Also, accord<strong>in</strong>g to a World Bank report, the <strong>in</strong>comes earned <strong>and</strong> positions held by IDPs are generallylower than for the general population. 470 A staff member of the Office of the Public Defender exp<strong>and</strong>edon the particular vulnerability of IDPs l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g it to a vicious circle:“Unemployment is IDP-specific because IDPs are the most vulnerable. They are <strong>in</strong> asense disadvantaged because they don’t have access to education because theirfamilies lack f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources – it’s just a cha<strong>in</strong>. They don’t have propereducation, then they don’t have proper employment opportunities, etc.” 471Another differentiat<strong>in</strong>g factor that makes many IDPs more vulnerable <strong>in</strong> relation to the non-displacedpopulation is the lack of ownership of a permanent residence. This is especially significant <strong>in</strong> a countrylike <strong>Georgia</strong>, where the rate of home ownership is traditionally very high. Own<strong>in</strong>g a house is veryimportant for people’s sense of security, because they feel protected from becom<strong>in</strong>g totally destitute.Apart from the psychological burden this <strong>in</strong>stability creates among the IDP community, it entails veryconcrete economic disadvantages, such as the impossibility to get mortgage loans. This sense of<strong>in</strong>security <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stability relates to the psychosocial factors discussed earlier, challeng<strong>in</strong>g IDPs’ <strong>in</strong> theirefforts to <strong>in</strong>tegrate <strong>and</strong> participate <strong>in</strong> society.Relationship Between Economic Status <strong>and</strong> ParticipationSeveral <strong>in</strong>terviewees – <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Georgia</strong>n political figures, <strong>in</strong>ternationals, <strong>and</strong> members of the displacedcommunity represent<strong>in</strong>g a range of socioeconomic statuses cited poverty as a key factor affect<strong>in</strong>g IDPs’level of political activity. Poverty does not necessarily equal passivity <strong>in</strong> someone’s civic or politicalaction, but be<strong>in</strong>g economically disadvantaged certa<strong>in</strong>ly creates certa<strong>in</strong> barriers to participation.Obviously the first priority for any person must be survival, so political participation becomescomparatively a secondary issue. The struggle of many IDPs to meet their <strong>and</strong> their families’ basic needsoften takes precedence over political participation. Eka Gvalia, Executive Director of the NGO CharityHumanitarian Center “Abkhazeti,” expla<strong>in</strong>ed the impact of socio-economic status on IDPs’ civic activity:“In general, less active <strong>in</strong>volvement among IDPs is somehow based on their hardsocioeconomic conditions. Because of course everybody has priorities, <strong>and</strong> when itcomes to their family, <strong>in</strong>come is priority number one (to take care of the family) so theyhave really less time because they have to th<strong>in</strong>k of their priorities… we have to th<strong>in</strong>k ofthe socio-economic conditions.” 472470 Tskitishvili, Gocha; Dershem, Larry; <strong>and</strong> Kechakmadze, Vano. Social Capital <strong>and</strong> Employment Opportunities Among InternallyDisplaced Persons <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>. The World Bank, Tbilisi, May 2005. 34–36.471 Staff member of the Office of the Public Defender. Personal Interview. 15 March 2012.472 Eka Gvalia, Personal Interview.91
IDPs’ ongo<strong>in</strong>g fight for survival, as noted by one IDP woman, 473 saps the time <strong>and</strong> energy of many,deplet<strong>in</strong>g resources that <strong>in</strong> different circumstances could be channeled <strong>in</strong>to civic action. An INGOrepresentatives echoed this perspective, stat<strong>in</strong>g that for these reasons, IDPs “care less about thedecisions made by the state authorities.” 474 Faced with a lack of tangible, immediate necessities, tak<strong>in</strong>gthe time to be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> comparatively abstract political processes is simply not a practical option.In the case of women, they face a time burden that serves as a key socioeconomic factor <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>gtheir participation. Many of them work to provide for their families, <strong>in</strong> addition to tak<strong>in</strong>g care of thehouse <strong>and</strong> the children. As a result, they have few hours left <strong>in</strong> the day for other activities. Women’sextensive responsibilities for their families therefore serve as an additional barrier to their participation<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence over decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g processes, <strong>in</strong> comparison with men. The fact that NGOs providestable jobs for many women so that they can provide for their families, <strong>in</strong> contrast with the volatility <strong>and</strong>risk <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> politics, 475 could also expla<strong>in</strong> why IDP women —<strong>and</strong> women <strong>in</strong> general— areso much better represented <strong>in</strong> the NGO sector rather than <strong>in</strong> politics. At the same time, the economictransition after the fall of Communism caused a major decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the participation of women on thelabor market. Large differentials between the wages paid to women <strong>and</strong> men, <strong>and</strong> the decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g accesswomen have to jobs, have co<strong>in</strong>cided with a ris<strong>in</strong>g burden for women at home, due to shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g socialsafety nets <strong>and</strong> child care provisions. 476It is important to note that this dimension of poverty has a similar effect on the entirety of the <strong>Georgia</strong>npopulation struggl<strong>in</strong>g to make ends meet. 477 However, the loss <strong>and</strong> acute vulnerability that many IDPshave experienced as a result of their displacement may make some IDPs more sensitive to thepsychological impacts of poverty. In this sense, the ongo<strong>in</strong>g symptoms of poverty exacerbate theunderly<strong>in</strong>g trauma of displacement. Tamar Tchelidze, former Deputy M<strong>in</strong>ister of Economy <strong>and</strong>Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development who was displaced from Abkhazia, expla<strong>in</strong>ed:“[When you are an IDP], you don’t have a roof, you need to get a home, you need to get ajob, <strong>and</strong> you need basics that everyone has... When you lose these th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> such a pa<strong>in</strong>fulmanner, this k<strong>in</strong>d of traumatic experience forces you to th<strong>in</strong>k about these th<strong>in</strong>gs muchmore than other people would.” 478Her story re<strong>in</strong>forces the connection between socioeconomic <strong>and</strong> psychosocial factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g IDPs’experiences, which <strong>in</strong> turn affect their opportunities for participation.Poverty <strong>and</strong> the result<strong>in</strong>g reliance on the government for economic support also have fed the“dependency syndrome” that characterizes some members of the IDP community. IDPs may be less473 IDP woman. Personal <strong>in</strong>terview. 15 March 2012.474 Chabrava, Eliso (Danish Refugee Council). Personal <strong>in</strong>terview. 22 March 2012.475 Teona Kupunia, Personal Interview.476 UNDP. Enhanc<strong>in</strong>g Women’s Political Participation. Bratislava, 2009. 15.477 Mar<strong>in</strong>a Tabukashvili, Personal <strong>in</strong>terview.478 Tamar Tchelidze, Personal Interview.92
- Page 2 and 3:
Promoting IDPs’ and Women’s Voi
- Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTSAcronyms and Abbreviations
- Page 6 and 7:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYInternally displac
- Page 8 and 9:
THE WOMEN’S POLITICAL RESOURCE CE
- Page 10 and 11:
fair reporting on politically sensi
- Page 12 and 13:
people-to-people diplomacy efforts
- Page 14 and 15:
and the Guiding Principles, in Febr
- Page 16 and 17:
an effort to address these stereoty
- Page 18 and 19:
The identities, perceptions, and re
- Page 20 and 21:
even IDPs themselves. The HRBA seek
- Page 22 and 23:
Karaleti settlement, and Potskho-Et
- Page 24 and 25:
displacement differently, with men
- Page 26 and 27:
on an equal footing with men in for
- Page 28 and 29:
The Ministry for Internally Displac
- Page 30 and 31:
Defender’s Office) and leave no r
- Page 32 and 33:
prominent national level IDP NGO wo
- Page 34 and 35:
in the past but none have yet to be
- Page 36 and 37:
Grassroots Peacebuilding EffortsCiv
- Page 38 and 39:
esettlement and local integration h
- Page 40 and 41:
ability to contribute to the new Ac
- Page 42 and 43: Women convened a working group to a
- Page 44 and 45: were involved, in addition to “wo
- Page 46 and 47: towards addressing this population
- Page 48 and 49: waves. 224 A Conciliation Resources
- Page 50 and 51: governing shelter requirements. 238
- Page 52 and 53: esults of eviction on those who did
- Page 54 and 55: FINDINGSSIPA team member Drilon Gas
- Page 56 and 57: unique opportunities exist for them
- Page 58 and 59: an important opportunity for women
- Page 60 and 61: early morning…when I was going to
- Page 62 and 63: our office to investigate these iss
- Page 64 and 65: on this? It’s impossible.” 322
- Page 66 and 67: high levels of unemployment and pov
- Page 68 and 69: groups do not differentiate between
- Page 70 and 71: funding and influence to implement
- Page 72 and 73: een in operation for two years or l
- Page 74 and 75: organization, and highlighted that
- Page 76 and 77: The Education System’s Influence
- Page 78 and 79: system has an important role to pla
- Page 80 and 81: Political FactorsMany elements of t
- Page 82 and 83: international organizations working
- Page 84 and 85: uling party. 433 There were some si
- Page 86 and 87: especially highly-influential broad
- Page 88 and 89: ationale behind the government’s
- Page 90 and 91: international working for a major d
- Page 94 and 95: willing to challenge authorities th
- Page 96 and 97: The lack of narrative connecting po
- Page 98 and 99: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE GEORGIAN GO
- Page 100 and 101: the government also needs to commit
- Page 102 and 103: ‣ Continue to support and expand
- Page 104 and 105: ‣ Address male IDP needs (Immedia
- Page 106 and 107: The campaign should have a face, su
- Page 108 and 109: APPENDIX BList of IntervieweesLocal
- Page 110 and 111: Kristy KellyLincoln MitchellLawrenc
- Page 112 and 113: Article 10 - Non-discrimination in
- Page 114 and 115: Principle 18.1 - Adequate standard
- Page 116 and 117: Esaiashvili, Mariam (Official, Mini
- Page 118 and 119: Lanskoy, Miriam and Giorgi Areshidz
- Page 120: Transparency International Georgia.