03.01.2015 Views

Geologic Map of the Maysville Quadrangle, Chaffee County, Colorado

Geologic Map of the Maysville Quadrangle, Chaffee County, Colorado

Geologic Map of the Maysville Quadrangle, Chaffee County, Colorado

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

y <strong>the</strong> North Fork leucogranite (Tnfg) about 400 ft west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Maysville</strong> quadrangle west<br />

boundary.<br />

The Mount Princeton pluton is generally discordant to foliation and gneissic<br />

layering in Proterozoic rocks and to bedding in Paleozoic sedimentary rocks. Shannon<br />

(1988) reviewed <strong>the</strong> overall attitude <strong>of</strong> contacts along <strong>the</strong> margin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pluton. Most <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> pluton contacts are steep with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn and sou<strong>the</strong>rn margins,<br />

which plunge moderately to shallowly north and moderately south, respectively. The<br />

sou<strong>the</strong>astern contact, including <strong>the</strong> segment crossing <strong>the</strong> northwest corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Maysville</strong> quadrangle, is nearly vertical to steeply inward (northwest) dipping. Within <strong>the</strong><br />

Mount Princeton pluton (largely preserved in <strong>the</strong> Mount Aetna cauldron collapse<br />

structure in <strong>the</strong> St. Elmo quadrangle), low dips <strong>of</strong> broad, internal textural and<br />

compositional units suggest that <strong>the</strong> pluton had a relatively broad, flat ro<strong>of</strong> that was<br />

gently tilted southward during collapse <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mount Aetna cauldron.<br />

Many previous workers have noted textural and compositional variations in <strong>the</strong><br />

Mount Princeton pluton (Crawford, 1913; Dings and Robinson, 1957; Limbach, 1975;<br />

Sharp, 1976; R.P. Smith, 1979, unpublished reconnaissance map and 1981, personal<br />

communication; Shannon, 1988; Toulmin and Hammarstrom, 1990; and McCalpin and<br />

Shannon, 2005). Shannon (1988) described and delineated a number <strong>of</strong> systematic<br />

textural and compositional variations in <strong>the</strong> pluton. The pluton was divided into a border<br />

unit with three subunits and an interior unit with three subunits. The Mount Princeton<br />

border unit is mostly preserved in <strong>the</strong> Mount Aetna cauldron collapse structure in <strong>the</strong><br />

sou<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> St. Elmo quadrangle.<br />

The genetic relations <strong>of</strong> compositional-textural units along <strong>the</strong> ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mount<br />

Princeton pluton have been variably interpreted and are problematic. The Mount<br />

Pomeroy quartz monzonite was interpreted as a separate earlier intrusion by Crawford<br />

(1913) and Dings and Robinson (1957). It is mainly preserved in <strong>the</strong> Mount Aetna<br />

cauldron collapse structure, in a 7 mile long and 0.5 to 1.5 mile wide, N60°E-trending<br />

zone. Toulmin (1976), Shannon (1988) and Toulmin and Hammarstrom (1990) suggested<br />

that <strong>the</strong> Mount Pomeroy quartz monzonite is a ro<strong>of</strong> facies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mount Princeton pluton.<br />

Shannon (1988) suggested that <strong>the</strong> Mount Princeton border unit be defined as <strong>the</strong> broad<br />

zone <strong>of</strong> heterogeneous textures and compositions along <strong>the</strong> ro<strong>of</strong> zone, and locally along<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!