26.06.2015 Views

new characteristics of inequalities in the information society and ...

new characteristics of inequalities in the information society and ...

new characteristics of inequalities in the information society and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ISSN: 2247-6172;<br />

ISSN-L: 2247-6172<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> Applied Socio- Economic Research<br />

(Volume 5, Issue 1/ 2013 ), pp. 145<br />

URL: http://www.reaser.eu<br />

e-mail: editors@reaser.eu<br />

cooperation br<strong>in</strong>gs significant value quantifiable <strong>in</strong> monetary terms to both parties (Chlebovský, 2005,<br />

str.23).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to many authors deal<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> CRM <strong>the</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> this term stabilized <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess strategy <strong>of</strong> choice <strong>and</strong> management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most valuable relationships with customers.<br />

„CRM is thus a bus<strong>in</strong>ess philosophy <strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess culture focused on customer that supports effective<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g, bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong> servic<strong>in</strong>g processes. CRM is a way how <strong>the</strong> company deals with its customers, what<br />

relations it keeps with <strong>the</strong>m <strong>and</strong> how it uses <strong>the</strong>se relations to mutual benefit.“ (Storbacka, Leht<strong>in</strong>en, 2002, s.<br />

16).<br />

3. Measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> level <strong>and</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> CRM. Introduction<br />

The best way to f<strong>in</strong>d out how big <strong>the</strong> contribution <strong>and</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> CRM is for <strong>the</strong> company is by <strong>the</strong><br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> level <strong>and</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> CRM. There are a number <strong>of</strong> methods used for measurement<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> level <strong>and</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> CRM <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> / for satisfy<strong>in</strong>g customer needs. An example <strong>of</strong> this can be CRM<br />

– Body Check, CRM Scorecard, CRM Maturity Model, Method <strong>of</strong> qualification <strong>of</strong> development abilities,<br />

CRACK Model <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m are built on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> sophisticated questionnaire structures <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir subsequent objective assessment.<br />

If we want to create a methodology for measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> CRM, we need to rely on a concept <strong>of</strong><br />

CRM oriented on <strong>the</strong> company strategy. It is almost impossible to reach a total generalization while add<strong>in</strong>g<br />

specific recommendation valid <strong>in</strong> optional ideal situation. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, it is possible to develop a basic<br />

design <strong>of</strong> a measurement system <strong>and</strong> methodology procedures which could be effectively adjusted to <strong>the</strong><br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> a given company.<br />

Chlebovský (2005, s. 135) alleges „number <strong>of</strong> companies state that <strong>the</strong>y carry <strong>the</strong> measurement <strong>of</strong><br />

performance <strong>of</strong> CRM. In fact <strong>the</strong>ir measurement is limited only to monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>new</strong>ly acquired<br />

contacts on potential customers, sale productivity, performance <strong>of</strong> call centers or alternatively <strong>the</strong>y rely on<br />

customers’ pr<strong>of</strong>itability. They <strong>of</strong>ten forget key factors which <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial results“.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> author gives a def<strong>in</strong>ition „<strong>the</strong> system <strong>of</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> CRM should connect<br />

long-term vision, strategy <strong>and</strong> goals <strong>in</strong> CRM with specific short-term tactical, action <strong>and</strong> evaluation plans<br />

creat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mov<strong>in</strong>g power <strong>of</strong> CRM.“<br />

4. Measurement <strong>and</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> CRM <strong>in</strong> a chosen furniture<br />

company<br />

4.1. Chosen method <strong>of</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>and</strong> level <strong>of</strong> CRM<br />

By <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual methods we came to <strong>the</strong> conclusion that it is important to def<strong>in</strong>e what<br />

variables <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sphere <strong>of</strong> management <strong>of</strong> customer relations <strong>the</strong> company wants to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

that it needs to decide what method it will use when measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> CRM. On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong><br />

carried out analysis <strong>and</strong> comparison <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle methods we decided to use for <strong>the</strong> measurement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> level<br />

<strong>and</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CRM <strong>the</strong> method CRACK which we applied on a chosen company <strong>and</strong> its key<br />

customers.<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> performance, use <strong>of</strong> CRM was divided <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>se ma<strong>in</strong> parts as follows:<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> monitored variables, criteria,<br />

calculation <strong>of</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual variables through Saaty matrix,<br />

assessment from <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company,<br />

calculation <strong>of</strong> complex <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> CRM,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!