Contractors' Questionnaire - Construction Owners Association of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

K3. Project Schedule Control 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ K4. Risk Management 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ K5. Safety Procedures 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ L. Project Execution Plan (1) Complete Poor (5) L1. Project Organization 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ L2. Owner Approval Requirements 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ L3. Project Delivery Method 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ L4. Design/Construction Plan & Approach 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ L5. Substantial Completion Requirements 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ 64
5.1.2. Full Industrial PDRI Was a Front End Loading Index used to determine the quality of Front End Planning for this project? (Includes PDRI, FEL, or an in-house developed system.) Yes ◘ No ◘ Was the Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) utilized on this project? Yes ◘ No ◘ Please complete the following matrix using the appropriate definition levels given below. Indicate how well defined each element was prior to the total Contract Awarded by selecting the appropriate definition level. 1. Complete definition 2. Minor deficiencies 3. Some deficiencies 4. Major deficiencies 5. Incomplete or poor definition 6. Not Applicable 7. Unknown Note: If this is an infrastructure project some of the following elements may not apply to your project. Please fill in "Not Applicable" to indicate if any element does not apply to your project. Italicized questions will be scored for your Front End Planning Score Industrial PDRI Definition Level at Authorization A. Manufacturing Objectives Criteria (1) Complete Poor (5) A1. Reliability Philosophy 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ A2. Maintenance Philosophy 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ A3. Operating Philosophy 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ B. Business Objectives (1) Complete Poor (5) B1. Products 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ B2. Market Strategy 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ B3. Project Strategy 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ B4. Affordability/Feasibility 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ B5. Capacities 1 2 3 4 5 NA UNK ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ 65
Page 1:
COAA Contractor Questionnaire Versi
Page 4 and 5:
Heavy Industrial Cogeneration Pulp
Page 6 and 7:
1.4 Project Delivery System Please
Page 8 and 9:
1.7 Project Scope Please provide a
Page 10 and 11:
Functions Your Company Self Perform
Page 12 and 13:
2. Performance 2.1 Budgeted and Act
Page 14 and 15:
Bulk Material Bulk materials are ge
Page 16 and 17: 2.2 Planned and Actual Project Sche
Page 18 and 19: 2.4 Field Rework Was there a system
Page 20 and 21: 3.1 Concrete Instructions Please co
Page 22 and 23: 3.2 Structural Steel Instructions P
Page 24 and 25: 3.3 Electrical Instructions Please
Page 26 and 27: 3.4 Piping Instructions Please comp
Page 28 and 29: 3.6 Equipment Instructions Please c
Page 30 and 31: Vendor-Designed Modules & Pre- Asse
Page 32 and 33: 4.1 Concrete Instructions Please pr
Page 34 and 35: Total Concrete None Quantity (CM) E
Page 36 and 37: Structural Steel Structural Steel N
Page 38 and 39: Electrical Equipment and Devices Pa
Page 40 and 41: Instructions for calculation of Wei
Page 42 and 43: Other Electrical Lighting Fixtures
Page 44 and 45: Instructions for calculation of Sma
Page 46 and 47: Outside Battery Limits (OSBL) Large
Page 48 and 49: 4.6 Equipment Instructions Please p
Page 50 and 51: Estimated Productivity Atmospheric
Page 52 and 53: Material Handling Equipment (w/driv
Page 54 and 55: 4.7 Insulation Instructions Please
Page 56 and 57: 4.8 Module Installation Instruction
Page 58 and 59: 4.9 Scaffolding Instructions Please
Page 60 and 61: 5. Practices 5.1 Front End Planning
Page 62 and 63: 5.1.1. Full Building PDRI Was a Fro
Page 64 and 65: D6. Utility Sources with Supply Con
Page 68 and 69: B6. Future Expansion Considerations
Page 70 and 71: H. Equipment Scope (1) Complete Poo
Page 72 and 73: Please evaluate the overall effecti
Page 74 and 75: 7. Was a comprehensive risk assessm
Page 76 and 77: 6. To what extent were new team mem
Page 78 and 79: 6. How effective were team meetings
Page 80 and 81: 6. To what extent was computerized
Page 82 and 83: 5. Which of the following best desc
Page 84 and 85: 5. How extensively was an automated
Page 86 and 87: 5.8 Project Change Management Chang
Page 88 and 89: 11. Did project personnel settle, a
Page 90 and 91: 7. Overall how many workers per saf
Page 92 and 93: 5.10 Quality Management Quality Man
Page 94 and 95: 11. Does the QA/QC manager for this
Page 96 and 97: 5.11 Automation/Integration (AI) Te
Page 98 and 99: Please evaluate the overall effecti
Page 100 and 101: 6. To what extent was the startup s
Page 102 and 103: 5.13 Prefabrication/ Preassembly/ M
Page 104 and 105: 6.2 Work- hours and Accident Data T
Page 106 and 107: 6.2.2. Subcontractor Employees Plea
Page 108 and 109: Project Complexity ◘ N/A ◘ UNK
Page 110 and 111: Business Market Conditions ◘ N/A
Page 112: c) Worker accommodations Indicate b
show all

Contractors' Questionnaire - Construction Owners Association of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?