organization, <strong>and</strong> highlighted that Synergy Network members have the right to dem<strong>and</strong> to be heard. 381Despite this encouragement, she “never heard from them aga<strong>in</strong>.” Overall, <strong>in</strong>ternational donors wantlocal NGOs to demonstrate a serious commitment by com<strong>in</strong>g to multilateral meet<strong>in</strong>gs with concreteproposals for improvement, <strong>in</strong>stead of tak<strong>in</strong>g an antagonistic approach to government officials.International DonorsDue to the low level of civil society <strong>in</strong>volvement on the part of <strong>Georgia</strong>ns <strong>in</strong> general, advancements <strong>in</strong>the area of political participation of IDPs <strong>and</strong> women have largely come about because of pressure from<strong>in</strong>ternational organizations, <strong>and</strong> not from a grassroots movement. At same time, some donor practicesmay also act as barriers to <strong>in</strong>clusive participation.As detailed <strong>in</strong> previous sections, the <strong>in</strong>ternational community’s <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>and</strong> support has assisted the<strong>Georgia</strong>n government <strong>in</strong> address<strong>in</strong>g human rights concerns related to <strong>in</strong>clusive governance, such as IDPvot<strong>in</strong>g rights <strong>and</strong> women’s underrepresentation <strong>in</strong> government. In addition to NGOs, IDP groups rely onthe <strong>in</strong>ternational community to advocate to the government for IDPs <strong>and</strong> women’s concerns, <strong>and</strong> to<strong>in</strong>clude IDP organizations <strong>in</strong> both the national <strong>and</strong> local policy process. UN agencies are considered to beparticularly <strong>in</strong>fluential because “they work well with the government, <strong>and</strong> UN agenciescan…<strong>in</strong>fluence…the government, whereas NGOs can’t.” 382UN Women’s role <strong>in</strong> push<strong>in</strong>g the government to develop their National Action Plan on UNSCR 1325 <strong>and</strong>their monitor<strong>in</strong>g of the government’s implementation of the Gender Equality Law serve as keyexamples. At the grassroots level, UN Women provides legal support to IDP women <strong>and</strong> men throughlegal cl<strong>in</strong>ics <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ances a number of local NGOs’ women’s empowerment programs.International donors’ lobby<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>Georgia</strong>n government to make the update of the IDP Action Plan amore participatory policymak<strong>in</strong>g process serves as another key example of their support for <strong>in</strong>clusivegovernance. For <strong>in</strong>stance, dur<strong>in</strong>g the development of the National Action Plan on IDPs, <strong>in</strong>ternationaldonors <strong>and</strong> NGOs lobbied for IDP groups to be consulted, <strong>and</strong> some even conducted their ownparticipatory assessments with IDPs to later <strong>in</strong>form the MRA.383Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Ombudsmanrepresentatives, it is unlikely that the MRA would have approached IDPs on their own, because thelatter would argue that they “consult IDPs every day when they come to the M<strong>in</strong>istry so they know whatthey (IDPs want), so there is no extra need for another special mechanism for consultations.”Nevertheless, the <strong>Georgia</strong>n government welcomes these donors because of the extensive support thatthey provide, <strong>in</strong> addition to the connection they offer to <strong>in</strong>ternational organizations, thereby <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<strong>Georgia</strong>’s presence on the <strong>in</strong>ternational stage. A range of stakeholders acknowledges that <strong>Georgia</strong>’s civil381 Carol<strong>in</strong>e Stampfer, Personal Interview <strong>and</strong> T<strong>in</strong>a Gewis, Personal Interview.382 Gvalia, Eka. CHCA. Personal Interview. March. 2012.383 <strong>Georgia</strong>n Ombudsman Representative. Personal Interview. March. 2012.73
society would be much weaker without <strong>in</strong>ternational support. 384 It is also <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that donorshave much more say over where the funds are used than <strong>in</strong> the past.Some NGO leaders express concern over this <strong>in</strong>creased control over the disbursement of <strong>in</strong>ternationalfunds, argu<strong>in</strong>g that it prevents IDPs from be<strong>in</strong>g able to choose among the durable solutions or <strong>in</strong>fluencepolicy priorities regard<strong>in</strong>g them. Rather, the “choice comes from the money <strong>and</strong> donorconditionality.” 385 Moreover, they argue that the MRA wants to <strong>in</strong>clude IDPs <strong>and</strong> implement betterprograms, but cannot secure the fund<strong>in</strong>g. The money received from donors is earmarked for certa<strong>in</strong>purposes, preclud<strong>in</strong>g it from be<strong>in</strong>g used for <strong>in</strong>itiatives not aligned with donor <strong>in</strong>terests.Gender Focus of International ProgramsInternational donors <strong>and</strong> NGOs also promote the <strong>in</strong>creased participation of women IDPs <strong>in</strong> politics, <strong>and</strong>gender equality more generally, through the programs they fund <strong>and</strong> implement. Their particularsupport for projects on women’s issues <strong>in</strong>fluences the high level of IDP women’s <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> theNGO sector compared to their male counterparts. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to a former government official <strong>and</strong> NGOrepresentative, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple this is a positive trend, but the “level of general <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>and</strong>underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of women’s issues is really still low, even at level of the NGOs.” 386 NGOs primarily haveexperience with psychosocial rehabilitation, <strong>and</strong> women’s issues <strong>in</strong> displacement sett<strong>in</strong>gs oraccommodation, <strong>and</strong> not with women’s rights more generally <strong>in</strong> the country. In many cases, womenface similar barriers whether they are displaced or not, <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g the ‘big picture’ can help <strong>in</strong>coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g efforts <strong>and</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g a strong movement for IDPs’ <strong>and</strong> women’s representation.Furthermore, this lack of underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of women’s issues more generally reflects an important barrierfor <strong>in</strong>creased women’s political participation. That is, despite recent legislative ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the area ofwomen’s rights, efforts to exp<strong>and</strong> gender equality are often viewed as unnecessary, believed to beimposed by <strong>in</strong>ternational donors <strong>and</strong> weaken traditional ways of life. 387In contrast to push<strong>in</strong>g a gender equality agenda, some donors may fund programs that lack any genderfocus at all, which has negative implications for support<strong>in</strong>g this broad goal. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to an NGO leader,“there are some problematic assumptions with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternational development sphere – developmentfails to realize that there are equal numbers of men <strong>and</strong> women <strong>and</strong> children (with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternationaldevelopment) - practitioners can be more successful if they realize this po<strong>in</strong>t.” 388 This exemplifies ageneral trend <strong>in</strong> development programm<strong>in</strong>g that tends to <strong>in</strong>corporate the needs of men, assum<strong>in</strong>g theyare the same for women.384 L<strong>in</strong>coln Mitchell (Associate Professor, Harriman Institute, Columbia University), Personal Interview, 9 December 2011 <strong>and</strong>Rusudan Kervalishvili, Personal Interview.385 IDP Woman Leader. Personal Interview. March. 2012.386 Tamar Tchelidze, Personal Interview.387 Asatoorian et al. “Gender Ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Education <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>: Analysis <strong>and</strong> Recommendations,” Columbia University.2010, 5.388 Kharavashvili, Julia. Personal Interview. January. 2012.74
- Page 2 and 3:
Promoting IDPs’ and Women’s Voi
- Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTSAcronyms and Abbreviations
- Page 6 and 7:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYInternally displac
- Page 8 and 9:
THE WOMEN’S POLITICAL RESOURCE CE
- Page 10 and 11:
fair reporting on politically sensi
- Page 12 and 13:
people-to-people diplomacy efforts
- Page 14 and 15:
and the Guiding Principles, in Febr
- Page 16 and 17:
an effort to address these stereoty
- Page 18 and 19:
The identities, perceptions, and re
- Page 20 and 21:
even IDPs themselves. The HRBA seek
- Page 22 and 23:
Karaleti settlement, and Potskho-Et
- Page 24 and 25: displacement differently, with men
- Page 26 and 27: on an equal footing with men in for
- Page 28 and 29: The Ministry for Internally Displac
- Page 30 and 31: Defender’s Office) and leave no r
- Page 32 and 33: prominent national level IDP NGO wo
- Page 34 and 35: in the past but none have yet to be
- Page 36 and 37: Grassroots Peacebuilding EffortsCiv
- Page 38 and 39: esettlement and local integration h
- Page 40 and 41: ability to contribute to the new Ac
- Page 42 and 43: Women convened a working group to a
- Page 44 and 45: were involved, in addition to “wo
- Page 46 and 47: towards addressing this population
- Page 48 and 49: waves. 224 A Conciliation Resources
- Page 50 and 51: governing shelter requirements. 238
- Page 52 and 53: esults of eviction on those who did
- Page 54 and 55: FINDINGSSIPA team member Drilon Gas
- Page 56 and 57: unique opportunities exist for them
- Page 58 and 59: an important opportunity for women
- Page 60 and 61: early morning…when I was going to
- Page 62 and 63: our office to investigate these iss
- Page 64 and 65: on this? It’s impossible.” 322
- Page 66 and 67: high levels of unemployment and pov
- Page 68 and 69: groups do not differentiate between
- Page 70 and 71: funding and influence to implement
- Page 72 and 73: een in operation for two years or l
- Page 76 and 77: The Education System’s Influence
- Page 78 and 79: system has an important role to pla
- Page 80 and 81: Political FactorsMany elements of t
- Page 82 and 83: international organizations working
- Page 84 and 85: uling party. 433 There were some si
- Page 86 and 87: especially highly-influential broad
- Page 88 and 89: ationale behind the government’s
- Page 90 and 91: international working for a major d
- Page 92 and 93: Also, according to a World Bank rep
- Page 94 and 95: willing to challenge authorities th
- Page 96 and 97: The lack of narrative connecting po
- Page 98 and 99: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE GEORGIAN GO
- Page 100 and 101: the government also needs to commit
- Page 102 and 103: ‣ Continue to support and expand
- Page 104 and 105: ‣ Address male IDP needs (Immedia
- Page 106 and 107: The campaign should have a face, su
- Page 108 and 109: APPENDIX BList of IntervieweesLocal
- Page 110 and 111: Kristy KellyLincoln MitchellLawrenc
- Page 112 and 113: Article 10 - Non-discrimination in
- Page 114 and 115: Principle 18.1 - Adequate standard
- Page 116 and 117: Esaiashvili, Mariam (Official, Mini
- Page 118 and 119: Lanskoy, Miriam and Giorgi Areshidz
- Page 120: Transparency International Georgia.