16.11.2014 Views

programma & abstracts - Nederlandse Vereniging voor Radiologie

programma & abstracts - Nederlandse Vereniging voor Radiologie

programma & abstracts - Nederlandse Vereniging voor Radiologie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6<br />

<strong>programma</strong> <strong>abstracts</strong> & <strong>abstracts</strong><br />

Sessie 6<br />

Abdominale radiologie 2<br />

Vrijdag 30 september, 10.45 - 12.15 uur<br />

O6.1<br />

EVALUATION OF A STANDARDIZED CT<br />

COLONOGRAPHY TRAINING PROGRAM IN<br />

NOVICE READER<br />

M.H. Liedenbaum 1 , S. Bipat 1 , P.M.M. Bossuyt 1 ,<br />

R.S. Dwarkasing 2 , M.C. de Haan 1 , R.J. Jansen 1 ,<br />

D. Kauffman 1 , C. van der Leij 1 , M.S. de Lijster 1 , C.C. Lute 1 ,<br />

M.P. van der Paardt 1 , M.G. Thomeer 2 , I.J.A. Zijlstra 1 ,<br />

J. Stoker 1<br />

1<br />

Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam<br />

2<br />

Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam<br />

Purpose: To determine how many CT colonography (CTC) training<br />

examinations have to be evaluated by novice readers to<br />

obtain an adequate level of competence in polyp detection.<br />

Methods: Informed consent was obtained from all participants.<br />

Six physicians (one radiologist, three radiology<br />

residents, two researchers) and three technicians completed<br />

a CTC training program. 200 CTC’s with colonoscopic verification<br />

were selected from a research database, with 100<br />

CTC’s with at least one polyp ≥6mm. After a lecture session<br />

and an individual hands-on training, CTC reading was done<br />

individually with immediate feedback of the colonoscopy<br />

outcome. The increase in per-polyp sensitivity was calculated<br />

for four sets of 50 CTC’s for lesions ≥6mm. Using logistic<br />

regression analyses, the number of CTC’s to reach 90%<br />

sensitivity for lesions ≥6mm was estimated. Reading times<br />

were registered.<br />

Results: The average per-polyp sensitivity for lesions<br />

≥6mm was 76% (207/270) in the first set of 50 CTC’s,<br />

77% (262/342) in the second set (p=0.96 vs. first set), 80%<br />

(310/387) in the third set (p=0.67 vs. first set) and 91%<br />

(261/288) in the fourth set (p=0.018). The estimated number<br />

of CTC’s to be evaluated to reach a sufficient sensitivity for<br />

lesions ≥6mm was 164. Six of the nine readers reached<br />

this level of competence within 175 CTC’s. Reading times<br />

decreased significantly from the first 50 CTC’s to the second<br />

50 CTC’s for 6 readers.<br />

Conclusions: Novice CT colonography readers obtained a<br />

sensitivity equal to that of experienced readers after practicing<br />

on average 164 CTC studies.<br />

O6.2<br />

THE FEASIBILITY OF TRAINING<br />

RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS IN<br />

TRIAGING CT-COLONOGRAPHY FOR<br />

EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS<br />

T.N. Boellaard, C.Y. Nio, P.M. Bossuyt, J. Stoker<br />

Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam<br />

Purpose: Cost-effectiveness is important for the implementation<br />

of CT-colonography as a screening tool for colorectal<br />

cancer. Radiologists’ reading time contributes substantially<br />

to CT-colonography costs. Therefore we evaluate the<br />

feasibility of radiologic technologists in triaging screening<br />

CT-colonography for extracolonic findings.<br />

Method and materials: Eight technologists participated in<br />

a training program and subsequently reported extracolonic<br />

findings in 280 CT-colonography exams. The dataset<br />

contained 86 possibly (E3) and 30 probably important (E4)<br />

findings (C-RADS). The first and last 40 cases were identical<br />

examination cases. Feedback was given after each case<br />

from reference standard (the consensus read by two radiologists),<br />

except for the examination cases. Technologists<br />

reported lesion location and characteristics, C-RADS classification,<br />

need for a radiologist’s read and reading time.<br />

We constructed learning curves for correct scan and lesion<br />

triaging using a moving average technique.<br />

Results: For the final exam 70% of scans with E3 or E4<br />

findings were correctly triaged, while 30.5% of scans<br />

without E3 or E4 findings were incorrectly triaged. For the<br />

final exam technologists correctly identified and classified<br />

64.4%(67/104) of E3 and 67.5%(27/40) of E4 findings.<br />

This is an improvement, compared to the first exam, of<br />

33.6%(p0.05). The learning curve for<br />

E3 and E4 findings combined did not reach a plateau after<br />

280 cases. The technologists’ average reading time decreased<br />

from 11:51 to 4:13 minutes(p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!