-76 mm). The procedure<br />

was successful in 17/19 (89%) patients and unsuccessful<br />

in 2/19 (11%) patients (1 nonrepresentative sample,<br />

1 sample with extensive thermal damage). Histological<br />

analysis of the RFIB specimen revealed 12/19 (63%) benign<br />

lesions and 7/19 (37%) malignancies (4 DCIS lesions and 3<br />

invasive ductal carcinomas). In 1 patient a DCIS lesion was<br />

completely removed with RFIB. Overall, 3 peri-procedural<br />

complications occurred (1 wound leakage, 1 arterial hemorrhage<br />

and 1 infection requiring oral antibiotics).<br />

Conclusion: Tissue sampling of suspicious breast lesions<br />

can be performed successfully with RFIB. In 1 patient DCIS<br />

was radically excised with RFIB, which illustrates its potential<br />

as a minimally invasive therapeutic procedure for removal<br />

of small breast tumors. This is an interesting focus for<br />

further research when larger probe sizes become available.<br />

1 6 E R A D I O L O G E N D A G E N - 2 9 e n 3 0 S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 1<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!