25.11.2014 Views

Biostatistics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

352 CHAPTER 8 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE<br />

in knowing if there were differences between the two treatments on subjects that were<br />

measured multiple times.<br />

Assumptions The assumptions of the two-factor repeated measures design are the same<br />

as the single-factor repeated measures design. However, it is not uncommon for there to be<br />

interactions among the treatments in this design, a potential violation of Assumption 5,<br />

above. Interaction effects can be interesting to examine, but are complex to calculate. For<br />

this reason, and at the level of the intended audience using this text, we will assume that<br />

interaction effects, when present, are mathematically handled using a statistical software<br />

package that provides correct calculations for this issue.<br />

The Model The model for the two-factor repeated measures design must represent the<br />

fact that there are two factors, A and B, and they have a potential interaction. These<br />

features, along with the block effect and error, must be accounted for in the model, which is<br />

given by<br />

x ijk ¼ m þ r ij þ a i þ b j þðabÞ ij<br />

þ e ijk<br />

i ¼ 1; 2; ...; a; j ¼ 1; 2; ...; b; k ¼ 1; 2; ...; n<br />

(8.4.2)<br />

In this model<br />

x ijk is a typical individual from the overall population<br />

m an unknown constant<br />

r ij represents a block effect<br />

a j represents the main effect of factor A<br />

b k represents the main effect of factor B<br />

ðabÞ jk<br />

represents the interaction effect of factor A and factor B<br />

e ijk is a residual component representing all sources of variation other than treatments<br />

and blocks.<br />

This model is very similar to the two-factor ANOVA model presented in Section 8.5.<br />

EXAMPLE 8.4.2<br />

The Mid-Michigan Medical Center (A-16) examined 25 subjects with neck cancer and<br />

measured as one of the outcome variables an oral health condition score. Patients were<br />

randomly divided into two treatment groups. These were a placebo treatment (treatment 1)<br />

and an aloe juice group (treatment 2). Cancer health was measured at baseline and at the<br />

end of 2, 4, and 6 weeks of treatment. The goal was to discern if there was any change in<br />

oral health condition over the course of the experiment and to see if there were any<br />

differences between the two treatment conditions.<br />

Solution:<br />

1. Data. See Table 8.4.2.<br />

2. Assumptions. We assume that the assumptions for the two-factor<br />

repeated measures experiment are met.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!