<strong>and</strong> the Guid<strong>in</strong>g Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, <strong>in</strong> February 2007, the <strong>Georgia</strong>n government approved the State Strategy forInternally Displaced Persons – Persecuted. In May 2010, it subsequently approved the Action Plan forthe Implementation of the State Strategy on IDPs dur<strong>in</strong>g 2009-2012.The State Strategy on IDPs <strong>and</strong> the Action Plan for the Implementation of the State Strategy serve as thebasis for the <strong>Georgia</strong>n government’s policies on IDPs. Before the draft<strong>in</strong>g of the State Strategy, therehad been no comprehensive approach to address<strong>in</strong>g IDPs’ specific rights <strong>and</strong> needs. In fact, prior toFebruary 2007, when the State Strategy on IDPs was adopted, the government actively worked aga<strong>in</strong>stIDPs’ <strong>in</strong>tegration, as their presence as <strong>in</strong>ternally displaced persons symbolized <strong>Georgia</strong>’s claim to thebreakaway territories of Abkhazia <strong>and</strong> South Ossetia.The State Strategy represents a paradigm shift <strong>in</strong> this discussion by counter<strong>in</strong>g the idea that return <strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>tegration are mutually exclusive. It outl<strong>in</strong>es two ma<strong>in</strong> goals: (i) “to create conditions for dignified <strong>and</strong>safe return of IDPs <strong>and</strong> to support IDPs who have spontaneously returned to their places of permanentresidence,” <strong>and</strong> (ii) “to support decent liv<strong>in</strong>g conditions for the displaced population <strong>and</strong> their<strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>in</strong> all aspects of society.” 38Regard<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>Georgia</strong>n government’s duties to its population to enable their participation, as a StateParty to the International Covenant on Civil <strong>and</strong> Political Rights, it is required under Article 25 to permitevery citizen, without unreasonable restrictions, the right <strong>and</strong> opportunity to: (i) “take part <strong>in</strong> theconduct of public affairs, directly or through freely chosen representatives,” (ii) “to vote <strong>and</strong> be electedat genu<strong>in</strong>e periodic elections which shall be by universal <strong>and</strong> equal suffrage <strong>and</strong> shall be held by secretballot, guarantee<strong>in</strong>g the free expression of the will of the electors,” <strong>and</strong> (iii) “To have access, on generalterms of equality, to public service <strong>in</strong> his country.” 39 As a State Party to the European Charter on HumanRights, Article 3, Protocol 1 also obligates the state to hold free elections.IDPs <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong> have an <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> political <strong>and</strong> civic affairs, especially because of thesupport they rely on from national authorities. Their needs <strong>in</strong>clude shelter, food, health care, <strong>and</strong>security. Women <strong>and</strong> children IDPs are vulnerable to abuse <strong>and</strong> sexual exploitation <strong>and</strong> particularly relyon authorities to provide security. More expansive IDP participation <strong>in</strong> elections will better address IDPneeds, <strong>and</strong> also opens up avenues to address societal <strong>in</strong>equities to promote reconciliation. The StateStrategy for IDPs recognizes the importance of IDPs’ election-related rights to help facilitate their<strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>in</strong>to <strong>Georgia</strong>n society. 40Particularly <strong>in</strong> the years follow<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial displacement <strong>in</strong> the early 1990s, <strong>Georgia</strong>n political forceshave attempted to use the IDP community as leverage <strong>in</strong> the peace process. The Abkhaz government-<strong>in</strong>-38 <strong>Georgia</strong>. Web. 30 Nov 2011.39 United Nations. International Covenant on Civil <strong>and</strong> Political Rights, Article 25, UN Doc. A/6316 (1966)40 Solomon, Andrew. “Election-Related Rights <strong>and</strong> Political Participation of Internally Displaced Persons: Protection Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>After Displacement <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong> Prepared by Andrew Solomon.” Brook<strong>in</strong>gs Institution, Nov. 2009: 1-3. Web. 28 Nov. 2011.13
exile seemed to represent a revanchist group that could pose a political threat to Abkhazia. 41 In manyways, the IDP community’s marg<strong>in</strong>alization <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong> results <strong>in</strong> the challenge of contribut<strong>in</strong>g morevaried <strong>and</strong> nuanced perspectives to both the formal peace process <strong>and</strong> more <strong>in</strong>formal peace build<strong>in</strong>gefforts with<strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Abkhazia, <strong>and</strong> South Ossetia.Women <strong>and</strong> Gender LegislationA cont<strong>in</strong>ued stream of legislation has been passed s<strong>in</strong>ce 2006 to address women’s issues <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>,reflect<strong>in</strong>g the perspective that <strong>Georgia</strong> seems to aspire towards gender equality. Reports have citeddifferences <strong>in</strong> approaches to these issues across the South Caucasus, with Armenia <strong>and</strong> Azerbaijan moreoriented towards traditional gender roles than <strong>Georgia</strong>. 42 However, several important issues rema<strong>in</strong>concern<strong>in</strong>g women’s empowerment. <strong>Georgia</strong> ranks 86 th out of 135 countries on the World EconomicForum’s Global Gender Gap <strong>in</strong>dex. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, Armenia <strong>and</strong> Azerbaijan have comparable rank<strong>in</strong>gs at84 th <strong>and</strong> 91 st place, respectively. <strong>Georgia</strong>’s rank<strong>in</strong>g has rema<strong>in</strong>ed stagnant s<strong>in</strong>ce 2006, with politicalempowerment <strong>and</strong> economic participation rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g virtually unchanged:Evolution of Key Gender Gap Sub Indexes 43Of particular significance to this report is <strong>Georgia</strong>’s low score on the political empowerment <strong>in</strong>dicator:only three of the 19 m<strong>in</strong>isters <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>’s government are female, <strong>and</strong> n<strong>in</strong>e of the 140 members ofparliament, while women hold under 11% of seats on local assemblies. These numbers amount to thelowest level of female participation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>n politics s<strong>in</strong>ce the country’s <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>in</strong> 1991. 44Women’s low political participation can be partially expla<strong>in</strong>ed by cultural gender stereotypes that placewomen <strong>and</strong> men <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> societal roles. More specifically, an Open Society <strong>Georgia</strong> study of publicvalues conducted <strong>in</strong> 2006 showed that <strong>Georgia</strong>n men <strong>and</strong> women do not view women as politicians. 45 In41 Ibid., 16.42 Caucasus Research Resource Center, “How Does the South Caucasus Compare?,” 5 October 2011. Web. 21 May 2012, 2.43 From the 2011 Global Gender Gap Report - <strong>Georgia</strong> Country Profile44 Shorana Latatia. Women Los<strong>in</strong>g Out <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>n Politics. Institute for War <strong>and</strong> Peace Report<strong>in</strong>g. 18 Mar. 2011. Web. 19 Nov.2011.45 Ibid.14
- Page 2 and 3: Promoting IDPs’ and Women’s Voi
- Page 4 and 5: CONTENTSAcronyms and Abbreviations
- Page 6 and 7: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYInternally displac
- Page 8 and 9: THE WOMEN’S POLITICAL RESOURCE CE
- Page 10 and 11: fair reporting on politically sensi
- Page 12 and 13: people-to-people diplomacy efforts
- Page 16 and 17: an effort to address these stereoty
- Page 18 and 19: The identities, perceptions, and re
- Page 20 and 21: even IDPs themselves. The HRBA seek
- Page 22 and 23: Karaleti settlement, and Potskho-Et
- Page 24 and 25: displacement differently, with men
- Page 26 and 27: on an equal footing with men in for
- Page 28 and 29: The Ministry for Internally Displac
- Page 30 and 31: Defender’s Office) and leave no r
- Page 32 and 33: prominent national level IDP NGO wo
- Page 34 and 35: in the past but none have yet to be
- Page 36 and 37: Grassroots Peacebuilding EffortsCiv
- Page 38 and 39: esettlement and local integration h
- Page 40 and 41: ability to contribute to the new Ac
- Page 42 and 43: Women convened a working group to a
- Page 44 and 45: were involved, in addition to “wo
- Page 46 and 47: towards addressing this population
- Page 48 and 49: waves. 224 A Conciliation Resources
- Page 50 and 51: governing shelter requirements. 238
- Page 52 and 53: esults of eviction on those who did
- Page 54 and 55: FINDINGSSIPA team member Drilon Gas
- Page 56 and 57: unique opportunities exist for them
- Page 58 and 59: an important opportunity for women
- Page 60 and 61: early morning…when I was going to
- Page 62 and 63: our office to investigate these iss
- Page 64 and 65:
on this? It’s impossible.” 322
- Page 66 and 67:
high levels of unemployment and pov
- Page 68 and 69:
groups do not differentiate between
- Page 70 and 71:
funding and influence to implement
- Page 72 and 73:
een in operation for two years or l
- Page 74 and 75:
organization, and highlighted that
- Page 76 and 77:
The Education System’s Influence
- Page 78 and 79:
system has an important role to pla
- Page 80 and 81:
Political FactorsMany elements of t
- Page 82 and 83:
international organizations working
- Page 84 and 85:
uling party. 433 There were some si
- Page 86 and 87:
especially highly-influential broad
- Page 88 and 89:
ationale behind the government’s
- Page 90 and 91:
international working for a major d
- Page 92 and 93:
Also, according to a World Bank rep
- Page 94 and 95:
willing to challenge authorities th
- Page 96 and 97:
The lack of narrative connecting po
- Page 98 and 99:
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE GEORGIAN GO
- Page 100 and 101:
the government also needs to commit
- Page 102 and 103:
‣ Continue to support and expand
- Page 104 and 105:
‣ Address male IDP needs (Immedia
- Page 106 and 107:
The campaign should have a face, su
- Page 108 and 109:
APPENDIX BList of IntervieweesLocal
- Page 110 and 111:
Kristy KellyLincoln MitchellLawrenc
- Page 112 and 113:
Article 10 - Non-discrimination in
- Page 114 and 115:
Principle 18.1 - Adequate standard
- Page 116 and 117:
Esaiashvili, Mariam (Official, Mini
- Page 118 and 119:
Lanskoy, Miriam and Giorgi Areshidz
- Page 120:
Transparency International Georgia.