3rd Interim report September 2011- March 2012.pdf - Renanetwork.org

More documents

Recommendations

Info

“Regional Environmental Network for Accession” Ref: EuropeAid/128906/C/SER/Multi Participants didn’t have any comments on the content of 5 th and 6 th training. After some discussion venue and dates for the future workshops were agreed, as presented in the table above. Ms. Semėnienė reminded that during the 4 th workshop draft Checklist on Major Steps to be Taken During the Cross-border Coordination of Good Water Status Criteria and Monitoring would be provided and discussed. In the 5 th workshop draft Guidelines on the Major Steps Required to Develop Cost-effective Programme of Measures will be discussed. Discussion on the future RENA 2. Ms. Madalina Ivanica shortly introduced idea of RENA 2 and noted that EC was keen to continue RENA project activities in Balkan countries and Turkey as positive effects could be seen. Currently discussions on the follow up actions are ongoing and main issues and topics have to be identified in the coming months. It will be rather important that any follow up actions are designed in accordance to the needs of the beneficiaries. RENA 2 will still remain capacity building project, but will be more practically oriented and will have more tangible results. One example could be support in preparation of real transboundary RBMPs in accordance with the WFD. Ms. Ivanica reminded that all ideas should have regional character. Ms. Ivanica invited participants to present their needs for future RENA 2 activities either during this annual meeting or to discuss with colleague at home and to send information within two weeks. Ms. Semėnienė mentioned that coordination of international RBMPs and/or implementation measures among countries is very important. New RENA project could involve similar kind of activities, such as periodical meetings among responsible institutions of neighbouring countries. Mr. Stephan von Keitz noted that in some countries RBMPs are carried out by consultants and idea would be to look “over the shoulder”, i.e. to have “on-site and hands-on" training from those who are preparing or have prepared these Plans. Thus, exchange of experience and a practical touch of things, which are already elaborated, would be a useful thing to do. Ms. Semėnienė proposed support in implementation of new water sector directives, such as Floods, Marine Directives etc. Study tours to specific sites would be a very helpful instruments for future RENA countries. Mr. Simonas Valatka offered an idea to support coordination of monitoring process among several countries in order to have common understanding on monitoring and different parameters and to share the knowledge afterwards, as well as to compare the results while using different methods. Ms. Viola Saliaga proposed study tours to other countries with small real assignments. Ms. Dragana Milovanović (Serbia) asked for a support in funding participation in regular meetings, related to bilateral and multilateral agreements etc. Ms. Ljupka Dimovska Zajkov (Macedonia) asked for support and training on how to use and work with the WISE. It was agreed that participants would discuss more with their colleagues at home and send ideas to Ms. Daiva Semėnienė within two weeks. Page4 This Project is funded by the European Union A project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium
“Regional Environmental Network for Accession” Ref: EuropeAid/128906/C/SER/Multi 2 nd Minutes of the Meeting Annual Meeting of WG 3 EIA/SEA Sub-group Regional Environmental Network for Accession (RENA) Date: Participants: Beneficiaries 10 November <strong>2011</strong>, Dubrovnik, Croatia Ms. Jasmina Katica - Federal Ministry of Spatial Planning Ms. Ana Kovacevic - Ministry of Environmental Protection, Physical Planning and Construction Ms. Anamarija Matak - Ministry of Environmental Protection, Physical Planning and Construction Mr. Zoran Bosev - Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning Ms. Saska Brblic - Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning Mr. Biljana Spiroska - Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning Mr. Ismail Hetemaj - Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning Mr. Shukri Shabani - Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning Mr. Enver Tahiri - Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning Ms. Brankica Cmiljanović, Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism Mr. Slobodan Sremcevic, Ministry of Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning Ms. Deniz Asik Yilmaz - Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs, Turkey European Union • Ms. Madalina Ivanica, RENA Task Manager, DG Environment, European Commission Project Team • Ms. Daiva Semėnienė Key expert 3/ WG 3 SEA/EIA Sub-group Leader • Mr. Martin Smutny ST expert/WG 3 SEA/EIA • Ms. Simona Daugintienė Junior expert/ WG 3 SEA/EIA Page1 This Project is funded by the European Union A project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium
Page 1 and 2:
The European Union’s Instrument f
Page 3 and 4:
Interim Report, No 3, 19 September
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68: Interim Report, No 3, 19 September
Page 75 and 76: Estimated number of working days pe
Page 85 and 86: “Regional Environmental Network f
Page 93 and 94: Human Dynamics Consortium 3 rd Inte
Page 103 and 104: 2 nd “Regional Environmental Netw
Page 109 and 110: IPA 2011- 2013 Environment and Clim
Page 111 and 112: 2 st “Regional Environmental Netw
Page 117: “Regional Environmental Network f
Page 129: “Regional Environmental Network f
show all

3rd Interim report September 2011- March 2012.pdf - Renanetwork.org

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?