Guam Hazard Mitigation Plan - Western States Seismic Policy Council

STANDARD STATE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALKFEMA REGION IXState: Guam Date of Plan: March 2011C. Does the new or updated plan include the probability of futureevents (i.e., chance of occurrence) for each hazard addressed inthe plan?Hazardous materials, Section 5.3.6High surf, Section 5.3.7Lightning, Section 5.3.8Non-seismic ground failure, Section 5.3.9Salt spray, Section 5.3.10Severe wind, Section 5.3.11Slope failure, Section 5.3.12Terrorism, Section 5.3.13Transportation accident, Section 5.3.14Tropical cyclone, Section 5.3.15Tsunami, Section 5.3.16Wildland fire, Section 5.3.17Coastal erosion, Section 5.3.1Disease, Section 5.3.2Drought, Section 5.3.3Earthquake, Section 5.3.4Flooding, Section 5.3.5Hazardous materials, Section 5.3.6High surf, Section 5.3.7Lightning, Section 5.3.8Non-seismic ground failure, Section 5.3.9Salt spray, Section 5.3.10Severe wind, Section 5.3.11Slope failure, Section 5.3.12Terrorism, Section 5.3.13Transportation accident, Section 5.3.14Tropical cyclone, Section 5.3.15Tsunami, Section 5.3.16Wildland fire, Section 5.3.17SUMMARY SCOREAssessing VulnerabilityRequirement §201.4(c)(2)(ii): [The State risk assessment shall include an] overview and analysis of the State’s vulnerability to the hazards described in thisparagraph (c)(2), based on estimates provided in local risk assessments as well as the State risk assessment. The State shall describe vulnerability in terms ofthe jurisdictions most threatened by the identified hazards, and most vulnerable to damage and loss associated with hazard events. State owned critical oroperated facilities located in the identified hazard areas shall also be addressed … .Requirement §201.4(d): Plan must be reviewed and revised to reflect changes in development…Assessing Vulnerability by JurisdictionLocation in theSCOREPlan (section orN SElementannex and page #) Reviewer’s CommentsA. Does the new or updated plan describe the State’s vulnerability Section 5based on estimates provided in local risk assessments as well asJanuary 2008 6