10.07.2015 Views

Promoting IDPs' and Women's Voices in Post-Conflict Georgia

Promoting IDPs' and Women's Voices in Post-Conflict Georgia

Promoting IDPs' and Women's Voices in Post-Conflict Georgia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

exile seemed to represent a revanchist group that could pose a political threat to Abkhazia. 41 In manyways, the IDP community’s marg<strong>in</strong>alization <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong> results <strong>in</strong> the challenge of contribut<strong>in</strong>g morevaried <strong>and</strong> nuanced perspectives to both the formal peace process <strong>and</strong> more <strong>in</strong>formal peace build<strong>in</strong>gefforts with<strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Abkhazia, <strong>and</strong> South Ossetia.Women <strong>and</strong> Gender LegislationA cont<strong>in</strong>ued stream of legislation has been passed s<strong>in</strong>ce 2006 to address women’s issues <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>,reflect<strong>in</strong>g the perspective that <strong>Georgia</strong> seems to aspire towards gender equality. Reports have citeddifferences <strong>in</strong> approaches to these issues across the South Caucasus, with Armenia <strong>and</strong> Azerbaijan moreoriented towards traditional gender roles than <strong>Georgia</strong>. 42 However, several important issues rema<strong>in</strong>concern<strong>in</strong>g women’s empowerment. <strong>Georgia</strong> ranks 86 th out of 135 countries on the World EconomicForum’s Global Gender Gap <strong>in</strong>dex. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, Armenia <strong>and</strong> Azerbaijan have comparable rank<strong>in</strong>gs at84 th <strong>and</strong> 91 st place, respectively. <strong>Georgia</strong>’s rank<strong>in</strong>g has rema<strong>in</strong>ed stagnant s<strong>in</strong>ce 2006, with politicalempowerment <strong>and</strong> economic participation rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g virtually unchanged:Evolution of Key Gender Gap Sub Indexes 43Of particular significance to this report is <strong>Georgia</strong>’s low score on the political empowerment <strong>in</strong>dicator:only three of the 19 m<strong>in</strong>isters <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>’s government are female, <strong>and</strong> n<strong>in</strong>e of the 140 members ofparliament, while women hold under 11% of seats on local assemblies. These numbers amount to thelowest level of female participation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>n politics s<strong>in</strong>ce the country’s <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>in</strong> 1991. 44Women’s low political participation can be partially expla<strong>in</strong>ed by cultural gender stereotypes that placewomen <strong>and</strong> men <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> societal roles. More specifically, an Open Society <strong>Georgia</strong> study of publicvalues conducted <strong>in</strong> 2006 showed that <strong>Georgia</strong>n men <strong>and</strong> women do not view women as politicians. 45 In41 Ibid., 16.42 Caucasus Research Resource Center, “How Does the South Caucasus Compare?,” 5 October 2011. Web. 21 May 2012, 2.43 From the 2011 Global Gender Gap Report - <strong>Georgia</strong> Country Profile44 Shorana Latatia. Women Los<strong>in</strong>g Out <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>n Politics. Institute for War <strong>and</strong> Peace Report<strong>in</strong>g. 18 Mar. 2011. Web. 19 Nov.2011.45 Ibid.14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!