10.07.2015 Views

rise-and-fall-of-the-third-reich-william-shirer-pdf

rise-and-fall-of-the-third-reich-william-shirer-pdf

rise-and-fall-of-the-third-reich-william-shirer-pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 33AFTERWORDThis book had a surprising reception.No one – not my publisher, my editor, my agent, my friends – believed that<strong>the</strong> public would buy a book so long, so full <strong>of</strong> footnotes, so expensive, <strong>and</strong> onsuch a subject. My lecture agent had told me <strong>the</strong>re was no more interest inHitler <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Third Reich <strong>and</strong> that 1 would have to talk about something else.My publisher printed only 12,500 copies in advance.The fact that <strong>the</strong> book started at once to attract considerable readershipwas <strong>the</strong>refore a pleasant surp<strong>rise</strong> to us all. I never kept track <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sales myself– ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hardcover edition brought out by Simon <strong>and</strong> Schuster or <strong>the</strong>mass-market paperback edition brought out by Fawcett. I was surp<strong>rise</strong>d to heartwo or three years ago that <strong>the</strong> Book-<strong>of</strong>-<strong>the</strong>-Month Club had sold more copies <strong>of</strong>The Rise <strong>and</strong> Fall <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Third Reich than <strong>of</strong> any o<strong>the</strong>r book in its history. Buthow many copies, I have no idea. The book also did well abroad – in Britain,France, <strong>and</strong> Italy, though less well in Germany.The reviews <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> book, except in Germany, were much more perceptivethan I had expected. And though <strong>the</strong> academic historians, on <strong>the</strong> whole, werecool to <strong>the</strong> book <strong>and</strong> to me (as if I were a usurper with no right to invade <strong>the</strong>irfield – to write good history, <strong>the</strong>y said, you had to teach it), <strong>the</strong>re were notableexceptions.H. R. Trevor-Roper, for instance. I felt some trepidation when I first heardthat <strong>the</strong> Sunday New York Times Book Review had given him <strong>the</strong> book toreview. He was a prestigious historian at Oxford whom I much admired – Ihad found his book The Last Days <strong>of</strong> Hitler very valuable. But British bookreviewers at that time had been ra<strong>the</strong>r hard on American authors, <strong>and</strong> besides,as an eminent academic, Trevor-Roper might share, I thought, <strong>the</strong> disdain <strong>of</strong>his American colleagues for journalists who try to write history. So I concludedI would probably be clobbered in <strong>the</strong> publication that was most important forAmerican writers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir books.But Trevor-Roper too surp<strong>rise</strong>d. The headline above his page-one reviewgave a hint as to what he would have to say:LIGHT ON OUR CENTURY’S DARKEST NIGHTThe Awful Story <strong>of</strong> Hitler’s Germany Is Movingly Told in Masterly Study1027

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!