WAR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a powerful one, but that hardly mattered—the goals for which Fokker and Platz<br />
were shooting were manoeuvrability and a good rate of climb, rather than speed<br />
and high ceiling.<br />
Except for the first three production models which were labeled F I, the<br />
Fokker Triplane bore the standard army designation Fok Dr I,<br />
Fokker Triplane design.<br />
meaning the first<br />
The Dr I, even with three wings, had far less wing area than its biplane<br />
contemporaries—200 square feet, as compared to 229 for the Albatros D V, 238<br />
for the Pfalz D III, or 227 for the Spad 13. Its design balanced this reduction<br />
of supporting surface with a thick aerofoil section which gave relatively greater<br />
lift (and drag too, but the goal was manoeuvrability, not speed.) Its wings were<br />
short and narrow, giving little lateral resistance, and its fuselage was short— 18<br />
feet, even shorter than that of the Camel. The Dr I, moreover, was of the<br />
standard Fokker steel-tube construction with hollow box-spar wings, and was<br />
therefore light, a featherweight, in fact. Its weight was 1200 pounds, while the<br />
Spad, S.E.5, Albatros and Pfalz all weighed in at about a ton.<br />
The Dr. I could fly rings around any machine at the Front. Its rate of climb<br />
was remarkable— it could shoot up a mile in two and a half minutes, nearly twice<br />
as fast as the Sopwith Triplane. Its manoeuvrability was fantastic—it could turn<br />
on a dime. Fokker conceded that it was slow, but he said Allied pilots never had<br />
a chance to find out how slow it was because of the way it stunted.<br />
Hermann Becker, the German Ace, recently recounted how he scored a<br />
victory with the Triplane early in 1918 by taking advantage of its agility.<br />
A French pilot in a Spad met Becker head-on in a challenge of nerves.<br />
Both flew straight at the other, both held their fire. At the last instant they<br />
broke, swerved, each rolling away to his right. They passed so close Becker could<br />
feel the wind of the other's passing, could look the Frenchman in the eye. Each<br />
now had one object, to get around behind the other man. The Triplane was so<br />
handy that Becker was around and on the Spad's tail almost before the Spad had<br />
begun to turn. He was right on it when he triggered a killing burst straight into<br />
the cockpit, "er oder ich." The Frenchman had had one chance, to dive, but<br />
he hadn't taken it, so he was done for. No machine could turn inside the Fokker<br />
Triplane. It was a winner; so was Werner Voss. The two of them together made<br />
what was perhaps the outstanding combination of pilot<br />
and aeroplane of the war.<br />
Within a few weeks of having returned to the Front and having, along<br />
with the Rittmeister, introduced the new machine, Voss had run his score up to<br />
48, shooting down an enemy aeroplane nearly every day.<br />
In the early evening hours of September 23, 1917, Voss was out alone<br />
scouting the lines near Poelcappelle. The air was clear below 9000 feet except<br />
for the beginnings of a ground haze, while above 9000 feet a dense layer of<br />
cloud spread wide across the sky. As the sun dropped lower it occasionally<br />
managed to cast a few dull gleams through rifts in the ceiling. A patrol of S.E.5's<br />
from No. 56 Squadron RFC had just shot down a German two-seater and was<br />
climbing in formation back up toward the cloud layer when the pilots spotted<br />
128