3rd Interim report September 2011- March 2012.pdf - Renanetwork.org

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Interim Report, No 3, 19 September 2011 – 18 March 2012 IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITIES Activity 1.1 Overview report on approximation in SEE Activity 1.2 RISP – Regional Institutional Support Platform Activity 1.3 Investment Planning Activity 1.4 Public participation in planning Activity 1.5 Progress monitoring Activity 1.6 Gap assessments of draft legal acts Activity 2.1 ReCAP Activity 2.2 GHG Reporting Activity 2.3 EU-ETS Activity 3.1 Nature Protection Activity 3.2 Water Management monitoring and reporting, focussing specifically on the issues of permitting, inspection and enforcement • EU-ETS compliance: One 2-day regional training workshop with participation of neighboring countries representatives (for example Bulgaria and Romania) • TFS: Two 2-day regional training workshops with participation of neighboring countries representatives (for example Bulgaria and Romania) • Cross border nature protection: Two 2-day regional training workshop with participation of neighboring countries representatives • ECENA participation in networks: Three annual meetings of the ECENA Working Group; Participation in about 5 events per year (as average) of inspectors/permit writers from the region in other sister networks MEANS Country coordinators+PR/Visibility Junior Non-Key Experts: 900 wd – (800 + 100 wds) Inception Team Leader: 60 wds Key Expert 2: 40 wds Key Expert 3: 40 wds Key Expert 4: 40 wds WG 1 Strategic Planning and Investments: Team Leader: 26 wds Key Expert 2: 190 wds Key Expert 3: 100 wds CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE SUCCESS Given the RENA history so far political support from the side of Environment Ministers seems evident, being a first precondition for successful RENA cooperation. Commitment to work with the project results will however be equally important. Reports may be nice for the record, they are much nicer if they are not just a piece of output, but generate actual outcomes. As it seems the commitment to be involved is rather strong in the beneficiary countries giving good hope that Human Dynamics Consortium 7
Interim Report, No 3, 19 September 2011 – 18 March 2012 Activity 3.3 EIA and SEA Activity 3.4 Multilateral Environmental Agreements – gap assessments Activity 4.1 Capacity building regarding compliance with environmental legislation through better understanding of issues and identification of targeted solutions Activity 4.2 Country external assessments Activity4.3 EU ETS Compliance Activity 4.4 Transfrontier Shipment of Waste Activity 4.5 Inspection and enforcement in cross border nature protection areas Activity 4.6 ECENA participation in relevant networking activities including IMPEL and other sister networks Key Expert 4: 0 wds Senior Non Key Experts: 430 wds Junior Non-Key Experts: tbd Incidentals: 430.827 euro WG 2: Climate Change Team Leader: 61 wds Key Expert 2: 0 wds Key Expert 3: 0 wds Key Expert 4: 120 wds Senior Non Key Experts: 190 wds Junior Non-Key Experts: tbd Incidentals: 334.687 euro WG 3: Cross border cooperation Team Leader: 20 wds Key Expert 2: 30 wds Key Expert 3: 150 wds Key Expert 4: 55 wds Senior Non Key Experts: 180 wds Junior Non-Key Experts: tbd Incidentals: 504.087 euro WG 4: ECENA Team Leader: 113 wds Key Expert 2: 30 wds Key Expert 3: 0 wds Key Expert 4: 75 wds Senior Non Key Experts: 140 wds Junior Non-Key Experts: tbd Incidentals: 490.124 euro Final phase Team Leader: 20 wds Key Expert 2: 10 wds Key Expert 3: 10 wds steps forward will be made. Cooperation and data availability and the timely access to these data are highly important to proceed with network activities according to planning and to provide quality outputs. These elements will definitely impact the usefulness of the project report results and the benefit all stakeholders can have from it. Many activities are planned in RENA. The allocation of staff and resources to participate in the events may be a bit difficult in a number of cases. Not only in terms of quantity, also in terms of quality. This may mainly refer to representatives of public administrations (many countries having limited experienced senior resources) and civil society organisations. The efficiency and effectiveness of the knowledge transfer in the workshops and events will highly depend on this aspect. Proper project implementation is served with a stable environment. Continuity will be an important aspect in building up ownership and the use of the project results. Since the project deals with countries that have so far shown regular political and administrative alterations it is likely that in some of them relevant changes potentially impacting project results will take place Human Dynamics Consortium 8
Page 1 and 2:
The European Union’s Instrument f
Page 3 and 4:
Interim Report, No 3, 19 September
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32: Interim Report, No 3, 19 September
Page 75 and 76: Estimated number of working days pe
Page 81: Interim Report, No 3, 19 September
Page 85 and 86: “Regional Environmental Network f
Page 93 and 94: Human Dynamics Consortium 3 rd Inte
Page 103 and 104: 2 nd “Regional Environmental Netw
Page 109 and 110: IPA 2011- 2013 Environment and Clim
Page 111 and 112: 2 st “Regional Environmental Netw
Page 129: “Regional Environmental Network f
show all

3rd Interim report September 2011- March 2012.pdf - Renanetwork.org

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?