Customary Land Tenure in Liberia - Land Tenure and Property ...
Customary Land Tenure in Liberia - Land Tenure and Property ...
Customary Land Tenure in Liberia - Land Tenure and Property ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
105<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude: 1) law that grants legal recognition to l<strong>and</strong> claimed under customary tenure, 2) regulations that map<br />
out a process for systematically document<strong>in</strong>g the l<strong>and</strong> rights of rural communities based on custom, <strong>and</strong> 3)<br />
enactment <strong>and</strong> completion of that process at a national level. The moratorium need not occur over the whole<br />
country before any <strong>in</strong>vestment/concessions can take place, but rather could be prioritized on a case-by-case<br />
basis <strong>in</strong> each specific area where <strong>in</strong>vestments/concessions are planned.<br />
Bruce <strong>and</strong> Kanneh (2011) advise the GOL to consider a new Public <strong>L<strong>and</strong></strong> Law that “def<strong>in</strong>es public l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
clearly dist<strong>in</strong>guishes between public l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> held by local communities under customary l<strong>and</strong> tenure.”<br />
Reforms to the Public <strong>L<strong>and</strong></strong> Law could be coupled by a Community Rights Law that would substantially<br />
replace the H<strong>in</strong>terl<strong>and</strong>s Rules <strong>and</strong> Regulations <strong>and</strong> the Aborig<strong>in</strong>es Law – if the latter is even still <strong>in</strong> effect. By<br />
draw<strong>in</strong>g on the positive elements of these laws while abrogat<strong>in</strong>g the archaic, contradictory elements that<br />
<strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>ge on Community <strong>L<strong>and</strong></strong> rights, a Community Rights Law would provide explicit recognition of customary<br />
l<strong>and</strong> rights as perpetual, heritable rights subject to the same legal protections as fee simple tenure, though not<br />
necessarily <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g rights of transfer <strong>and</strong> mortgage. Such a law might also def<strong>in</strong>e Tribal Reserve (first<br />
articulated, but never def<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>in</strong> the H<strong>in</strong>terl<strong>and</strong>s Law) as l<strong>and</strong> available for communities to exert collective,<br />
perpetual, heritable rights to l<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> accordance with custom, <strong>and</strong> which is <strong>in</strong>alienable unless removed by a<br />
member of the claimant community via a locally prescribed process to convert it to <strong>in</strong>dividualized fee simple<br />
tenure.<br />
To maximize capture of all or most l<strong>and</strong> currently governed under customary tenure systems, Community <strong>L<strong>and</strong></strong><br />
could potentially apply to all l<strong>and</strong> fall<strong>in</strong>g outside designated urban zones that is currently not secured by a<br />
legitimately acquired fee simple deed or government claim (e.g., park, public university, military <strong>in</strong>stallation,<br />
roads, port) <strong>and</strong> not presently encumbered by an exist<strong>in</strong>g leasehold or concession granted by the government.<br />
Community <strong>L<strong>and</strong></strong> would therefore be excluded from the public l<strong>and</strong> realm, mak<strong>in</strong>g it not only <strong>in</strong>eligible for<br />
public l<strong>and</strong> sale, but also temper<strong>in</strong>g the practice of government grant<strong>in</strong>g concessions without regard to<br />
whether the l<strong>and</strong> is under customary claim(s). Clearly, special provisions would need to be made for exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
leases <strong>and</strong> concessions on l<strong>and</strong> that would otherwise fall under Community <strong>L<strong>and</strong></strong> to ensure that current<br />
beneficiaries be allowed to reta<strong>in</strong> rights under exist<strong>in</strong>g contractual terms. However, upon the date of contract<br />
expiry, such l<strong>and</strong> could become automatically designated as Community <strong>L<strong>and</strong></strong>, provid<strong>in</strong>g local communities an<br />
opportunity to exert customary claims.<br />
10.2 DOCUMENTATION OF CUSTOMARY RIGTHS<br />
In order to equip communities with the means to safeguard their customary l<strong>and</strong> rights, we recommend that<br />
the GOL issue documentation that vests those rights <strong>in</strong> communities, not <strong>in</strong>dividuals. Such documentation<br />
would vest <strong>in</strong> communities rights on par with those guaranteed under fee simple tenures, m<strong>in</strong>us the right of<br />
alienation. It is clear from the customary l<strong>and</strong> tenure research described <strong>in</strong> this report <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> other research<br />
carried out <strong>in</strong> rural <strong>Liberia</strong> that group tenure based on patril<strong>in</strong>eal <strong>and</strong> other community affiliations form the<br />
foundation on which customary l<strong>and</strong> tenure systems <strong>in</strong> rural <strong>Liberia</strong> function. While war, economic<br />
opportunity, <strong>and</strong> the imposition of statutory law <strong>and</strong> authority structures have taken a toll on compliance with<br />
customary law, by <strong>and</strong> large these systems cont<strong>in</strong>ue to comm<strong>and</strong> strong social legitimacy <strong>and</strong>, for most rural<br />
communities, are the only tenure systems that truly govern how people access <strong>and</strong> use l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> natural<br />
resources. For these reasons, we recommend that the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal basis for documentation of customary tenure<br />
should be the unit with<strong>in</strong> which primary rights to access l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> natural resources are acquired <strong>and</strong> where<br />
the ma<strong>in</strong> locus of l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> resource governance is housed – the core tenure unit. This would provide the<br />
necessary flexibility to vest <strong>and</strong> document rights <strong>in</strong> towns, quarters, extended families, or other communal<br />
structures based on what local communities identify to be socially legitimate.<br />
The mechanics of how those l<strong>and</strong> rights should be documented is complex given that <strong>Liberia</strong> not only has a<br />
long history of record<strong>in</strong>g rights <strong>in</strong> the form of deeds, but also has law on its books govern<strong>in</strong>g title registration<br />
<strong>and</strong> may eventually move toward replac<strong>in</strong>g deeds with a title registration system. Laws govern<strong>in</strong>g both deed<br />
registration <strong>and</strong> title registration allow for the registration of rights vested <strong>in</strong> groups. However, the systems<br />
are cumbersome <strong>and</strong> costly, <strong>and</strong> – at least for deeds – have proven to be out of reach for most rural<br />
CUSTOMARY LAND TENURE IN LIBERIA