targeted services to low-wage workers, displaced workers, 1 at-risk youth, and other groups ofstudents who might benefit. Over a period of several months, Lorain and MDRC defined andfleshed out the package of services that constituted the college’s Opening Doors program.Although Lorain initially considered targeting only students who were low-wage workers, itexpanded the eligibility criteria to meet the sample size requirements for the study and thusincluded a broader subset of the college’s low-income students, some of whom were notworking. Lorain launched its program during the fall 2003 semester.After Lorain had joined the Opening Doors demonstration, MDRC and some of thedemonstration’s funders were interested in including a second Ohio college in the study. Theleadership of Owens Community College was interested in the opportunity, and in late 2003,Owens and MDRC began working together. Various program interventions were discussed, butit was quickly agreed that Owens would implement a program similar to Lorain’s and target thesame population. To get help designing their program, Owens administrators visited Lorain tolearn about its program and its experiences in the study. The two colleges remained in touchthroughout the implementation of their programs. Owens ran a small pilot of its Opening Doorsprogram, serving about 35 students, during the summer 2004 semester, and kicked off its fullscaleprogram during fall 2004. The program operated at both Lorain and Owens through spring2006, with a new cohort at each college enrolling in the study every fall and spring semester2through fall 2005.Implementation of the Opening Doors ProgramAfter providing some information about the timing of the program services and the program’sstaffing, this section describes the implementation of the program’s enhanced studentservices and stipend.Timing of Program ServicesThe Ohio colleges operated their Opening Doors program to its full extent during thefall and spring semesters. The program’s designers intended that participating students wouldreceive the full array of program services for two semesters. Thus, program group students whostarted in Opening Doors in a fall semester continued through the spring, and students whobegan in a spring semester participated in the program the following fall semester.1 According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2008), “Displaced workers are defined as persons 20years of age and older who lost or left jobs because their plant or company closed or moved, there wasinsufficient work for them to do, or their position or shift was abolished.”2 At Lorain, the program was called “Opening Doors Enhanced Services.” At Owens, it was called “OwensPersonalized Enhancement Network,” or OPEN.26
Toward the end of each student’s second semester in the study, the Opening Doorscounselors prepared them to make the transition out of the program and encouraged them tobegin using the college’s standard advising and counseling services. During interviews withMDRC, Opening Doors counselors reported that some students continued to seek assistancefrom the program after their two semesters ended, and that the counselors tended to help thestudents who reached out to them. This scenario occurred more frequently at Lorain than it didat Owens.Also, some students in the program group received assistance from Opening Doorsduring the summer semester, but the services were far less intensive. During summers, counselorswere available to help students, but they did not offer help as proactively, systematically,or regularly. (As discussed below, during the summer of 2004, Lorain used extra programfunding to provide an additional $75 stipend to program group students who were taking atleast one course.)Administrative Structure, Staffing, and TrainingThe Opening Doors program at Lorain and Owens was housed in the Student Servicesdivision of the college and was overseen by administrators in that division. Each program had afull-time Opening Doors program coordinator, who also served as an Opening Doors counselor,and two or three part-time counselors. The part-time counselors all worked full time at thecollege, and thus had other duties (including working in the college’s counseling center, leadingcareer development workshops, and recruiting students to the college). At Lorain, one of thepart-time counselors spent about half of her time on Opening Doors, another spent about onefourthof her time on the program, and the third part-time counselor spent about one-tenth of histime on Opening Doors. At Owens, the part-time counselors each spent about half of their timeon Opening Doors.Most of the Opening Doors counselors had experience working at the college, while afew were hired for the program. The Opening Doors counselors received some training in theprogram model. Staff without experience as academic advisers also received training in thataspect of the role. Training topics included the requirements of different majors at the college,and course scheduling and registration issues.Both colleges assigned administrative staff to Opening Doors, who helped recruit samplemembers, scheduled appointments, and maintained program records. Owens also hired astudent worker to help with the administrative tasks, and arranged for staff from the college’sStudent Outreach Services (SOS) unit to call students during recruitment and to remind themabout appointments.27
- Page 1: OPENING DOORSMORE GUIDANCE,BETTER R
- Page 4 and 5: Funders of the Opening Doors Projec
- Page 7 and 8: ContentsOverviewList of Tables, Fig
- Page 9 and 10: List of Tables, Figures, and BoxesT
- Page 11: PrefaceIf approved by Congress, the
- Page 14 and 15: guidance on the study. Thomas Brock
- Page 16 and 17: • The Ohio colleges successfully
- Page 18 and 19: Program group members were assigned
- Page 20 and 21: • For the most part, the program
- Page 22 and 23: offered, but might also provide stu
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 1IntroductionOver the last
- Page 27 and 28: The Opening Doors DemonstrationTabl
- Page 29 and 30: sure that students complete the req
- Page 31 and 32: While the mechanism through which s
- Page 33 and 34: imately 1,700 to 1 in 2001. 22 Exac
- Page 35: of literature exist on career couns
- Page 38 and 39: The CollegeLorain County Community
- Page 40 and 41: • Were beginning freshmen or cont
- Page 42 and 43: The Opening Doors DemonstrationTabl
- Page 44 and 45: Table 2.1 (continued)SOURCE: MDRC c
- Page 46 and 47: Lorain and Owens Financial Aid Data
- Page 49: Chapter 3The Implementation of the
- Page 53 and 54: meet with their counselor a minimum
- Page 55: The Opening Doors DemonstrationTabl
- Page 59 and 60: Appendix Table C.2 shows informatio
- Page 61: Opening Doors counselors, and progr
- Page 64 and 65: Program Control Difference Standard
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 4The Effects of Enhanced St
- Page 69 and 70: Program SemestersTable 4.1 (page 47
- Page 71 and 72: Program Control Difference Standard
- Page 73 and 74: Program Control Difference Standard
- Page 75 and 76: The Opening Doors DemonstrationTabl
- Page 77 and 78: Transcript Outcomes by GenderAssess
- Page 79 and 80: Program Control Difference Standard
- Page 81 and 82: Program Control Difference Standard
- Page 83 and 84: correspond with the program’s imp
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 5Summary and ConclusionsLor
- Page 87 and 88: The Opening Doors DemonstrationFigu
- Page 89 and 90: An alternative interpretation of th
- Page 91: Appendix ASupplementary Baseline In
- Page 94 and 95: Full Program ControlCharacteristic
- Page 96 and 97: Appendix Table A.1 (continued)Full
- Page 98 and 99: Full Program ControlCharacteristic
- Page 100 and 101:
Appendix Table A.2 (continued)Full
- Page 102 and 103:
Appendix Table A.3 (continued)Full
- Page 105:
Appendix BSurvey Response Analysis
- Page 108 and 109:
Background Characteristics of Surve
- Page 110 and 111:
Table B.1 (continued)Characteristic
- Page 112 and 113:
The Opening Doors DemonstrationAppe
- Page 114 and 115:
Table B.2 (continued)SOURCE: MDRC c
- Page 116 and 117:
Table B.3 (continued)Characteristic
- Page 118 and 119:
The Opening Doors DemonstrationAppe
- Page 120 and 121:
Table B.4 (continued)SOURCE: MDRC c
- Page 122 and 123:
Table B.5 (continued)Characteristic
- Page 124 and 125:
The Opening Doors DemonstrationAppe
- Page 126 and 127:
Table B.6 (continued)SOURCE: MDRC c
- Page 129 and 130:
Lorain OwensProgram ProgramOutcome
- Page 131 and 132:
Lorain County Community CollegeOwen
- Page 133:
Appendix DDescription of Scales Pre
- Page 136 and 137:
4. I hardly ever expect things to g
- Page 138 and 139:
Social Support and Civic Engagement
- Page 140 and 141:
Psychological Distress (6-item summ
- Page 143 and 144:
Lorain County Community CollegeOwen
- Page 145 and 146:
Lorain County Community CollegeOwen
- Page 147 and 148:
Lorain County Community CollegeOwen
- Page 149 and 150:
Male SubgroupFemale SubgroupDiffere
- Page 151 and 152:
Male SubgroupFemale SubgroupDiffere
- Page 153 and 154:
Male SubgroupFemale SubgroupDiffere
- Page 155 and 156:
Lorain County Community CollegeOwen
- Page 157 and 158:
Appendix Table E.7 (continued)SOURC
- Page 159 and 160:
Lorain County Community CollegeOwen
- Page 161 and 162:
The Opening Doors DemonstrationAppe
- Page 163 and 164:
Appendix Table E.10 (continued)SOUR
- Page 165 and 166:
ReferencesAdelman, Clifford. 2004.
- Page 167 and 168:
EARLIER MDRC PUBLICATIONS ON OPENIN
- Page 169:
About MDRCMDRC is a nonprofit, nonp