03.03.2015 Views

Food & Nutrition

Food & Nutrition

Food & Nutrition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Arab Journal of <strong>Food</strong> & <strong>Nutrition</strong><br />

62. Comparison of Growth and Protein Quality of a Group of Infant-Feeding<br />

Formulas in Rats (2003)<br />

Mohannad Abdel-Qader Al-Sha’ar\ University of Jordan<br />

Supervisor: Dr. Hamed R. Takruri<br />

This study was conducted to investigate the nutritive value of different milkbased<br />

infant formulas marketed in Jordan, it included those with added LCPUFAs and<br />

nucleotides “A1”, nucleotides “A2”, LCPUFAs “B1”, two brands free of LCPUFAs<br />

and nucleotides “B2” and “C1” and a brand containing nucleotides but with low<br />

protein content “C2”). The nutritive value was evaluated through proximate analysis,<br />

studying protein quality, growth and iron status of rats fed these formulas.<br />

Forty-two weanling Sprague-Dawely rats were divided into 7 groups, each group<br />

containing 6 animals. <strong>Food</strong> and water were introduced to animals ad libitum and the<br />

experiment was conducted in duplicate. <strong>Food</strong> consumption, weight gain, liver weight,<br />

food efficiency ratio (FER) and protein efficiency ratio (PER) values were the<br />

biological indices used, whereas SFe, TIBC and Hb concentration values were used for<br />

the evaluation of iron status.<br />

The results showed that the infant formulas studied varied in their proximate<br />

analysis, but they were still within the related Jordanian Specification. Weight gain<br />

and liver weight values in rats fed infant formulas B1 or C1 were comparable to those<br />

fed casein diet, but were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those fed infant formulas<br />

A1, A2 or C2. Protein efficiency ratio values for casein diet and for infant formulas<br />

B1, B2 and C1 were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those of infant formulas A1,<br />

A2 and C2. <strong>Food</strong> efficiency ratio values for casein diet and for infant formulas B1, B2<br />

and C1 were also significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those of infant formulas A2 and<br />

C2. There were no large differences in SFe, TIBC and Hb concentration among rats<br />

fed different infant formulas.<br />

The addition of sources of sugar other than lactose to infant formulas had a<br />

remarkable influence in improving food consumption, weight gain, liver weight, FER<br />

and PER. The presence of taurine in infant formulas had a substantial influence in<br />

improving protein quality (PER). The addition of nucleotides and / or LCPUFAs to<br />

infant formulas had low effects on SFe, TIBC, and Hb concentration.<br />

224<br />

Volume 11, No. 25, 2011<br />

225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!