02.02.2015 Views

of the Verde Island Passage, Philippines - weADAPT

of the Verde Island Passage, Philippines - weADAPT

of the Verde Island Passage, Philippines - weADAPT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

chapter 1 • vulnerability assessment <strong>of</strong> marine ecosystems and fisheries to climate change: sensitivity<br />

curve was used since it is <strong>the</strong> only published account<br />

available for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Philippines</strong>. However, <strong>the</strong> estimates<br />

computed from <strong>the</strong>se are considered conservative<br />

because <strong>the</strong> Veron and Fenner’s curve is based<br />

on beta/between-reef diversity while <strong>the</strong> current<br />

application is seeks to estimate changes in alpha/<br />

within-reef diversity. The latter is typically much higher<br />

locally.<br />

Coral diversity loss due to sea surface temperature<br />

increase was estimated by obtaining <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

coral genera that will be lost by removing <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmally<br />

sensitive coral genera listed in Pratchett et al. (2008)<br />

(Table 8). Lower range estimates were obtained by<br />

removing <strong>the</strong> top 10 most vulnerable genera from <strong>the</strong><br />

total genera present per municipality. Whereas, higher<br />

range estimates were calculated by removing all <strong>the</strong><br />

vulnerable coral genera based on <strong>the</strong> list to <strong>the</strong> total<br />

genera present in each municipality. This decision is<br />

arbitrary since, again, no dose-response curve for coral<br />

communities and bleaching is available and thus we<br />

based <strong>the</strong> cut-<strong>of</strong>f on observations <strong>of</strong> vulnerable taxa<br />

made in western Batangas during <strong>the</strong> 1998 bleaching<br />

event, apparently <strong>the</strong> worst one for <strong>the</strong> VIP (Arceo et<br />

al. 2001). The estimates based on projected cover<br />

loss and <strong>the</strong> species-area curve served as <strong>the</strong> lower<br />

range estimates <strong>of</strong> diversity loss, whereas <strong>the</strong> direct<br />

vulnerabilities served as <strong>the</strong> higher range estimates.<br />

Table 8. Coral genera <strong>the</strong>rmally sensitive to bleaching events.<br />

Acropora sp.<br />

Stylophora sp.<br />

Mycedium sp.<br />

Isopora sp.<br />

Montastrea sp.<br />

Hydnophora sp.<br />

Coeloseris sp.<br />

Cyphastrea sp.<br />

Pocillopora sp.<br />

Montipora sp.<br />

Source: Pratchett et al. 2008.<br />

Leptoria sp.<br />

Echinophyllia sp.<br />

Lobophyllia sp.<br />

Acanthastrea sp.<br />

Goniopora sp.<br />

Pectinia sp.<br />

Galaxea sp.<br />

Goniastrea sp.<br />

Seriatopora sp.<br />

Porites sp.<br />

Favia sp.<br />

Echinopora sp.<br />

Favites sp.<br />

Pavona sp.<br />

Merulina sp.<br />

Turbinaria sp.<br />

Astreopora sp.<br />

The assumptions <strong>of</strong> Pratchett et al. (2008) were based<br />

on <strong>the</strong> numerous studies on <strong>the</strong> hierarchy <strong>of</strong> bleaching<br />

susceptibilities <strong>of</strong> coral genera. Impacts <strong>of</strong> climateinduced<br />

coral bleaching are less selective compared<br />

to increased storminess and Acanthaster planci outbreaks.<br />

Thermal sensitivities <strong>of</strong> coral genera have<br />

been attributed to physiological and morphological<br />

attributes such as colony integration, tissue thickness<br />

and sensitivities <strong>of</strong> symbiotic zooxan<strong>the</strong>llae. Moreover,<br />

differences in depth and habitats, history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

stresses and hydrodynamics also play crucial roles in<br />

coral bleaching susceptibility.<br />

Seagrass and mangrove<br />

The sensitivity assessment <strong>of</strong> mangrove and seagrass<br />

areas surrounding <strong>the</strong> VIP was conducted using<br />

available secondary information from municipal<br />

and provincial agriculture <strong>of</strong>fices, coastal resource<br />

management plans and assessment reports from<br />

various institutions. Using <strong>the</strong> most relevant information,<br />

<strong>the</strong> status and sensitivity <strong>of</strong> mangroves and seagrasses<br />

to climate change were assessed based on likely<br />

response to <strong>the</strong> climate change component that will<br />

have greatest impact on <strong>the</strong>se ecosystems. In particular,<br />

mangroves’ sensitivity to increasing sea level rise was<br />

assessed based on <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> flooding and <strong>the</strong> most<br />

available areas for recruitment and settlement. The<br />

vulnerability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se areas was assessed using McLeod<br />

and Salm (2006) vulnerability conditions (Table 9).<br />

Seagrass’ sensitivity and vulnerability to increasing sea<br />

surface temperature and storm frequency and intensity<br />

were assessed using information from Campbell et al.<br />

(2006), Duarte et al. (1997), and Terrados et al. (1998).<br />

In particular, seagrass response to <strong>the</strong>rmal stress,<br />

sediment perturbation, and eutrophication were given<br />

emphasis to assess <strong>the</strong> vulnerability <strong>of</strong> this ecosystem<br />

to climate change. However, since <strong>the</strong> available data<br />

did not include information on <strong>the</strong> zonation <strong>of</strong> species<br />

within a meadow, <strong>the</strong> sensitivity assessment was<br />

species-specific.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!