04.01.2015 Views

WAR

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

that struck the propeller. It was estimated that fewer than ten per cent of the<br />

bullets would strike the propeller. If it is accepted that the most useful direction<br />

of fire in a chase context is straight ahead, then it will be seen that the major<br />

problem of an accessible gun firing through the propeller had been solved.<br />

A new weapon, the fighter, had been forged. Until it was wielded with killing<br />

intent, however, the sky was relatively peaceful. A few aviators carried weapons<br />

with them when they flew, but they were the exception.<br />

In the German air service<br />

Leutnant Wilhelm Siegert, later Inspector of Flying Troops, carried a carbine<br />

with a gramophone horn nailed to the stock— "so that in the event of meeting<br />

an enemy I might at least dismay and terrify him with its illusory calibre."<br />

air-fighting as a tactical practice was still not foreseen. Or not so much not<br />

foreseen as not given more than the briefest consideration. Until the war was<br />

going into its fourth month everyone had thought it would be over in three and<br />

the air would be superfluous because the battles and the war would be won<br />

on the ground.<br />

There was work to be done, of course, but the military staffs did not expect<br />

that the aeroplane would ever replace the cavalryman's horse as a means of<br />

getting observers out and back. The aeroplane was not considered a weapon in<br />

itself any more than the horse was.<br />

The casual armament that was carried in aeroplanes was more for defense<br />

in the event of a forced-landing behind the lines than for offensive action in the<br />

air. The observers, being usually officers, had their own side arms such as<br />

automatic or machine pistols which they carried with them while flying, and<br />

the enlisted men were regularly issued carbines. With improvised mountings<br />

like that in the Voisin of Frantz and Quenault even machine guns might be taken<br />

along. But it was common for crews to fly with no armament at all.<br />

The French were of two minds about the war. Some thought it grand sport,<br />

but most were serious about it. After all, the war was being fought in home<br />

country. The British, many of them, regarded it as a grotesque and colossal joke.<br />

Britain was as usual safely insulated by the Channel. It's a pretty big difference.<br />

The Germans were impelled by duty, Vaterland, Lebensraum and other large ideas.<br />

All of the airmen had this in common: they flew because it interested them,<br />

all<br />

were volunteers, and they craved excitement. They were young.<br />

Flying was exciting and different, with or without a war, and many pilots<br />

and observers felt a comradeship with enemy airmen. In late 1914 and early 1915<br />

it was still a lark to take along a rifle and have a sporting shot at any opposite<br />

numbers one might come across. No one expected to get hurt, no one seriously<br />

expected to shoot anyone down. When, on occasion, it chanced that unarmed<br />

crews should meet, they could fire colored signal flares at each other.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!