12.01.2015 Views

WP6-Brochure-E4 brochure - ELA European Lift Association.

WP6-Brochure-E4 brochure - ELA European Lift Association.

WP6-Brochure-E4 brochure - ELA European Lift Association.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

not rate an item. Reasons for non‐rating were various, e.g. respondents stating they did not<br />

have any knowledge on a certain topic or not providing clear answers. The barriers that were<br />

rated to be most relevant are coloured red, those least important, green. These highlights<br />

provide a homogeneous picture: barriers to energy efficiency – from the point of view of the<br />

experts surveyed – are mainly due to lack of information and transparency regarding energy<br />

consumption of equipment (cf. operators not monitoring energy costs, decision‐makers not<br />

aware of energy consumption) and split incentive issues in relation to bounded rationality (cf.<br />

energy costs not paid by decision‐maker, investment more important than life‐cycle costs,<br />

components would be more efficient if operators had more transparency). Risks and<br />

uncertainties play a minor role, as shown by the green highlights, while capital issues received<br />

middle‐range ratings. However, the items on lack of capital in new installations and retrofit<br />

were also those which are based on the lowest number of ratings, i.e. nine and ten<br />

respondents respectively did not provide a rating.<br />

Information and transaction costs<br />

In general, ratings indicate that, in the experience of the experts interviewed, it is not common<br />

that operators of lifts or escalators regularly monitor the energy consumption of their<br />

equipment. In most cases, no technical appliances are installed that would enable regular<br />

monitoring; thus the energy consumption of lifts and escalators cannot be separated from<br />

other equipment, e.g. lighting, automatic doors.<br />

This is seen as related to the fact that individuals choosing equipment as well as operators and<br />

users are not aware of the energy consumption of the equipment. Due to a low degree of<br />

awareness, no measurement devices are installed – and due to missing data, individuals do not<br />

become aware of potentials to increase the energy efficiency of their installations.<br />

Information on energy‐efficient technology is, however, not regarded as especially difficult to<br />

obtain. Main sources of information that were identified by the respondents are, however, the<br />

manufacturers and their sales representatives. Thus neutral sources of information are missing<br />

or insufficiently known. 5 The experts emphasised that the knowledge provided by sales<br />

representatives is usually restricted to the technology used by their company and that energyefficient<br />

technology is sometimes too new to be fully understood, even by company<br />

representatives. Additionally, clients are seen as usually having little knowledge themselves,<br />

and thus do not inquire about relevant data.<br />

Split incentives and bounded rationality<br />

Split incentives between general contractors, owners of installations as well as those paying<br />

for the energy consumption of installations are also seen as a barrier hindering energy<br />

efficiency for lifts and escalators. The costs of energy consumption are usually paid by<br />

inhabitants – in the residential sector – who are not necessarily the owner of the building.<br />

Additionally, buildings including a lift or escalator are often erected by a general contractor for<br />

5 For example, in Germany, neutral information may be obtained from notified bodies.<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!