Women convened a work<strong>in</strong>g group to analyze the Law on IDPs, the State Strategy <strong>and</strong> the Action Plan toensure that they align with CEDAW <strong>and</strong> Security Council Resolutions. This <strong>in</strong>clusive process <strong>in</strong>volvedrepresentatives of the MRA, M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health, Labor, <strong>and</strong> Social Affairs, UNHCR, women’s NGOs, <strong>and</strong>grassroots participants, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g IDPs from Gori, activists, <strong>and</strong> academics. The work<strong>in</strong>g group compiledrecommendations <strong>and</strong> delivered them to the MRA, which <strong>in</strong> turn <strong>in</strong>cluded some of these suggestions <strong>in</strong>the amended Law on IDPs, adopted <strong>in</strong> late 2011. Tamar Tavartkiladze of UN Women notes that “one ofour recommendations was to amend the def<strong>in</strong>ition of <strong>in</strong>ternally displaced persons <strong>and</strong> to add theconcept of discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> gender equality, <strong>and</strong> that was accepted.” 199 UN Women has alsospearheaded efforts to <strong>in</strong>clude gender-sensitive language <strong>in</strong> the revised IDP Action Plan for 2012-2014:“There we succeeded to have 2 objectives <strong>in</strong>cluded…s<strong>in</strong>gle women <strong>and</strong> women-headedhouseholds with multiple children…<strong>and</strong> other vulnerable groups who need specialaccommodation dur<strong>in</strong>g the hous<strong>in</strong>g allocation. And also that women’s issues <strong>and</strong> rightsshould be taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration while allocat<strong>in</strong>g the new houses <strong>and</strong> settlements toIDPs.” 200The <strong>in</strong>volvement of women <strong>and</strong> IDPs <strong>in</strong> these processes thus seems to directly <strong>in</strong>fluence the <strong>in</strong>clusion oftheir specific needs <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>in</strong> policies affect<strong>in</strong>g them.Exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the broader role of women IDPs <strong>in</strong> policymak<strong>in</strong>g, we see that they are significantly moredirectly <strong>in</strong>volved than men at the local level. Mariam Esaishvili of the MRA observes that primarilywomen engage <strong>in</strong> the MRA’s efforts to <strong>in</strong>clude IDPs <strong>in</strong> policy development <strong>in</strong>itiatives, “s<strong>in</strong>ce they aregenerally more active <strong>in</strong> community organiz<strong>in</strong>g, NGOs <strong>and</strong> community groups.” 201 A representative ofDRC <strong>in</strong> Zugdidi echoes this po<strong>in</strong>t.“In general, IDP women are very active, <strong>and</strong> when we…enter collective centers, <strong>and</strong>when we want to mobilize these people, I would say 70% of them are females. Andwhen we had conferences <strong>in</strong> Tbilisi, IDP conferences, <strong>and</strong> DRC managed somehow tobr<strong>in</strong>g together government <strong>and</strong> IDPs <strong>and</strong> different <strong>in</strong>ternational organizations <strong>and</strong> NGOswork<strong>in</strong>g on IDP issues, <strong>and</strong> we took many people from here…65% of them werefemales…because they are more active somehow.” 202The high level of <strong>in</strong>volvement of women <strong>in</strong> such efforts is important given their overall lack of <strong>in</strong>fluenceover official decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>. We have seen how it directly <strong>in</strong>fluences a greater awareness oftheir particular concerns with<strong>in</strong> policy documents. However, this discrepancy between men’s <strong>and</strong>women’s <strong>in</strong>volvement highlights the need to empower IDP men IDP to contribute to policymak<strong>in</strong>g.This issue also highlights two related issues regard<strong>in</strong>g power structures <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>n society. First,women’s significant level of local engagement <strong>in</strong> many ways fails to challenge men’s power <strong>in</strong> officialstructures. Second, IDPs face a challenge <strong>in</strong> connect<strong>in</strong>g their local problems with macro policy199 Tamar Tavartkiladze (Project Manager, UN Women), Personal Interview, 12 March 2012.200 Ibid.201 Mariam Esaishvili (MRA), Personal Interview, 30 January 2012.202 Mzevi Jojua (Danish Refugee Council), Personal Interview, 20 March 2012.41
approaches to address<strong>in</strong>g them. As women are generally more <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> activism on IDP issues, itfollows that gender plays a role <strong>in</strong> limit<strong>in</strong>g IDPs’ ability to <strong>in</strong>fluence higher-level policymak<strong>in</strong>g processes.Parliament’s Gender Equality Council may help address this issue. It focuses particularly on <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gthe <strong>in</strong>volvement of women IDPs, usually by engag<strong>in</strong>g with female NGO representatives. For example,Julia Kharashvili of the IDP Women’s Association “Consent” sits on the Council as an IDP activist. TheCouncil more generally conducts “meet<strong>in</strong>gs with the lead<strong>in</strong>g women IDPs,” who support programs “onf<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g women leaders <strong>and</strong> rais<strong>in</strong>g their awareness on political <strong>and</strong> economic activities.” 203 Policydocuments such as the action plans on IDPs <strong>and</strong> gender equality play an important role, <strong>in</strong> that they“make the executive accountable to these responsibilities.” Zurab Mchedlishvili, the council’scoord<strong>in</strong>ator, also recognizes the limits of the Council: "The State has expressed its will<strong>in</strong>gness toregulate the gender equality issues <strong>in</strong> the country. However, due to the lack of state resources, thesupport from donor organizations is crucial for the regulation of these issues." 204 Broader attitudestowards the equal <strong>in</strong>volvement of women alongside men <strong>in</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g may also curtail theCouncil’s effectiveness. However, it rema<strong>in</strong>s an important step forward <strong>in</strong> women’s <strong>and</strong> particularlyIDPs’ opportunities for participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> policymak<strong>in</strong>g.Develop<strong>in</strong>g the National Action Plan for Implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1325The <strong>Georgia</strong>n government’s adoption of the UN Security Council Resolutions on “Women, Peace <strong>and</strong>Security” (1325, 1820, 1888, 1889 <strong>and</strong> 1960) <strong>and</strong> the National Action Plan for Implementation (NAP)present a positive model of women’s <strong>and</strong> IDPs’ participation <strong>in</strong> national-level policymak<strong>in</strong>g. While theresolutions address conflict-affected women more broadly, IDPs are a key target population <strong>and</strong> thedocument explicitly references them <strong>in</strong> most of its objectives. The NAP, approved by the <strong>Georgia</strong>nParliament on 27 December 2011, promotes women’s participation <strong>in</strong> conflict resolution, elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>ggender-based violence, <strong>and</strong> address<strong>in</strong>g women’s particular needs <strong>in</strong> conflict <strong>and</strong> recovery. 205In many ways parallel<strong>in</strong>g the development of the IDP State Strategy <strong>and</strong> updated Action Plan, theprocess of creat<strong>in</strong>g the NAP also <strong>in</strong>volved a number of <strong>in</strong>ternational, national, <strong>and</strong> local stakeholders.UN Women created an ad-hoc government commission that <strong>in</strong>cluded civil society representatives. Mostnotably, however, it clearly engaged IDPs <strong>and</strong> conflict-affected women to contribute to the policy. A UNWomen representative describes how both “the grassroots…rural women…<strong>in</strong> buffer zones…womenliv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> collective centers, IDPs who have experienced all the consequences of conflict on their lives”203 Zurab Mchedlishvili (Coord<strong>in</strong>ator of the Gender Equality Council), Personal Interview, 15 March 2012.204 Ibid.205 Government of <strong>Georgia</strong>. “2012-2015 National Action Plan for Implementation of the UN Security Council Resolutions #1325,1820, 1888, 1889 <strong>and</strong> 1960 on ‘Women, Peace <strong>and</strong> Security.’” 27 December 2011.42
- Page 2 and 3: Promoting IDPs’ and Women’s Voi
- Page 4 and 5: CONTENTSAcronyms and Abbreviations
- Page 6 and 7: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYInternally displac
- Page 8 and 9: THE WOMEN’S POLITICAL RESOURCE CE
- Page 10 and 11: fair reporting on politically sensi
- Page 12 and 13: people-to-people diplomacy efforts
- Page 14 and 15: and the Guiding Principles, in Febr
- Page 16 and 17: an effort to address these stereoty
- Page 18 and 19: The identities, perceptions, and re
- Page 20 and 21: even IDPs themselves. The HRBA seek
- Page 22 and 23: Karaleti settlement, and Potskho-Et
- Page 24 and 25: displacement differently, with men
- Page 26 and 27: on an equal footing with men in for
- Page 28 and 29: The Ministry for Internally Displac
- Page 30 and 31: Defender’s Office) and leave no r
- Page 32 and 33: prominent national level IDP NGO wo
- Page 34 and 35: in the past but none have yet to be
- Page 36 and 37: Grassroots Peacebuilding EffortsCiv
- Page 38 and 39: esettlement and local integration h
- Page 40 and 41: ability to contribute to the new Ac
- Page 44 and 45: were involved, in addition to “wo
- Page 46 and 47: towards addressing this population
- Page 48 and 49: waves. 224 A Conciliation Resources
- Page 50 and 51: governing shelter requirements. 238
- Page 52 and 53: esults of eviction on those who did
- Page 54 and 55: FINDINGSSIPA team member Drilon Gas
- Page 56 and 57: unique opportunities exist for them
- Page 58 and 59: an important opportunity for women
- Page 60 and 61: early morning…when I was going to
- Page 62 and 63: our office to investigate these iss
- Page 64 and 65: on this? It’s impossible.” 322
- Page 66 and 67: high levels of unemployment and pov
- Page 68 and 69: groups do not differentiate between
- Page 70 and 71: funding and influence to implement
- Page 72 and 73: een in operation for two years or l
- Page 74 and 75: organization, and highlighted that
- Page 76 and 77: The Education System’s Influence
- Page 78 and 79: system has an important role to pla
- Page 80 and 81: Political FactorsMany elements of t
- Page 82 and 83: international organizations working
- Page 84 and 85: uling party. 433 There were some si
- Page 86 and 87: especially highly-influential broad
- Page 88 and 89: ationale behind the government’s
- Page 90 and 91: international working for a major d
- Page 92 and 93:
Also, according to a World Bank rep
- Page 94 and 95:
willing to challenge authorities th
- Page 96 and 97:
The lack of narrative connecting po
- Page 98 and 99:
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE GEORGIAN GO
- Page 100 and 101:
the government also needs to commit
- Page 102 and 103:
‣ Continue to support and expand
- Page 104 and 105:
‣ Address male IDP needs (Immedia
- Page 106 and 107:
The campaign should have a face, su
- Page 108 and 109:
APPENDIX BList of IntervieweesLocal
- Page 110 and 111:
Kristy KellyLincoln MitchellLawrenc
- Page 112 and 113:
Article 10 - Non-discrimination in
- Page 114 and 115:
Principle 18.1 - Adequate standard
- Page 116 and 117:
Esaiashvili, Mariam (Official, Mini
- Page 118 and 119:
Lanskoy, Miriam and Giorgi Areshidz
- Page 120:
Transparency International Georgia.