19.01.2015 Views

The Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects - PacifiCorp

The Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects - PacifiCorp

The Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects - PacifiCorp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Lewis</strong> <strong>River</strong> Interpretive & Education Plan<br />

<strong>PacifiCorp</strong> acquired most of the lands around its reservoirs in large parcels. In<br />

general, because the land was going to be part of the hydroelectric project, the<br />

owners of the parcels logged their lands before selling them to the company,<br />

to get as much out of them as possible. <strong>The</strong>refore, the forests that <strong>PacifiCorp</strong><br />

inherited were very young, dense, dark, and poor habitat. Other purchased lands<br />

included old farms, orchards, and homesites. During relicensing of the Merwin<br />

project in the 1980s, the Merwin Wildlife Habitat Management Plan was created<br />

to help enhance this relatively poor habitat, thereby increasing and sustaining<br />

populations of local wildlife (particularly elk).<br />

Forestry for Habitat<br />

<strong>The</strong> forest lands around Lake Merwin are currently being managed under the<br />

Merwin Wildlife Habitat Management Plan. Lands around Yale and Swift are<br />

now being managed in similar patterns. A new management plan is being<br />

written for the current settlement agreement that will encompass all three<br />

reservoirs. <strong>The</strong> general thrust of the management plan is to manage the lands<br />

for the benefit of wildlife; species of particular interest include owls, elk, deer,<br />

bald eagles, osprey, wetland birds, and passerine birds. This goal means that<br />

unlike many private (and some public) lands, these lands include areas where<br />

wildlife really does come first, and certain human uses (such as ORV use in the<br />

backcountry) are precluded.<br />

When the habitat programs were instigated, <strong>PacifiCorp</strong> lands were in a<br />

patchwork of conditions: older, second-generation forests, recent clearcuts, old<br />

farm fields and pastures, quarries, abandoned construction camps, etc. For the<br />

most part, however, these lands were not particularly good habitat for wildlife:<br />

some were barren, some were choked with invasive plants such as Scotch broom,<br />

and most were overgrown with dense, dark second-generation forests that had<br />

little or no understory vegetation.<br />

In general, wild animals that rely on forests for some or all of their lives need<br />

diversity of forest structure, including multi-layered canopies, a diversity of plant<br />

species, thriving understory vegetation, and wetland/meadow openings.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se conditions are inherent to what we call “old growth” forests. But there are<br />

very few areas of the <strong>PacifiCorp</strong> lands along the <strong>Lewis</strong> <strong>River</strong> that could truly<br />

be called “old growth.” For habitat purposes, old growth does not mean old<br />

trees—it’s the structural and species diversity that’s important. <strong>The</strong>refore, the<br />

main thrust of <strong>PacifiCorp</strong>’s habitat management plan is to impart structural and<br />

species diversity to forested lands.<br />

This doesn’t mean that all the land is managed to achieve an old-growth-like<br />

state. It just means that the lands are managed to provide elements necessary to<br />

support healthy wildlife populations, and that those elements are the products of<br />

diversity.<br />

Sea Reach Ltd • 146 NE yamhill Street • Sheridan, OR draft 3 • November 2008 • page 78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!