Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
'<br />
Dr<br />
C ?8 5<br />
Ergo, The^ifible Church is in part ma(?e up of little Gfailr<br />
Ruffcl. There is fo much Nonrenfe in this Argument, I<br />
fnow not well how to make Senfe of it : It feems to me little<br />
o the piirpofe. But however. I will deny your Minor and<br />
ay, Ir is good Senfe to fay, that little Children belong to the<br />
kingdom of Qlory. .<br />
! pray ohferv! {by the way) -oohat fort ef<br />
,<br />
uhjeBs Mr Leigh/<br />
Zhurch mufl confiji of\<br />
if they have no IntereJI in the Graces of the<br />
Kingdom, nor yet in the .Glory cf the Kingdom.<br />
Mr- Leigh. I fay it'sNonfenfe to underftanl Itotherwife.<br />
And uoon this he defired, that a^l rhore who were fati^^ied<br />
with what he had faid fliould hoV up their hands. And of<br />
that great Multitude, there was but a very few that did it :<br />
So<br />
that it-was manifeft they were not fatisfied with what he had<br />
faid.<br />
:<br />
Mr. Williams. Is it Nonfenfe then to fay, that any Infants<br />
belong CO the Kingdom of Glory ?<br />
Mr.Vetgh. Yes, while they are in their Infant State; for<br />
trhtn arrived to Glory they are perfeft as grown men, whatever<br />
they were on Earth. Otherwife we muft fay that there<br />
are Infants of two foot long, poor, weak, ignorant things m<br />
Glory : Therefore it muft be thus taken, for we muft make<br />
good Senfe of Scripture.<br />
Mr. miliams. I deny your minor, and fliall form an oppoflte<br />
Argument thus<br />
_<br />
If infants are neither Members of the Univerfal vifiDle<br />
Church, nor yet of a particular conftituted Church, then they<br />
are not members of the vifible Church at all<br />
-. , .<br />
,,<br />
But they are neither members of the Univerfal viUble<br />
Church, nor yet of a particular conftitured Church;<br />
Therefore they are not members of the villble Church at all.<br />
Mr. Ltigh took no notice of this Argument^ but Jaid, It did<br />
not belong to a Rcfpondent to form an Argument.<br />
To vph:ch Mr. Williams replfd. My Work is to clear the<br />
Truth ; I will not be ty'd up to your Rules oi Oifputarion.<br />
M'-. R3''/«j^« required an exprcfs prohibition of Infants<br />
C'liarch memberfiiip.<br />
Mr. Williams reply d, That is fine indeed ;<br />
Pray give us an<br />
cxorefs prohibition of baptizing with Cream, and Spjtrle, and<br />
Salt, and Ovl and the ufe of the Crofs in Baptifm: (all which<br />
;<br />
you rejea j and of many things more that might be brought<br />
ir.ro the Worlhlp of God. j^nd to this m Reply was made.<br />
Mr. Leigh inltpng again upon his Jrgum':nt for excluding In^<br />
fmti m ofthi Kingdom of Heaven, fnm Matth. 19. affirmtvg^<br />
:<br />
,