3rd Interim report September 2011- March 2012.pdf - Renanetwork.org

Interim Report, No 3, 19 September 2011 – 18 March 2012
Activity 3.3 EIA and SEA
Activity 3.4 Multilateral Environmental Agreements –
gap assessments
Activity 4.1 Capacity building regarding compliance
with environmental legislation through better
understanding of issues and identification of targeted
solutions
Activity 4.2 Country external assessments
Activity4.3 EU ETS Compliance
Activity 4.4 Transfrontier Shipment of Waste
Activity 4.5 Inspection and enforcement in cross border
nature protection areas
Activity 4.6 ECENA participation in relevant
networking activities including IMPEL and other sister
networks
Key Expert 4: 0 wds
Senior Non Key Experts: 430 wds
Junior Non-Key Experts: tbd
Incidentals: 430.827 euro
WG 2: Climate Change
Team Leader: 61 wds
Key Expert 2: 0 wds
Key Expert 3: 0 wds
Key Expert 4: 120 wds
Senior Non Key Experts: 190 wds
Junior Non-Key Experts: tbd
Incidentals: 334.687 euro
WG 3: Cross border cooperation
Team Leader: 20 wds
Key Expert 2: 30 wds
Key Expert 3: 150 wds
Key Expert 4: 55 wds
Senior Non Key Experts: 180 wds
Junior Non-Key Experts: tbd
Incidentals: 504.087 euro
WG 4: ECENA
Team Leader: 113 wds
Key Expert 2: 30 wds
Key Expert 3: 0 wds
Key Expert 4: 75 wds
Senior Non Key Experts: 140 wds
Junior Non-Key Experts: tbd
Incidentals: 490.124 euro
Final phase
Team Leader: 20 wds
Key Expert 2: 10 wds
Key Expert 3: 10 wds
steps forward will be made.
Cooperation and data availability and the
timely access to these data are highly
important to proceed with network
activities according to planning and to
provide quality outputs. These elements
will definitely impact the usefulness of the
project report results and the benefit all
stakeholders can have from it.
Many activities are planned in RENA. The
allocation of staff and resources to
participate in the events may be a bit
difficult in a number of cases. Not only in
terms of quantity, also in terms of quality.
This may mainly refer to representatives of
public administrations (many countries
having limited experienced senior
resources) and civil society organisations.
The efficiency and effectiveness of the
knowledge transfer in the workshops and
events will highly depend on this aspect.
Proper project implementation is served
with a stable environment. Continuity will
be an important aspect in building up
ownership and the use of the project
results. Since the project deals with
countries that have so far shown regular
political and administrative alterations it is
likely that in some of them relevant changes
potentially impacting project results will
take place
Human Dynamics Consortium 8