21.12.2014 Views

im

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

'<br />

Dr<br />

C ?8 5<br />

Ergo, The^ifible Church is in part ma(?e up of little Gfailr<br />

Ruffcl. There is fo much Nonrenfe in this Argument, I<br />

fnow not well how to make Senfe of it : It feems to me little<br />

o the piirpofe. But however. I will deny your Minor and<br />

ay, Ir is good Senfe to fay, that little Children belong to the<br />

kingdom of Qlory. .<br />

! pray ohferv! {by the way) -oohat fort ef<br />

,<br />

uhjeBs Mr Leigh/<br />

Zhurch mufl confiji of\<br />

if they have no IntereJI in the Graces of the<br />

Kingdom, nor yet in the .Glory cf the Kingdom.<br />

Mr- Leigh. I fay it'sNonfenfe to underftanl Itotherwife.<br />

And uoon this he defired, that a^l rhore who were fati^^ied<br />

with what he had faid fliould hoV up their hands. And of<br />

that great Multitude, there was but a very few that did it :<br />

So<br />

that it-was manifeft they were not fatisfied with what he had<br />

faid.<br />

:<br />

Mr. Williams. Is it Nonfenfe then to fay, that any Infants<br />

belong CO the Kingdom of Glory ?<br />

Mr.Vetgh. Yes, while they are in their Infant State; for<br />

trhtn arrived to Glory they are perfeft as grown men, whatever<br />

they were on Earth. Otherwife we muft fay that there<br />

are Infants of two foot long, poor, weak, ignorant things m<br />

Glory : Therefore it muft be thus taken, for we muft make<br />

good Senfe of Scripture.<br />

Mr. miliams. I deny your minor, and fliall form an oppoflte<br />

Argument thus<br />

_<br />

If infants are neither Members of the Univerfal vifiDle<br />

Church, nor yet of a particular conftituted Church, then they<br />

are not members of the vifible Church at all<br />

-. , .<br />

,,<br />

But they are neither members of the Univerfal viUble<br />

Church, nor yet of a particular conftitured Church;<br />

Therefore they are not members of the villble Church at all.<br />

Mr. Ltigh took no notice of this Argument^ but Jaid, It did<br />

not belong to a Rcfpondent to form an Argument.<br />

To vph:ch Mr. Williams replfd. My Work is to clear the<br />

Truth ; I will not be ty'd up to your Rules oi Oifputarion.<br />

M'-. R3''/«j^« required an exprcfs prohibition of Infants<br />

C'liarch memberfiiip.<br />

Mr. Williams reply d, That is fine indeed ;<br />

Pray give us an<br />

cxorefs prohibition of baptizing with Cream, and Spjtrle, and<br />

Salt, and Ovl and the ufe of the Crofs in Baptifm: (all which<br />

;<br />

you rejea j and of many things more that might be brought<br />

ir.ro the Worlhlp of God. j^nd to this m Reply was made.<br />

Mr. Leigh inltpng again upon his Jrgum':nt for excluding In^<br />

fmti m ofthi Kingdom of Heaven, fnm Matth. 19. affirmtvg^<br />

:<br />

,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!