Activity Report 2010 - CNRS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$AASTEX, AMS math, and LATEX symbols Table 1: Additional ...$

OVERVIEW THE NANOSCIENCES FOUNDATION’S IMPACT Financial and human supports viewed in two tables At the end of 2010, the total support to technological equals 5.62 M€, with more than its 2/3 given within the first two calls, as it was planned from start. The support for the scientific animation, schools and scientific events has been around 60 k€ for the last two years. 14 These raw figures along with the scientific information given in the next sections of this report give an overview of the magnitude of the efforts implemented by the Nanosciences Foundation. The main part of its activity is not made visible by a fast look at these raw data. The Foundation acts as a specific catalyser in a field of science where the human initiatives play a key-role and the main fuel (salaries, fluids, buildings, diversity of supports...) comes from the four founding members: CEA, CNRS, Grenoble-INP and University Joseph Fourier.
The Nanosciences Foundation budget Resources The Foundation can spend every year a maximum amount of 4 680 k€ during the 5 years over the period 2007-2011, which is the consumable part of the capital given by the Ministry in 2007 with the addition of the annual contribution of the founding members. After 2012, it will be allowed to employ the remaining part of the unused part of this capital, i.e. 4 833 k€ which was not spent at the end of 2009, as a consequence of the low level of the initial expenses in the Foundation’s first year. OVERVIEW The financial incomes can be used with no time restriction. At the end of 2009 the remaining financial incomes reach 1 423 k€. Therefore, financial resources of the Foundation are large enough to support runs in 2012 and 2013. The partnership with INRIA signed on the 26 th of May 2010 provides in addition 100 k€ to the Foundation, every year from 2010 to 2013. Considering the international financial crisis and the new inputs of the French research policy, the process of fundraising has been reconsidered in accordance to the conclusions of the dedicated mission given by “Ianmore Associates” (February 2010). The board session held on December 17, 2010 took the decision to split the remaining resources between two calls for proposals to be launched in 2011 and 2012, in order to attribute financial supports from 2011 to 2013 or 2014. Expenditures and Commitments The financial support given to a yearly call for proposals is generally spread, over 3 calendar years. The budget of a current year includes in addition the expenses for the Foundation management (salaries of the administrative staff and operating expenses) and the payments related to the commitments of the year (N), but also those related to the previous calls (year N-1 and N-2). The table below gives the distribution of the expenses during the years 2007 to 2010. The financial line dedicated to salaries directly paid by the Foundation is increasing, as a result of Board’s decisions. Commitments taking into account all calls for proposals, including the last one in 2012, have been double checked in relation with the lowest profile of expected resources from financial income. Hence the Foundation will be able to support all the expenses without using the non-consumable part (10%) of the capital initially given by the Ministry and the founding members, i.e. 2 600 k€. 15
Page 3 and 4: Date of publication: May 2011 We wo
Page 5: Nanosciences Foundation Activity Re
Page 9 and 10: Part I: ACHIEVEMENTS & PROSPECTS Th
Page 11 and 12: THE NANOSCIENCES FOUNDATION AT THE
Page 13 and 14: OUTSTANDING BENEFITS CATALYZED BY T
Page 15 and 16: The laureates of the 2010 Chairs of
Page 17 and 18: ‘Mobilité d’Excellence’: a n
Page 19 and 20: INTEGRATION ON SITE BETWEEN BASIC R
Page 21: OVERVIEW Fig.3: LANEF framework. Ba
Page 25 and 26: The evolution of the funding progra
Page 27 and 28: OVERVIEW Fig. 6: Total number of vi
Page 29 and 30: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS One couldn’t fin
Page 31 and 32: Part II: SCIENTIFIC REPORT 1 - QUAN
Page 33 and 34: 1 - QUANTUM NANOELECTRONICS Moore
Page 35 and 36: Core/shell nanowires: conductance C
Page 37 and 38: 2 - NANOMAGNETISM AND SPINTRONICS B
Page 39 and 40: than 10 8 V/m and to compare this t
Page 41 and 42: sites. The calculations indicate th
Page 43 and 44: 3 - NANOPHOTONICS The optical prope
Page 45 and 46: Cavity-feeding : decoherence as a r
Page 47 and 48: 4 - MOLECULAR ELECTRONICS Molecular
Page 49 and 50: 5 - NANOMATERIALS, NANOASSEMBLY AND
Page 51 and 52: Phase-change memory RTRA Project 20
Page 53 and 54: 6 - NANO- CHARACTERISATION AND NANO
Page 55 and 56: when compared, for example, to the
Page 57 and 58: 7 - NANO APPROACHES TO LIFE SCIENCE
Page 59 and 60: Innovative biochips to detect and s
Page 61 and 62: Implantable brain computer interfac
Page 63 and 64: 8 - NANOMODELING, THEORY & SIMULATI
Page 65 and 66: Growth, patterning, defects & struc
Page 67 and 68: 9 - TECHNOLOGICAL FACILITIES Create
Page 69 and 70: CRG: The French Cooperative Researc
Page 71 and 72: The Numerical Simulation Facility T
Page 73 and 74:
10 - EDUCATION AND SCIENTIFIC ANIMA
Page 75 and 76:
Q-NET: a new European Initial Train
Page 77 and 78:
Thesis Prize Award Ceremonies 2009
Page 79 and 80:
2010 Speaker From Date Title Resear
Page 81 and 82:
Workshop “Super Resolution Optica
Page 83 and 84:
Workshop “Electronic Noise and Re
Page 85 and 86:
Workshop « New trends in Electrica
Page 87 and 88:
List of the Quantum Nanoelectronics
Page 89 and 90:
Hélène LE SUEUR Laboratoire de Ph
Page 91:
Quantum Nanoelectronics Seminars in
Page 94 and 95:
Invitations to talk at seminars: "
Page 96 and 97:
- Anton ANDREEV (University of Wash
Page 98 and 99:
Cellulose Hybrid block copolymers /
Page 100 and 101:
PART 3 S. J. C. Yates, J. J. A. Bas
Page 102 and 103:
D. A. Stewart, I. Savic, and N. Min
Page 104 and 105:
DISPOGRAPH / RTRA project Post-doct
Page 106 and 107:
2009 Call for Proposals MUSCADE Cha
Page 108 and 109:
Piotr Laczkowski, Danny Hykel, Serg
Page 111:
Part IV: SUPPLEMENTS Appendix 1: th
Page 114 and 115:
Appendix 2: the Foundation’s boar
Page 116 and 117:
Appendix 4: the Steering Committee
Page 118 and 119:
RTRA projects support Major topic A
Page 120 and 121:
Appendix 6: 2010 Call for Proposals
Page 122 and 123:
Education and Scientific Animation
Page 124 and 125:
2008 Call for Proposals Name Nation
Page 126 and 127:
Appendix 8: List of the Post Doc Fe
Page 128 and 129:
Appendix 9: List of the PhD student
Page 130 and 131:
PhD students supported in 2010 Name
Page 132 and 133:
Appendix 11: List of the Reviewers
Page 134 and 135:
2010 Call for Proposals Reviewer La
Page 136 and 137:
Nom du laboratoire Département de
Page 138 and 139:
Nom du laboratoire GRENOBLE INSTITU
Page 140 and 141:
Nom du laboratoire Institut de Micr
Page 142 and 143:
Nom du laboratoire Institut Fourier
Page 144 and 145:
Nom du laboratoire Institut Néel I
Page 146 and 147:
Nom du laboratoire Laboratoire d'In
Page 148 and 149:
Nom du laboratoire Laboratoire de P
Page 150 and 151:
SUPPLEMENTS 5 : Très nombreuses vi
Page 152 and 153:
Nom du laboratoire Laboratoire Inte
Page 154 and 155:
Nom du laboratoire Laboratoire Nati
Page 156 and 157:
Nom du laboratoire Techniques de l
Page 158 and 159:
SUPPLEMENTS 48
Page 160:
HIGHLIGHTS QUANTUM NANOELECTRONICS:
Page 163 and 164:
FIB NANO- TOMOGRAPHY OF DEFECTS IN
Page 165 and 166:
DETECTING SINGLE NANOPARTICLE MAGNE
Page 167 and 168:
QUANTUM HETEROSTRUCTURES IN II-VI N
Page 169 and 170:
ELECMOL’10 CONFERENCE An importan
Page 171 and 172:
CRISTAL PHASE TRANSITIONS IN PRESSU
Page 173 and 174:
SCANNING GATE NANOELECTRONICS In th
Page 175 and 176:
CONTROL OF THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY AT
Page 178 and 179:
Roland HERINO (past Director) Jean-
show all

Activity Report 2010 - CNRS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?