Food & Nutrition
Food & Nutrition
Food & Nutrition
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Arab Journal of <strong>Food</strong> & <strong>Nutrition</strong><br />
114. Effect of Dietary Chitosan Fiber on Body Composition, Fat Deposition, and<br />
Energy Balance in Rats Fed High-Fat Diets (2010)<br />
Nada Mufid Abu – Kishk\ University of Jordan<br />
Supervisor: Dr. Mousa Numan Ahmad<br />
This study was carried out to investigate whether or not chitosan fiber<br />
incorporated in the diet had an effect on food intake, water intake, body weight, food<br />
efficiency, fat deposition and whole body energy balance in rats fed high fat diet for<br />
seven weeks. The effect of silica incorporation with chitosan in the diet on the above<br />
mentioned variables was also investigated. Forty – five male Sprague – Dawley rats<br />
(280 20 g weight) were used. Five rats were sacrificed at the beginning of the study,<br />
for determination of body composition and energy content whereas the remaining forty<br />
rats were divided into eight groups (5 rats / group). Each group was fed a diet<br />
containing 0 % chitosan or silica, 10 % chitosan, 10 % silica and 10 % chitosan +<br />
silica in either normal fat (NF) or high fat (HF) diets. NF diets contained 4 % soybean<br />
oil, whereas HF diet contained 4 % soybean oil + 24 % sheep tallow. Feces of each rat<br />
were collected during the fourth and seventh weeks of this study for fat %<br />
determination. At the end of feeding period, rats were fasted overnight, sacrificed and<br />
analyzed for body composition and energy content.<br />
The results of this study indicated that, compared to HF diets, feeding chitosan<br />
diet with NF diet caused no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the final body weight<br />
(361.4 10.06 g vs. 376.8 12.45 g), weight gain (82.36 ± 14.14 g vs. 90.36 ± 2.19),<br />
accumulative water intake (1326.4 32.4 ml vs. 1236 60.44 ml), and food efficiency<br />
ratio (10.16 1.91 vs. 12.26 0.44). Accumulative food intake of rats fed chitosan<br />
diet with NF was significantly (818.56 23.56 g) higher than the similar group fed HF<br />
diet (739.08 16.95 g). Compared to HF diets, rats fed chitosan diet with NF diet<br />
showed significant (p < 0.05) decrease in body fat content (9.12 0.49 % vs. 12.35 <br />
0.45 %), body energy fat % (43.15 1.97 % vs. 51.48 0.91 %), final body energy<br />
(712.81 19.41 kcal vs. 840.71 32.87 kcal), and body energy gain (180.89 19.38<br />
kcal vs. 308.50 32.93 kcal), with corresponding decreases, in metabolizable energy<br />
intake (ME) (2945.18 84.77 kcal vs. 3402.93 84.77 kcal), energy expenditure (EE)<br />
(2764.28 74.81 vs. 3237.60 99.69 kcal), and energetic efficiency (6.53 0.64 %<br />
vs. 8.63 0.79). Rats fed chitosan diet with NF showed a significant (p < 0.05)<br />
decrease in the change of body fat content (1.14 0.49 % vs. 3.15 0.32 %, 4.54 <br />
0.46 %, 3.13 0.25 %, 4.31 0.06 %, 4.31 0.32 %, 4.37 0.65 %, respectively),<br />
and the % of body energy fat gain (3.41 0.5 % vs. 5.78 0.44 %, 7.74 0.75 %,<br />
6.11 0.24 %, 6.11 0.24 %, 6.97 0.13 %, 6.43 0.71 %, 6.82 0.68 % and 16<br />
0.96 %, respectively), compared to all treatment groups (0 % chitosan or silica NF<br />
or silica NF, 10 % silica NF, 10 % chitosan + silica NF, 0 % chitosan or silica HF, 10<br />
% chitosan HF, 10 % silica HF and 10 % chitosan + silica HF, respectively).<br />
Volume 11, No. 25, 2011<br />
298<br />
299