12.01.2015 Views

Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 1997 - Rparchives.org

Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 1997 - Rparchives.org

Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 1997 - Rparchives.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICA 91<br />

8.) The ordination vows should be so stated that the church n<br />

should not, allow exceptions to, or qualification <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

Report <strong>of</strong> the Judicial Committee re: Communication 97-7<br />

Paper 97-7 asks the <strong>Synod</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>1997</strong> to declare an action <strong>of</strong> the 1995 <strong>Synod</strong> to<br />

be out <strong>of</strong> order. The action was a special resolution that reads as follows:<br />

"Whereas we believe that the abstinence clause <strong>of</strong> ordination query #8 is<br />

not part <strong>of</strong> the New Testament description <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> elders and<br />

goes beyond the testimony <strong>of</strong> the church,<br />

and whereas a number <strong>of</strong> synods have voted to change this abstinence<br />

clause to bring It into conformity with the Word <strong>of</strong> God,<br />

and whereas a majority <strong>of</strong> elders has repeatedly voted to change this<br />

clause, while a minority <strong>of</strong> sessions has resisted reformation <strong>of</strong> ordination<br />

query #8,<br />

be it resolved by the <strong>Synod</strong> <strong>of</strong> 1995 that ecclesiastical discipline and<br />

exclusion from <strong>of</strong>fice be suspended for all who take exception to the<br />

abstinence clause <strong>of</strong> Query #8 for conscience's sake, provided that they<br />

commit themselves to Christian sobriety and love for the brethren and the<br />

peace <strong>of</strong> the church."<br />

The Judicial Committee agrees that the 1995 special resolution was improper<br />

for the following reason:<br />

The <strong>Synod</strong> has both a legislative and a judicial function. The <strong>Synod</strong> together<br />

with all <strong>of</strong> the Sessions has repeatedly failed legislatively to amend Query #8. As a<br />

judicial body the <strong>Synod</strong> could, <strong>of</strong> course, simply refuse to enforce the debated<br />

clause in Query #8. However, judicial precedents can only be set in response to<br />

specific and concrete judicial cases. It is never the province <strong>of</strong> a court to announce<br />

beforehand how it will rule in a case. Therefore, the Special Resolution adopted<br />

by the 1995 <strong>Synod</strong>, that ecclesiastical discipline in the matter <strong>of</strong> Query #8 will be<br />

suspended was both an improper usurpation <strong>of</strong> the legislative function and an<br />

improper effort to tie the hands <strong>of</strong> a future court.<br />

We recommend that:<br />

1.) The provision allowed by this special resolution be terminated.<br />

2.) That those who benefited while this special resolution was in effect be<br />

allowed to retain that benefit or yield that benefit, as their conscience allows.<br />

Respectfully Submitted,<br />

Godfrey Franklin<br />

Ge<strong>org</strong>e Hueber<br />

Philip Pockras<br />

Ed Schisler<br />

William J. Edgar, Chairman<br />

Christian Adjemian, Larry Bump, Brian Coombs, Tony Cowley, Gordon<br />

Keddie, Robert LaMay, Thomas Reid, Vince Scavo and Andrew Schep

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!