10.07.2015 Views

Promoting IDPs' and Women's Voices in Post-Conflict Georgia

Promoting IDPs' and Women's Voices in Post-Conflict Georgia

Promoting IDPs' and Women's Voices in Post-Conflict Georgia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace <strong>and</strong> Securityo Article 1: Increase representation of women at all decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g levels <strong>in</strong> conflictresolution <strong>and</strong> peace processeso Article 8: Adopt a gender perspective <strong>in</strong> peace agreements• The UN Guid<strong>in</strong>g Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples on Internal Displacement 62 :This document provides the cornerstone of our analysis of the participation of IDPs <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>.The Guid<strong>in</strong>g Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples comprise an <strong>in</strong>ternationally-recognized (though non-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g) st<strong>and</strong>ard ofrights specific to IDPs <strong>and</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g duties of governments <strong>and</strong> other actors “provid<strong>in</strong>gassistance <strong>and</strong> protection to IDPs.” 63 The Guid<strong>in</strong>g Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples def<strong>in</strong>e three “durable solutions” todisplacement: <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>in</strong> the place of displacement, 64 resettlement to another part of thecountry, <strong>and</strong> dignified safe return. The Guid<strong>in</strong>g Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples name national authorities as theprimary duty-bearers with responsibility to “establish the conditions, as well as provide themeans” to make each of these solutions available for IDPs to choose freely. 65 Central to ourproject is the provision that national authorities <strong>and</strong> other duty-bearers make special efforts to“ensure the full participation of displaced persons <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> management of theirreturn, resettlement <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration.” 66 The Government of <strong>Georgia</strong> notes the relevance of theGuid<strong>in</strong>g Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>in</strong> its policies documents. However, it narrows the Guid<strong>in</strong>g Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples’def<strong>in</strong>ition of IDPs fail<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>clude people displaced by natural disasters, focus<strong>in</strong>g only on thosefrom the conflict regions.Research ProcessWe determ<strong>in</strong>ed that a qualitative research strategy would allow us to ga<strong>in</strong> the most nuancedunderst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g IDPs’ political participation. While our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs cannot be taken asprov<strong>in</strong>g causation or as be<strong>in</strong>g representative of all IDPs <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong>, the scope of our analysis supportsgreater underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of opportunities for greater <strong>and</strong> more effective <strong>in</strong>clusion of IDPs <strong>in</strong> policymak<strong>in</strong>g.In addition to desk research, our assessment is based on orig<strong>in</strong>al source materials gathered throughroughly 70 semi-structured <strong>and</strong> spontaneous personal <strong>in</strong>terviews <strong>and</strong> five focus groups. Team membersconducted two field visits to <strong>Georgia</strong> total<strong>in</strong>g 24 days, with fieldwork done <strong>in</strong> Tbilisi, Zugdidi, Koda,62 Guid<strong>in</strong>g Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples on Internal Displacement. Brook<strong>in</strong>gs – LSE Project on Internal Displacement. Web. 15 Dec. 2011.63 Ibid.64 We adopt an underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of the term “<strong>in</strong>tegration” that is specific to the <strong>Georgia</strong>n context. The discourse <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong> onthis topic ranges from view<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tegration as mutually exclusive with IDPs’ return to their former home, while the more recentview presented <strong>in</strong> the state strategy suggests that these two concepts can also be complementary. 64 We also differentiatebetween <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>and</strong> assimilation. The former term usually refers to migrant groups both adjust<strong>in</strong>g to life <strong>in</strong> their newenvironment <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g their identity, while the latter generally refers to a process whereby the dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g markersbetween migrant groups <strong>and</strong> host societies fall away. 64 These issues become relevant when consider<strong>in</strong>g the current situation ofprotracted displacement <strong>in</strong> <strong>Georgia</strong> <strong>and</strong> its effects on the ways <strong>in</strong> which <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>and</strong> assimilation play a role <strong>in</strong> IDPs lives.These issues also relate to the extent to which the broader society views displaced persons as a dist<strong>in</strong>ct social group.65 United Nations Office for the Coord<strong>in</strong>ation of Humanitarian Affairs. Guid<strong>in</strong>g Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples on Internal Displacement. 2004. 14.66 Ibid.20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!