10.07.2015 Views

rise-and-fall-of-the-third-reich-william-shirer-pdf

rise-and-fall-of-the-third-reich-william-shirer-pdf

rise-and-fall-of-the-third-reich-william-shirer-pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE ROAD TO MUNICH 347a rump Czech state against Nazi Germany seems incredible, but his fantasticrecommendations apparently made a deep impression on <strong>the</strong> British cabinet <strong>and</strong>bolstered Chamberlain’s intention to meet Hitler’s dem<strong>and</strong>s. ∗Premier Daladier <strong>and</strong> his Foreign Minister, Georges Bonnet, arrived in Londonon September 18, for consultations with <strong>the</strong> British cabinet. No thoughtwas given to bringing <strong>the</strong> Czechs in. The British <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> French, anxious toavoid war at any cost, lost little time in agreeing on joint proposals which <strong>the</strong>Czechs would have to accept. All territories inhabited more than 50 per cent bySudeten Germans must be turned over to Germany to assure ”<strong>the</strong> maintenance<strong>of</strong> peace <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> Czechoslovakia’s vital interests.” In return Britain <strong>and</strong>France agreed to join in ”an international guarantee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new boundaries . . .against unprovoked aggression.” Such a guarantee would supplant <strong>the</strong> mutualassistancetreaties which <strong>the</strong> Czech state had with France <strong>and</strong> Russia. Thiswas an easy way out for <strong>the</strong> French, <strong>and</strong> led by Bonnet, who, as <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong>events would show, was determined to outdo Chamberlain in <strong>the</strong> appeasement<strong>of</strong> Hitler, <strong>the</strong>y seized upon it. And <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re was <strong>the</strong> cant.Both <strong>the</strong> French <strong>and</strong> British governments [<strong>the</strong>y told <strong>the</strong> Czechs ina formal note] recognize how great is <strong>the</strong> sacrifice thus required <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Czechoslovak Government in <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> peace. But becausethat cause is common both to Europe in general <strong>and</strong> in particularto Czechoslovakia herself <strong>the</strong>y have felt it <strong>the</strong>ir duty jointly to setforth frankly <strong>the</strong> conditions essential to secure it.Also, <strong>the</strong>y were in a hurry, The German dictator could not wait.The Prime Minister must resume conversations with Herr Hitler notlater than Wednesday [September 22], <strong>and</strong> earlier if possible. We<strong>the</strong>refore feel we must ask for your reply at <strong>the</strong> earliest possiblemoment. 375And so at noon on September 19 <strong>the</strong> British <strong>and</strong> French ministers in Praguejointly presented <strong>the</strong> Anglo-French proposals to <strong>the</strong> Czech government. Theywere rejected <strong>the</strong> next day in a dignified note which explained – prophetically– that to accept <strong>the</strong>m would put Czechoslovakia ”sooner or later under <strong>the</strong>complete domination <strong>of</strong> Germany.” After reminding France <strong>of</strong> her treaty obligations<strong>and</strong> also <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> consequences to <strong>the</strong> French position in Europe should<strong>the</strong> Czechs yield, <strong>the</strong> reply <strong>of</strong>fered to submit <strong>the</strong> whole Sudeten question toarbitration under <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> German-Czech treaty <strong>of</strong> October 16, 1925. †But <strong>the</strong> British <strong>and</strong> French were in no mood to allow such a matter as <strong>the</strong>sanctity <strong>of</strong> treaties to interfere with <strong>the</strong> course <strong>the</strong>y had set. No sooner was∗ Though <strong>the</strong> main points <strong>of</strong> Runciman’s recommendations were presented to <strong>the</strong> cabineton <strong>the</strong> evening <strong>of</strong> September 16, <strong>the</strong> report itself was not <strong>of</strong>ficially made until <strong>the</strong> twenty-first,<strong>and</strong> not published until <strong>the</strong> twenty-eighth, when events had made it only <strong>of</strong> academic interest.Wheeler-Bennett points out that certain parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> report give <strong>the</strong> impression <strong>of</strong> havingbeen written after September 21. When Runciman left Prague on <strong>the</strong> morning <strong>of</strong> September16, no one, not even Hitler or <strong>the</strong> Sudeten leaders, had gone so far as to suggest that <strong>the</strong>Sudetenl<strong>and</strong> be turned over to Germany without a plebiscite. (Wheeler-Bennett, Munich, pp.111-12. The text <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Runciman report is in <strong>the</strong> British White Paper, Cmd. 5847, No. 1.)† It is worth noting that nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> British nor <strong>the</strong> French government published <strong>the</strong> text<strong>of</strong> this Czech note when <strong>the</strong>y later issued <strong>the</strong> documents justifying <strong>the</strong>ir policies which led upto Munich.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!